Schrödinger的猫梦与大卫·米切尔近作中后现代启示录的政治书写

Scott A. Dimovitz
{"title":"Schrödinger的猫梦与大卫·米切尔近作中后现代启示录的政治书写","authors":"Scott A. Dimovitz","doi":"10.16995/C21.50","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the beginning, David Mitchell’s early postmodern fictions staged the impossibility of rendering the End. In each of his first three novels, Mitchell creates eschatological narratives that lack the moment of destruction: Ghostwritten points elliptically to the coming comet that an artificial intelligence, Zookeeper, will allow to destroy the earth; number9dream ends in a chapter that literally lacks letters, leaving a stark blank page after a quasi-apocalyptic earthquake hits Tokyo; and Cloud Atlas frames the event of the apocalypse without ever depicting what actually caused the deadlanding of most of the planet and the obliteration of most of humanity. This deferral of representation points to a postmodern problematic in apocalyptic figuration, and for Mitchell’s work constitutes a lack at the center of representing the real, when that reality is its own annihilation. This essay considers how Mitchell’s more recent works’ development have retroactively extended, transformed, and undermined the significance of the earlier works’ figurations of postmodern apocalypses. The Bone Clocks (2014), Sunken Garden (2013), and From Me Flows What You Call Time (2016/2114) collapse the postmodern indeterminate eschatologies that Mitchell had established in the early works, like a literary quantum superposition collapse in the Schrodinger’s Cat thought experiment. The argument demonstrates how Mitchell’s recent works have denied the individual autonomy of the universes in each narrative, thereby establishing a retroactive Mitchellverse—a shared world that undoes the postmodern indeterminacy of the unfigured apocalyptic moment in favor of an increasingly didactic political critique of apoliticism in the face of apocalyptic climate change.","PeriodicalId":272809,"journal":{"name":"C21 Literature: Journal of 21st-Century Writings","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Schrödinger’s Cat Metalepsis and the Political Unwriting of the Postmodern Apocalypse in David Mitchell’s Recent Works\",\"authors\":\"Scott A. Dimovitz\",\"doi\":\"10.16995/C21.50\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the beginning, David Mitchell’s early postmodern fictions staged the impossibility of rendering the End. In each of his first three novels, Mitchell creates eschatological narratives that lack the moment of destruction: Ghostwritten points elliptically to the coming comet that an artificial intelligence, Zookeeper, will allow to destroy the earth; number9dream ends in a chapter that literally lacks letters, leaving a stark blank page after a quasi-apocalyptic earthquake hits Tokyo; and Cloud Atlas frames the event of the apocalypse without ever depicting what actually caused the deadlanding of most of the planet and the obliteration of most of humanity. This deferral of representation points to a postmodern problematic in apocalyptic figuration, and for Mitchell’s work constitutes a lack at the center of representing the real, when that reality is its own annihilation. This essay considers how Mitchell’s more recent works’ development have retroactively extended, transformed, and undermined the significance of the earlier works’ figurations of postmodern apocalypses. The Bone Clocks (2014), Sunken Garden (2013), and From Me Flows What You Call Time (2016/2114) collapse the postmodern indeterminate eschatologies that Mitchell had established in the early works, like a literary quantum superposition collapse in the Schrodinger’s Cat thought experiment. The argument demonstrates how Mitchell’s recent works have denied the individual autonomy of the universes in each narrative, thereby establishing a retroactive Mitchellverse—a shared world that undoes the postmodern indeterminacy of the unfigured apocalyptic moment in favor of an increasingly didactic political critique of apoliticism in the face of apocalyptic climate change.\",\"PeriodicalId\":272809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"C21 Literature: Journal of 21st-Century Writings\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"C21 Literature: Journal of 21st-Century Writings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.16995/C21.50\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"C21 Literature: Journal of 21st-Century Writings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16995/C21.50","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从一开始,大卫·米切尔的早期后现代小说就上演了“结局”的不可能性。在他的前三部小说中,米切尔每一部都创造了末世论的叙事,缺乏毁灭的时刻:《鬼写》(Ghostwritten)椭圆地指出,人工智能“动物园管理员”(Zookeeper)将允许彗星毁灭地球;number9dream的结尾一章几乎没有字母,在一场近乎末日的地震袭击东京后,留下了一页空白;和《云图》描绘了世界末日的事件,却没有描绘出是什么导致了地球上大部分地区的死亡和大多数人类的灭绝。这种再现的延迟指出了启示录形象中的后现代问题,对于米切尔的作品来说,这构成了对真实再现的中心缺失,当现实本身被毁灭时。本文考虑米切尔最近作品的发展是如何追溯性地扩展、转变和削弱早期作品中后现代启示形象的重要性的。《骨钟》(2014)、《沉没花园》(2013)和《从我而来的你所谓的时间》(2016/2114)瓦解了米切尔在早期作品中建立的后现代不确定末世论,就像薛定谔猫思想实验中的文学量子叠加瓦解一样。论证了米切尔最近的作品如何在每个叙述中否认宇宙的个体自主性,从而建立了一个追溯的米切尔式的世界——一个共享的世界,它消除了未被描绘的世界末日时刻的后现代不确定性,支持面对世界末日气候变化的非政治主义的日益说教的政治批判。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Schrödinger’s Cat Metalepsis and the Political Unwriting of the Postmodern Apocalypse in David Mitchell’s Recent Works
In the beginning, David Mitchell’s early postmodern fictions staged the impossibility of rendering the End. In each of his first three novels, Mitchell creates eschatological narratives that lack the moment of destruction: Ghostwritten points elliptically to the coming comet that an artificial intelligence, Zookeeper, will allow to destroy the earth; number9dream ends in a chapter that literally lacks letters, leaving a stark blank page after a quasi-apocalyptic earthquake hits Tokyo; and Cloud Atlas frames the event of the apocalypse without ever depicting what actually caused the deadlanding of most of the planet and the obliteration of most of humanity. This deferral of representation points to a postmodern problematic in apocalyptic figuration, and for Mitchell’s work constitutes a lack at the center of representing the real, when that reality is its own annihilation. This essay considers how Mitchell’s more recent works’ development have retroactively extended, transformed, and undermined the significance of the earlier works’ figurations of postmodern apocalypses. The Bone Clocks (2014), Sunken Garden (2013), and From Me Flows What You Call Time (2016/2114) collapse the postmodern indeterminate eschatologies that Mitchell had established in the early works, like a literary quantum superposition collapse in the Schrodinger’s Cat thought experiment. The argument demonstrates how Mitchell’s recent works have denied the individual autonomy of the universes in each narrative, thereby establishing a retroactive Mitchellverse—a shared world that undoes the postmodern indeterminacy of the unfigured apocalyptic moment in favor of an increasingly didactic political critique of apoliticism in the face of apocalyptic climate change.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信