{"title":"基于游戏的学习研究的随机对照试验的困境-过去的问题和潜在的解决方案","authors":"Andrea Gauthier, J. Jenkinson","doi":"10.1109/VS-GAMES.2016.7590382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for scientific research but pose many obstacles for game-based learning (GBL) studies. This poster is intended to foster a discussion about RCTs by summarizing two recent trials performed by the authors and comparing the distinctly different protocols including length of stimulus exposure, levels of internal and external validity, and sample size considerations. Finally, a proposed protocol for a third RCT is presented that attempts to reconcile the pros and cons from the previously described studies, while maintaining rigour in the research - the authors seek feedback from conference attendees as to the protocol's viability.","PeriodicalId":239485,"journal":{"name":"2016 8th International Conference on Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications (VS-GAMES)","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Woes of an RCT for Game-Based Learning Research - Past Problems and Potential Solutions\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Gauthier, J. Jenkinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/VS-GAMES.2016.7590382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for scientific research but pose many obstacles for game-based learning (GBL) studies. This poster is intended to foster a discussion about RCTs by summarizing two recent trials performed by the authors and comparing the distinctly different protocols including length of stimulus exposure, levels of internal and external validity, and sample size considerations. Finally, a proposed protocol for a third RCT is presented that attempts to reconcile the pros and cons from the previously described studies, while maintaining rigour in the research - the authors seek feedback from conference attendees as to the protocol's viability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":239485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 8th International Conference on Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications (VS-GAMES)\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 8th International Conference on Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications (VS-GAMES)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/VS-GAMES.2016.7590382\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 8th International Conference on Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications (VS-GAMES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VS-GAMES.2016.7590382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Woes of an RCT for Game-Based Learning Research - Past Problems and Potential Solutions
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for scientific research but pose many obstacles for game-based learning (GBL) studies. This poster is intended to foster a discussion about RCTs by summarizing two recent trials performed by the authors and comparing the distinctly different protocols including length of stimulus exposure, levels of internal and external validity, and sample size considerations. Finally, a proposed protocol for a third RCT is presented that attempts to reconcile the pros and cons from the previously described studies, while maintaining rigour in the research - the authors seek feedback from conference attendees as to the protocol's viability.