如何指定和证明MANET安全路由协议的正确性

Panos Papadimitratos, Z. Haas, J. Hubaux
{"title":"如何指定和证明MANET安全路由协议的正确性","authors":"Panos Papadimitratos, Z. Haas, J. Hubaux","doi":"10.1109/BROADNETS.2006.4374344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Secure routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks have been developed recently, yet, it has been unclear what are the properties they achieve, as a formal analysis of these protocols is mostly lacking. In this paper, we are concerned with this problem, how to specify and how to prove the correctness of a secure routing protocol. We provide a definition of what a protocol is expected to achieve independently of its functionality, as well as a communication and adversary models. This way, we enable formal reasoning on the correctness of secure routing protocols. We demonstrate this by analyzing two protocols from the literature.","PeriodicalId":147887,"journal":{"name":"2006 3rd International Conference on Broadband Communications, Networks and Systems","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to Specify and How to Prove Correctness of Secure Routing Protocols for MANET\",\"authors\":\"Panos Papadimitratos, Z. Haas, J. Hubaux\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/BROADNETS.2006.4374344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Secure routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks have been developed recently, yet, it has been unclear what are the properties they achieve, as a formal analysis of these protocols is mostly lacking. In this paper, we are concerned with this problem, how to specify and how to prove the correctness of a secure routing protocol. We provide a definition of what a protocol is expected to achieve independently of its functionality, as well as a communication and adversary models. This way, we enable formal reasoning on the correctness of secure routing protocols. We demonstrate this by analyzing two protocols from the literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":147887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2006 3rd International Conference on Broadband Communications, Networks and Systems\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2006 3rd International Conference on Broadband Communications, Networks and Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/BROADNETS.2006.4374344\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 3rd International Conference on Broadband Communications, Networks and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BROADNETS.2006.4374344","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

移动自组织网络的安全路由协议最近已经开发出来,然而,由于缺乏对这些协议的正式分析,它们实现的属性一直不清楚。本文主要研究如何指定和证明安全路由协议的正确性。我们提供了一个独立于其功能的协议期望实现的定义,以及通信和对手模型。这样,我们就可以对安全路由协议的正确性进行形式化推理。我们通过分析文献中的两个协议来证明这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How to Specify and How to Prove Correctness of Secure Routing Protocols for MANET
Secure routing protocols for mobile ad hoc networks have been developed recently, yet, it has been unclear what are the properties they achieve, as a formal analysis of these protocols is mostly lacking. In this paper, we are concerned with this problem, how to specify and how to prove the correctness of a secure routing protocol. We provide a definition of what a protocol is expected to achieve independently of its functionality, as well as a communication and adversary models. This way, we enable formal reasoning on the correctness of secure routing protocols. We demonstrate this by analyzing two protocols from the literature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信