{"title":"马来西亚早期流光发射和电荷转移系统的研究综述","authors":"Z. Hartono, I. Robiah","doi":"10.1109/EMCZUR.2006.214886","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies that compared the performances of the early streamer emission (ESE) air terminals and the charge transfer system (CTS) with that of the Franklin rod (FR) system have been conducted in Malaysia since 2003. The results from these studies suggest that the ESE and CTS systems were more effective than the FR system. However, a review of the available information shows that the results were based on bizarre and flawed analyses of research data and that they were carried out by proponents of the ESE and CTS systems","PeriodicalId":130489,"journal":{"name":"2006 17th International Zurich Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A review of studies on early streamer emission and charge transfer system conducted in Malaysia\",\"authors\":\"Z. Hartono, I. Robiah\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EMCZUR.2006.214886\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Studies that compared the performances of the early streamer emission (ESE) air terminals and the charge transfer system (CTS) with that of the Franklin rod (FR) system have been conducted in Malaysia since 2003. The results from these studies suggest that the ESE and CTS systems were more effective than the FR system. However, a review of the available information shows that the results were based on bizarre and flawed analyses of research data and that they were carried out by proponents of the ESE and CTS systems\",\"PeriodicalId\":130489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2006 17th International Zurich Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2006 17th International Zurich Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EMCZUR.2006.214886\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 17th International Zurich Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EMCZUR.2006.214886","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A review of studies on early streamer emission and charge transfer system conducted in Malaysia
Studies that compared the performances of the early streamer emission (ESE) air terminals and the charge transfer system (CTS) with that of the Franklin rod (FR) system have been conducted in Malaysia since 2003. The results from these studies suggest that the ESE and CTS systems were more effective than the FR system. However, a review of the available information shows that the results were based on bizarre and flawed analyses of research data and that they were carried out by proponents of the ESE and CTS systems
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
