以霉酚酸酯为基础的治疗口腔黏膜疾病在英国口腔医学部门

Sônia Sin, Helen Rogers, R. Cowie, K. Staines, L. Hollén, D. Shanahan
{"title":"以霉酚酸酯为基础的治疗口腔黏膜疾病在英国口腔医学部门","authors":"Sônia Sin, Helen Rogers, R. Cowie, K. Staines, L. Hollén, D. Shanahan","doi":"10.1308/rcsfdj.2023.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is often used in oral medicine. Reasons include its efficacy in treating inflammatory diseases, its steroid sparing property and its favourable side effects profile. There is, however, limited scientific evidence to justify its use in oral medicine. The aim of this study was to review the indications and prescribing practice relating to MMF in a tertiary oral medicine centre, and to document its tolerability and efficacy. A retrospective record review was undertaken of patients prescribed MMF between January 2019 and January 2022 at Bristol Dental Hospital. Patients were identified from a local database set up to highlight and monitor departmental immunosuppressant medication usage. Medical records were assessed using a standardised data collection proforma. Twenty-five patients (20 female, 5 male; median age 64 years) were included in the study. The conditions for which MMF was prescribed comprised oral lichen planus (48%), mucous membrane pemphigoid (36%), pemphigus vulgaris (12%) and recurrent aphthous stomatitis (4%). Typically, MMF was prescribed at 500 mg twice daily. The median duration of treatment was 28 months. Side effects were documented in 52% of patients. In all cases, MMF was commenced owing to inadequate response to previous treatments. Over half (56%) of the patients discontinued systemic prednisolone while using MMF. Overall, 80% achieved complete clinical improvement. MMF is effective and well tolerated in oral medicine patients. Its use is comparable with that documented in the dermatology literature.","PeriodicalId":342721,"journal":{"name":"Faculty Dental Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mycophenolate mofetil-based treatment for oral mucosal disease in a UK oral medicine department\",\"authors\":\"Sônia Sin, Helen Rogers, R. Cowie, K. Staines, L. Hollén, D. Shanahan\",\"doi\":\"10.1308/rcsfdj.2023.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is often used in oral medicine. Reasons include its efficacy in treating inflammatory diseases, its steroid sparing property and its favourable side effects profile. There is, however, limited scientific evidence to justify its use in oral medicine. The aim of this study was to review the indications and prescribing practice relating to MMF in a tertiary oral medicine centre, and to document its tolerability and efficacy. A retrospective record review was undertaken of patients prescribed MMF between January 2019 and January 2022 at Bristol Dental Hospital. Patients were identified from a local database set up to highlight and monitor departmental immunosuppressant medication usage. Medical records were assessed using a standardised data collection proforma. Twenty-five patients (20 female, 5 male; median age 64 years) were included in the study. The conditions for which MMF was prescribed comprised oral lichen planus (48%), mucous membrane pemphigoid (36%), pemphigus vulgaris (12%) and recurrent aphthous stomatitis (4%). Typically, MMF was prescribed at 500 mg twice daily. The median duration of treatment was 28 months. Side effects were documented in 52% of patients. In all cases, MMF was commenced owing to inadequate response to previous treatments. Over half (56%) of the patients discontinued systemic prednisolone while using MMF. Overall, 80% achieved complete clinical improvement. MMF is effective and well tolerated in oral medicine patients. Its use is comparable with that documented in the dermatology literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":342721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Faculty Dental Journal\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Faculty Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsfdj.2023.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Faculty Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1308/rcsfdj.2023.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

霉酚酸酯(MMF)常用于口腔医学。原因包括其治疗炎症性疾病的疗效,其类固醇节省特性和良好的副作用。然而,证明其用于口腔医学的科学证据有限。本研究的目的是回顾三级口腔医学中心有关MMF的适应症和处方实践,并记录其耐受性和疗效。对布里斯托尔牙科医院2019年1月至2022年1月期间处方MMF的患者进行了回顾性记录审查。从当地数据库中识别患者,该数据库旨在突出和监测部门免疫抑制药物的使用情况。使用标准化数据收集形式评估医疗记录。25例,其中女性20例,男性5例;中位年龄64岁)被纳入研究。MMF治疗的病症包括口腔扁平苔藓(48%)、粘膜类天疱疮(36%)、寻常性天疱疮(12%)和复发性口腔炎(4%)。通常,MMF的处方剂量为500毫克,每天两次。中位治疗持续时间为28个月。52%的患者记录有副作用。在所有病例中,由于对以前的治疗反应不足而开始MMF。超过一半(56%)的患者在使用MMF时停用全身性泼尼松龙。总体而言,80%的患者临床完全改善。MMF对口服药物患者有效且耐受性良好。它的使用与皮肤科文献记载的相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mycophenolate mofetil-based treatment for oral mucosal disease in a UK oral medicine department
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is often used in oral medicine. Reasons include its efficacy in treating inflammatory diseases, its steroid sparing property and its favourable side effects profile. There is, however, limited scientific evidence to justify its use in oral medicine. The aim of this study was to review the indications and prescribing practice relating to MMF in a tertiary oral medicine centre, and to document its tolerability and efficacy. A retrospective record review was undertaken of patients prescribed MMF between January 2019 and January 2022 at Bristol Dental Hospital. Patients were identified from a local database set up to highlight and monitor departmental immunosuppressant medication usage. Medical records were assessed using a standardised data collection proforma. Twenty-five patients (20 female, 5 male; median age 64 years) were included in the study. The conditions for which MMF was prescribed comprised oral lichen planus (48%), mucous membrane pemphigoid (36%), pemphigus vulgaris (12%) and recurrent aphthous stomatitis (4%). Typically, MMF was prescribed at 500 mg twice daily. The median duration of treatment was 28 months. Side effects were documented in 52% of patients. In all cases, MMF was commenced owing to inadequate response to previous treatments. Over half (56%) of the patients discontinued systemic prednisolone while using MMF. Overall, 80% achieved complete clinical improvement. MMF is effective and well tolerated in oral medicine patients. Its use is comparable with that documented in the dermatology literature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信