{"title":"《别让我走》中逃避的委婉语","authors":"Elana Koehler","doi":"10.21633/issn.2380.5064/s.2023.05.02.60","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among scholarly discussions of Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go (2005), the idea of the clones’ manipulation in order to fulfill their roles in the organ transplantation system is pervasive. Many posit that the clones begin to place their sense of self and identity within their roles as organ suppliers. However, I argue that there is a lack of discussion and significance attributed to the role of the potential outlets of “escape” and their role in the clones’ submission to exploitation. I posit that the clones’ belief in the possibility of “escape” from this system, whether this comes in the form of relationships, identity, or future plans, is essential to the continued function of the system itself. Employing a Marxist lens in the form of Althusser’s ideas of ideological state apparatuses (ISA) and interpellation as described in his work Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (1971), I highlight the ways in which the clones are distracted from the horrors of their roles in the overall system by false feelings of agency and individuality provided by these “escapes.” Ultimately, by overlooking the role of these outlets for “escape” from the ISA in the interpellation of the clones, we are in turn failing to acknowledge the ways the ISAs around us ensnare our participation by manipulating us into creating our sense of individuality and identity around the parameters of the system. While the clones form relationships and begin to characterize themselves, they do so only through their participation in the ISA and through their sense of fulfillment thereof. This in turn perpetuates the system and prevents any mass forms of rebellion, escape, or overturning of the ISA.","PeriodicalId":410927,"journal":{"name":"The Arsenal: The Undergraduate Research Journal of Augusta University","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Euphemism of Escape in Never Let Me Go\",\"authors\":\"Elana Koehler\",\"doi\":\"10.21633/issn.2380.5064/s.2023.05.02.60\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Among scholarly discussions of Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go (2005), the idea of the clones’ manipulation in order to fulfill their roles in the organ transplantation system is pervasive. Many posit that the clones begin to place their sense of self and identity within their roles as organ suppliers. However, I argue that there is a lack of discussion and significance attributed to the role of the potential outlets of “escape” and their role in the clones’ submission to exploitation. I posit that the clones’ belief in the possibility of “escape” from this system, whether this comes in the form of relationships, identity, or future plans, is essential to the continued function of the system itself. Employing a Marxist lens in the form of Althusser’s ideas of ideological state apparatuses (ISA) and interpellation as described in his work Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (1971), I highlight the ways in which the clones are distracted from the horrors of their roles in the overall system by false feelings of agency and individuality provided by these “escapes.” Ultimately, by overlooking the role of these outlets for “escape” from the ISA in the interpellation of the clones, we are in turn failing to acknowledge the ways the ISAs around us ensnare our participation by manipulating us into creating our sense of individuality and identity around the parameters of the system. While the clones form relationships and begin to characterize themselves, they do so only through their participation in the ISA and through their sense of fulfillment thereof. This in turn perpetuates the system and prevents any mass forms of rebellion, escape, or overturning of the ISA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":410927,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Arsenal: The Undergraduate Research Journal of Augusta University\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Arsenal: The Undergraduate Research Journal of Augusta University\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21633/issn.2380.5064/s.2023.05.02.60\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Arsenal: The Undergraduate Research Journal of Augusta University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21633/issn.2380.5064/s.2023.05.02.60","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在石黑一雄(Kazuo Ishiguro)的《别让我走》(Never Let Me Go, 2005)的学术讨论中,克隆人被操纵以履行其在器官移植系统中的角色的想法是普遍存在的。许多人认为,克隆人开始将自我意识和身份认同置于他们作为器官提供者的角色之中。然而,我认为对于潜在的“逃跑”出口的作用以及它们在克隆人屈服于剥削中的作用,缺乏讨论和意义。我认为,克隆人相信从这个系统中“逃脱”的可能性,无论是以关系、身份还是未来计划的形式出现,对系统本身的持续功能至关重要。在阿尔都塞的著作《意识形态和意识形态国家机器》(1971)中,我以马克思主义的视角,运用他关于意识形态国家机器(ISA)和质询的观点,强调了克隆人如何被这些“逃脱”所提供的虚假的代理和个性感,从他们在整个系统中角色的恐怖中分散注意力。最终,由于忽视了这些在克隆审问中“逃离”ISA的出口的作用,我们反过来也没有认识到我们周围的ISA是如何通过操纵我们在系统参数周围创造我们的个性和身份感来诱骗我们参与的。当克隆人形成关系并开始塑造自己的特征时,他们只是通过参与ISA并通过他们对ISA的满足感来做到这一点。这反过来又使该制度得以延续,并防止任何大规模的叛乱、逃跑或推翻ISA。
Among scholarly discussions of Kazuo Ishiguro’s Never Let Me Go (2005), the idea of the clones’ manipulation in order to fulfill their roles in the organ transplantation system is pervasive. Many posit that the clones begin to place their sense of self and identity within their roles as organ suppliers. However, I argue that there is a lack of discussion and significance attributed to the role of the potential outlets of “escape” and their role in the clones’ submission to exploitation. I posit that the clones’ belief in the possibility of “escape” from this system, whether this comes in the form of relationships, identity, or future plans, is essential to the continued function of the system itself. Employing a Marxist lens in the form of Althusser’s ideas of ideological state apparatuses (ISA) and interpellation as described in his work Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (1971), I highlight the ways in which the clones are distracted from the horrors of their roles in the overall system by false feelings of agency and individuality provided by these “escapes.” Ultimately, by overlooking the role of these outlets for “escape” from the ISA in the interpellation of the clones, we are in turn failing to acknowledge the ways the ISAs around us ensnare our participation by manipulating us into creating our sense of individuality and identity around the parameters of the system. While the clones form relationships and begin to characterize themselves, they do so only through their participation in the ISA and through their sense of fulfillment thereof. This in turn perpetuates the system and prevents any mass forms of rebellion, escape, or overturning of the ISA.