复杂感受野的神经元编码模型:非参数和参数方法的比较

Rahul Agarwal, Z. Chen, F. Kloosterman, M. Wilson, S. Sarma
{"title":"复杂感受野的神经元编码模型:非参数和参数方法的比较","authors":"Rahul Agarwal, Z. Chen, F. Kloosterman, M. Wilson, S. Sarma","doi":"10.1109/CISS.2016.7460564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Parametric models have been widely used to estimate conditional intensity functions of neuronal spike train point processes and are efficient to construct from experimental data. Furthermore, parametric models are easy to interpret. However, neurons that have more complex receptive fields may not be sufficiently characterized through parametric modeling since it imposes strict structure on the encoding fields. In this paper, we consider a pyramidal neuron recorded from the rat hippocampus, called a “place” cell, that has a diverse apparently multimodal receptive field that encodes information about the spatial position while the rat freely-forages in a circular environment. We construct encoding models for this place cell using two nonparametric modeling approaches, our recently developed band-limited maximum likelihood (BLML) estimator and a kernel density estimator (KDE); and compare them to models constructed using two parametric approaches that have been previously applied to these neurons. We found that the BLML and KDE better capture the complex receptive field of the studied cell as measured by the KS-statistic and log-likelihood.","PeriodicalId":346776,"journal":{"name":"2016 Annual Conference on Information Science and Systems (CISS)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuronal encoding models of complex receptive fields: A comparison of nonparametric and parametric approaches\",\"authors\":\"Rahul Agarwal, Z. Chen, F. Kloosterman, M. Wilson, S. Sarma\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CISS.2016.7460564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Parametric models have been widely used to estimate conditional intensity functions of neuronal spike train point processes and are efficient to construct from experimental data. Furthermore, parametric models are easy to interpret. However, neurons that have more complex receptive fields may not be sufficiently characterized through parametric modeling since it imposes strict structure on the encoding fields. In this paper, we consider a pyramidal neuron recorded from the rat hippocampus, called a “place” cell, that has a diverse apparently multimodal receptive field that encodes information about the spatial position while the rat freely-forages in a circular environment. We construct encoding models for this place cell using two nonparametric modeling approaches, our recently developed band-limited maximum likelihood (BLML) estimator and a kernel density estimator (KDE); and compare them to models constructed using two parametric approaches that have been previously applied to these neurons. We found that the BLML and KDE better capture the complex receptive field of the studied cell as measured by the KS-statistic and log-likelihood.\",\"PeriodicalId\":346776,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 Annual Conference on Information Science and Systems (CISS)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 Annual Conference on Information Science and Systems (CISS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CISS.2016.7460564\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Annual Conference on Information Science and Systems (CISS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CISS.2016.7460564","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

参数化模型被广泛用于估计神经元峰列点过程的条件强度函数,并且可以有效地从实验数据中构造。此外,参数化模型易于解释。然而,具有更复杂接受野的神经元可能无法通过参数化建模充分表征,因为它对编码场施加了严格的结构。在本文中,我们考虑了从大鼠海马体中记录的锥体神经元,称为“位置”细胞,当大鼠在圆形环境中自由觅食时,它具有多种明显的多模态接受野,编码有关空间位置的信息。我们使用两种非参数建模方法,即我们最近开发的带限最大似然(BLML)估计器和核密度估计器(KDE)来构建该位置单元的编码模型;并将它们与之前应用于这些神经元的两种参数方法构建的模型进行比较。我们发现BLML和KDE更好地捕获了研究细胞的复杂感受野,通过ks统计和对数似然来测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neuronal encoding models of complex receptive fields: A comparison of nonparametric and parametric approaches
Parametric models have been widely used to estimate conditional intensity functions of neuronal spike train point processes and are efficient to construct from experimental data. Furthermore, parametric models are easy to interpret. However, neurons that have more complex receptive fields may not be sufficiently characterized through parametric modeling since it imposes strict structure on the encoding fields. In this paper, we consider a pyramidal neuron recorded from the rat hippocampus, called a “place” cell, that has a diverse apparently multimodal receptive field that encodes information about the spatial position while the rat freely-forages in a circular environment. We construct encoding models for this place cell using two nonparametric modeling approaches, our recently developed band-limited maximum likelihood (BLML) estimator and a kernel density estimator (KDE); and compare them to models constructed using two parametric approaches that have been previously applied to these neurons. We found that the BLML and KDE better capture the complex receptive field of the studied cell as measured by the KS-statistic and log-likelihood.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信