{"title":"决定","authors":"Peter Tochtermann","doi":"10.18356/8f7238c9-en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decisions and orders of the Court are taken by a majority of the panel (Art 78(1) UPCA). In the event of a tied vote, the vote of the presiding judge will prevail (Art 78(1) UPCA). These rules are repeated in para 1: as the panel can sit with four judges—for example, where a local division has called for a technical judge to hear a counterclaim for revocation according to Art 33(3)(a) UPCA—para 1 provides that in this case the decisions will also be taken by majority vote with the presiding judge’s vote being decisive in the case of a tied vote.","PeriodicalId":148159,"journal":{"name":"Economic Life in the Real World","volume":"200 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decisions\",\"authors\":\"Peter Tochtermann\",\"doi\":\"10.18356/8f7238c9-en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Decisions and orders of the Court are taken by a majority of the panel (Art 78(1) UPCA). In the event of a tied vote, the vote of the presiding judge will prevail (Art 78(1) UPCA). These rules are repeated in para 1: as the panel can sit with four judges—for example, where a local division has called for a technical judge to hear a counterclaim for revocation according to Art 33(3)(a) UPCA—para 1 provides that in this case the decisions will also be taken by majority vote with the presiding judge’s vote being decisive in the case of a tied vote.\",\"PeriodicalId\":148159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Life in the Real World\",\"volume\":\"200 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Life in the Real World\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18356/8f7238c9-en\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Life in the Real World","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18356/8f7238c9-en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Decisions and orders of the Court are taken by a majority of the panel (Art 78(1) UPCA). In the event of a tied vote, the vote of the presiding judge will prevail (Art 78(1) UPCA). These rules are repeated in para 1: as the panel can sit with four judges—for example, where a local division has called for a technical judge to hear a counterclaim for revocation according to Art 33(3)(a) UPCA—para 1 provides that in this case the decisions will also be taken by majority vote with the presiding judge’s vote being decisive in the case of a tied vote.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
