基于价值观的领导理论的比较分析:回顾与未来研究议程

S. Abay, J. Gomes, A. Mengistu
{"title":"基于价值观的领导理论的比较分析:回顾与未来研究议程","authors":"S. Abay, J. Gomes, A. Mengistu","doi":"10.22543/1948-0733.1457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper systematically reviews the literature on values-based leadership (VBL) theories by analyzing 161 studies published in different peer-review journals from 2000 to 2022. The study first identified the literature on VBL and found that the terms “values-oriented, valuescentered, or value-based” leadership are used interchangeably as a roof term for various theories focusing on the moral, authentic, principled, and ethical dimensions of leadership. The literature on leadership offers different types of leadership theories that constitute VBL, but we focused on six leadership theories that are widely cited as forms of VBL and have a strong theoretical background. The key theoretical components of each theory were then compared to pinpoint how they relate to the other forms of VBL theories. Our results from the comparative analysis revealed that transformational leadership is a broader theory and many of the core dimensions of the other five VBL theories overlap with the essential theoretical components of transformational leadership which raises a question on their distinctiveness as separate theories. Based on our literature review, we offered our conceptualization of VBL to bring more clarity and harmonization to the concept. Finally, we presented a conclusion and forwarded an agenda for future research. Introduction Leadership is one of the most researched areas in organizational studies and leadership researchers are persistently looking at the key constructs of leadership. Hence, today’s leadership theories have evolved over time, and the theory of leadership has been changing from time to time; Grint (2011:13) mentioned that “leadership has been always related to the cultural mores that prevail at the time, and what appears ‘normal’ at one time can often appear extraordinarily naive when considered retrospectively.” Over the last few decades, SIMON TAREKE ABAY ADDIS ABABA, ETHIOPIA JORGE F. S. GOMES LISBON, PORTUGAL ABEBA BEYENE MENGISTU ADDIS ABABA, ETHIOPIA","PeriodicalId":203965,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Values-Based Leadership","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Analysis of Values-Based Leadership Theories: A Review and Future Research Agenda\",\"authors\":\"S. Abay, J. Gomes, A. Mengistu\",\"doi\":\"10.22543/1948-0733.1457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper systematically reviews the literature on values-based leadership (VBL) theories by analyzing 161 studies published in different peer-review journals from 2000 to 2022. The study first identified the literature on VBL and found that the terms “values-oriented, valuescentered, or value-based” leadership are used interchangeably as a roof term for various theories focusing on the moral, authentic, principled, and ethical dimensions of leadership. The literature on leadership offers different types of leadership theories that constitute VBL, but we focused on six leadership theories that are widely cited as forms of VBL and have a strong theoretical background. The key theoretical components of each theory were then compared to pinpoint how they relate to the other forms of VBL theories. Our results from the comparative analysis revealed that transformational leadership is a broader theory and many of the core dimensions of the other five VBL theories overlap with the essential theoretical components of transformational leadership which raises a question on their distinctiveness as separate theories. Based on our literature review, we offered our conceptualization of VBL to bring more clarity and harmonization to the concept. Finally, we presented a conclusion and forwarded an agenda for future research. Introduction Leadership is one of the most researched areas in organizational studies and leadership researchers are persistently looking at the key constructs of leadership. Hence, today’s leadership theories have evolved over time, and the theory of leadership has been changing from time to time; Grint (2011:13) mentioned that “leadership has been always related to the cultural mores that prevail at the time, and what appears ‘normal’ at one time can often appear extraordinarily naive when considered retrospectively.” Over the last few decades, SIMON TAREKE ABAY ADDIS ABABA, ETHIOPIA JORGE F. S. GOMES LISBON, PORTUGAL ABEBA BEYENE MENGISTU ADDIS ABABA, ETHIOPIA\",\"PeriodicalId\":203965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Values-Based Leadership\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Values-Based Leadership\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22543/1948-0733.1457\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Values-Based Leadership","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22543/1948-0733.1457","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文通过分析2000年至2022年发表在不同同行评议期刊上的161项研究,系统地回顾了价值观型领导理论的相关文献。该研究首先确定了关于VBL的文献,并发现“价值导向的、以价值为中心的或以价值为基础的”这些术语可以互换使用,作为关注领导的道德、真实、原则和伦理维度的各种理论的主要术语。关于领导力的文献提供了不同类型的领导理论,构成了VBL,但我们重点研究了六种被广泛引用的领导理论,作为VBL的形式,具有很强的理论背景。然后对每个理论的关键理论组成部分进行比较,以确定它们与其他形式的VBL理论的关系。对比分析的结果表明,变革型领导是一个更广泛的理论,其他五种VBL理论的许多核心维度与变革型领导的基本理论组成部分重叠,这就提出了它们作为独立理论的独特性问题。在文献回顾的基础上,我们提出了VBL的概念,以使这个概念更加清晰和协调。最后,本文提出了结论,并对未来的研究提出了展望。领导力是组织研究中研究最多的领域之一,领导力研究者一直在关注领导力的关键结构。因此,今天的领导理论随着时间的推移而发展,领导理论也在不断变化;Grint(2011:13)提到“领导力总是与当时盛行的文化习俗有关,而在过去看来‘正常’的东西,回过头来看往往会显得异常幼稚。”在过去的几十年里,西蒙·塔雷克阿拜,亚的斯亚贝巴,埃塞俄比亚,乔治·f·s·戈麦斯,葡萄牙,里斯本,阿拜,贝耶恩·门吉斯图,埃塞俄比亚,亚的斯亚贝巴
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Analysis of Values-Based Leadership Theories: A Review and Future Research Agenda
This paper systematically reviews the literature on values-based leadership (VBL) theories by analyzing 161 studies published in different peer-review journals from 2000 to 2022. The study first identified the literature on VBL and found that the terms “values-oriented, valuescentered, or value-based” leadership are used interchangeably as a roof term for various theories focusing on the moral, authentic, principled, and ethical dimensions of leadership. The literature on leadership offers different types of leadership theories that constitute VBL, but we focused on six leadership theories that are widely cited as forms of VBL and have a strong theoretical background. The key theoretical components of each theory were then compared to pinpoint how they relate to the other forms of VBL theories. Our results from the comparative analysis revealed that transformational leadership is a broader theory and many of the core dimensions of the other five VBL theories overlap with the essential theoretical components of transformational leadership which raises a question on their distinctiveness as separate theories. Based on our literature review, we offered our conceptualization of VBL to bring more clarity and harmonization to the concept. Finally, we presented a conclusion and forwarded an agenda for future research. Introduction Leadership is one of the most researched areas in organizational studies and leadership researchers are persistently looking at the key constructs of leadership. Hence, today’s leadership theories have evolved over time, and the theory of leadership has been changing from time to time; Grint (2011:13) mentioned that “leadership has been always related to the cultural mores that prevail at the time, and what appears ‘normal’ at one time can often appear extraordinarily naive when considered retrospectively.” Over the last few decades, SIMON TAREKE ABAY ADDIS ABABA, ETHIOPIA JORGE F. S. GOMES LISBON, PORTUGAL ABEBA BEYENE MENGISTU ADDIS ABABA, ETHIOPIA
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信