ICFHR 2010竞赛:二值化算法的定量评价

Roberto Paredes Palacios, E. Kavallieratou, R. Lins
{"title":"ICFHR 2010竞赛:二值化算法的定量评价","authors":"Roberto Paredes Palacios, E. Kavallieratou, R. Lins","doi":"10.1109/ICFHR.2010.119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes the ICFHR 2010 Contest for quantitative evaluation of binarization algorithms. These algorithm are applied to synthetic images of modern pdf documents with noise from historical documents. Today, many scientists work on the binarization task and many algorithms have been proposed. However, the selection of the most appropriate one is not a simple procedure. The evaluation of these algorithms proved to be another difficult task since there is no objective way to compare the results. Here, 4 groups with 6 systems are participating in the competition. The experimental setting is described in detail. Moreover, a short description of the participating groups, their systems, and the results achieved are finally presented","PeriodicalId":335044,"journal":{"name":"2010 12th International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ICFHR 2010 Contest: Quantitative Evaluation of Binarization Algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Roberto Paredes Palacios, E. Kavallieratou, R. Lins\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICFHR.2010.119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper describes the ICFHR 2010 Contest for quantitative evaluation of binarization algorithms. These algorithm are applied to synthetic images of modern pdf documents with noise from historical documents. Today, many scientists work on the binarization task and many algorithms have been proposed. However, the selection of the most appropriate one is not a simple procedure. The evaluation of these algorithms proved to be another difficult task since there is no objective way to compare the results. Here, 4 groups with 6 systems are participating in the competition. The experimental setting is described in detail. Moreover, a short description of the participating groups, their systems, and the results achieved are finally presented\",\"PeriodicalId\":335044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2010 12th International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition\",\"volume\":\"109 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"27\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2010 12th International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICFHR.2010.119\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 12th International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICFHR.2010.119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

摘要

本文描述了2010年ICFHR二值化算法定量评估竞赛。将这些算法应用于含历史文档噪声的现代pdf文档图像合成。如今,许多科学家致力于二值化任务,并提出了许多算法。然而,选择最合适的一个并不是一个简单的过程。这些算法的评估被证明是另一项困难的任务,因为没有客观的方法来比较结果。这里有4个小组,6个系统参加比赛。详细介绍了实验环境。此外,还简要介绍了参与小组、他们的系统和取得的成果
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ICFHR 2010 Contest: Quantitative Evaluation of Binarization Algorithms
This paper describes the ICFHR 2010 Contest for quantitative evaluation of binarization algorithms. These algorithm are applied to synthetic images of modern pdf documents with noise from historical documents. Today, many scientists work on the binarization task and many algorithms have been proposed. However, the selection of the most appropriate one is not a simple procedure. The evaluation of these algorithms proved to be another difficult task since there is no objective way to compare the results. Here, 4 groups with 6 systems are participating in the competition. The experimental setting is described in detail. Moreover, a short description of the participating groups, their systems, and the results achieved are finally presented
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信