{"title":"并非人人平等:脑机接口的个人技术匹配","authors":"Adriane B. Randolph","doi":"10.1109/HICSS.2012.451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work presents a model stemming from literature on task-technology fit that seeks to match individual user characteristics and features of brain-computer interface technologies with performance to expedite the technology-fit process. The individual-technology fit model is tested with a brain-computer interface based on a control signal called the mu rhythm that is recorded from the motor cortex region. Characteristics from eighty total participants are tested across two different sessions. Performance is measured as a person's ability to modulate his/her mu rhythm. It appears that the version of software used in recording and interpreting EEGs, instrument playing, being on affective drugs, a person's sex, and age all play key roles in predicting mu rhythm modulation.","PeriodicalId":380801,"journal":{"name":"2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences","volume":"320 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"38","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Not All Created Equal: Individual-Technology Fit of Brain-Computer Interfaces\",\"authors\":\"Adriane B. Randolph\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HICSS.2012.451\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This work presents a model stemming from literature on task-technology fit that seeks to match individual user characteristics and features of brain-computer interface technologies with performance to expedite the technology-fit process. The individual-technology fit model is tested with a brain-computer interface based on a control signal called the mu rhythm that is recorded from the motor cortex region. Characteristics from eighty total participants are tested across two different sessions. Performance is measured as a person's ability to modulate his/her mu rhythm. It appears that the version of software used in recording and interpreting EEGs, instrument playing, being on affective drugs, a person's sex, and age all play key roles in predicting mu rhythm modulation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":380801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences\",\"volume\":\"320 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"38\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2012.451\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2012.451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Not All Created Equal: Individual-Technology Fit of Brain-Computer Interfaces
This work presents a model stemming from literature on task-technology fit that seeks to match individual user characteristics and features of brain-computer interface technologies with performance to expedite the technology-fit process. The individual-technology fit model is tested with a brain-computer interface based on a control signal called the mu rhythm that is recorded from the motor cortex region. Characteristics from eighty total participants are tested across two different sessions. Performance is measured as a person's ability to modulate his/her mu rhythm. It appears that the version of software used in recording and interpreting EEGs, instrument playing, being on affective drugs, a person's sex, and age all play key roles in predicting mu rhythm modulation.