操作性

Con Texte Pub Date : 2018-10-17 DOI:10.28984/ct.v2i1.279

Steven Umbrello

{"title":"操作性","authors":"Steven Umbrello","doi":"10.28984/ct.v2i1.279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Defining posthumanism as a single, well-oriented philosophy is a difficult if not impossible endeavour. Part of the reason for this difficulty is accounted by posthumanism’s illusive origins and its perpetually changing hermeneutics. This short paper gives a brief account of the ecological trend in contemporary posthumanism and provides a short prescription for the future of posthumanist literature and potential research avenues.","PeriodicalId":343114,"journal":{"name":"Con Texte","volume":"408 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Posthumanism\",\"authors\":\"Steven Umbrello\",\"doi\":\"10.28984/ct.v2i1.279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Defining posthumanism as a single, well-oriented philosophy is a difficult if not impossible endeavour. Part of the reason for this difficulty is accounted by posthumanism’s illusive origins and its perpetually changing hermeneutics. This short paper gives a brief account of the ecological trend in contemporary posthumanism and provides a short prescription for the future of posthumanist literature and potential research avenues.\",\"PeriodicalId\":343114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Con Texte\",\"volume\":\"408 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Con Texte\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.28984/ct.v2i1.279\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Con Texte","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28984/ct.v2i1.279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

将后人文主义定义为一种单一的、定向良好的哲学，即使不是不可能，也是一项困难的努力。造成这种困难的部分原因在于后人文主义的虚幻起源及其不断变化的解释学。本文简要介绍了当代后人文主义的生态趋势，并对后人文主义文学的未来和潜在的研究途径提出了一个简短的建议。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Posthumanism

Defining posthumanism as a single, well-oriented philosophy is a difficult if not impossible endeavour. Part of the reason for this difficulty is accounted by posthumanism’s illusive origins and its perpetually changing hermeneutics. This short paper gives a brief account of the ecological trend in contemporary posthumanism and provides a short prescription for the future of posthumanist literature and potential research avenues.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Con Texte

自引率

0.00%

发文量