自然视觉场景中伸手的异中心编码模型

Parisa Abedi Khoozani, Paul R. Schrater, Dominik M. Endres, K. Fiehler, Gunnar Blohm
{"title":"自然视觉场景中伸手的异中心编码模型","authors":"Parisa Abedi Khoozani, Paul R. Schrater, Dominik M. Endres, K. Fiehler, Gunnar Blohm","doi":"10.32470/ccn.2019.1372-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To reach to objects, humans rely on relative positions of target objects to surrounding objects (allocentric) as well as to their own bodies (egocentric). Previous studies demonstrated that scene configuration and object relevancy to the task modulates the combination weights of allocentric and egocentric information. Egocentric coding for reaching is studied extensively; however, how allocentric information is coupled and used in reaching is unknown. Using a computational approach, we show that clustering mechanisms for allocentric coding combined with causal Bayesian integration of allocentric and egocentric information can account for the observed reaching behavior. To further understand allocentric coding, we propose two strategies, global vs. distributed landmark clustering (GLC vs. DLC). Both models can replicate the current data but each has distinct implications. GLC efficiently encodes the scene relative to a single virtual reference but loses all the local structure information. In contrary, DLC stores more redundant inter-object relationship information. Consequently, DLC is more sensitive to the changes of the scene. Further experiments must differentiate between the two proposed strategies.","PeriodicalId":281121,"journal":{"name":"2019 Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Models of allocentric coding for reaching in naturalistic visual scenes\",\"authors\":\"Parisa Abedi Khoozani, Paul R. Schrater, Dominik M. Endres, K. Fiehler, Gunnar Blohm\",\"doi\":\"10.32470/ccn.2019.1372-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To reach to objects, humans rely on relative positions of target objects to surrounding objects (allocentric) as well as to their own bodies (egocentric). Previous studies demonstrated that scene configuration and object relevancy to the task modulates the combination weights of allocentric and egocentric information. Egocentric coding for reaching is studied extensively; however, how allocentric information is coupled and used in reaching is unknown. Using a computational approach, we show that clustering mechanisms for allocentric coding combined with causal Bayesian integration of allocentric and egocentric information can account for the observed reaching behavior. To further understand allocentric coding, we propose two strategies, global vs. distributed landmark clustering (GLC vs. DLC). Both models can replicate the current data but each has distinct implications. GLC efficiently encodes the scene relative to a single virtual reference but loses all the local structure information. In contrary, DLC stores more redundant inter-object relationship information. Consequently, DLC is more sensitive to the changes of the scene. Further experiments must differentiate between the two proposed strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":281121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32470/ccn.2019.1372-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Conference on Cognitive Computational Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32470/ccn.2019.1372-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了接触到物体,人类依靠目标物体与周围物体的相对位置(非中心)以及与自己身体的相对位置(自我中心)。先前的研究表明,场景配置和目标与任务的相关性调节了非中心和自我中心信息的组合权重。以自我为中心的伸手编码得到了广泛的研究;然而,非中心信息是如何耦合和使用在到达是未知的。通过计算方法,我们证明了非中心编码的聚类机制与非中心和自我中心信息的因果贝叶斯整合可以解释观察到的到达行为。为了进一步理解非中心编码,我们提出了两种策略,全局与分布式地标聚类(GLC vs. DLC)。这两种模型都可以复制当前的数据,但每种模型都有不同的含义。相对于单个虚拟参考,GLC有效地对场景进行编码,但丢失了所有的局部结构信息。相反,DLC存储了更多冗余的对象间关系信息。因此,DLC对场景的变化更加敏感。进一步的实验必须区分这两种策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Models of allocentric coding for reaching in naturalistic visual scenes
To reach to objects, humans rely on relative positions of target objects to surrounding objects (allocentric) as well as to their own bodies (egocentric). Previous studies demonstrated that scene configuration and object relevancy to the task modulates the combination weights of allocentric and egocentric information. Egocentric coding for reaching is studied extensively; however, how allocentric information is coupled and used in reaching is unknown. Using a computational approach, we show that clustering mechanisms for allocentric coding combined with causal Bayesian integration of allocentric and egocentric information can account for the observed reaching behavior. To further understand allocentric coding, we propose two strategies, global vs. distributed landmark clustering (GLC vs. DLC). Both models can replicate the current data but each has distinct implications. GLC efficiently encodes the scene relative to a single virtual reference but loses all the local structure information. In contrary, DLC stores more redundant inter-object relationship information. Consequently, DLC is more sensitive to the changes of the scene. Further experiments must differentiate between the two proposed strategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信