菲律宾莱特师范大学信息技术专业学生纸笔测试与网络测试的比较

L. J. Caluza
{"title":"菲律宾莱特师范大学信息技术专业学生纸笔测试与网络测试的比较","authors":"L. J. Caluza","doi":"10.7718/IAMURE.IJE.V6I1.499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evaluations, tests, and examinations are terms used to assess the knowledge or skills learned or acquired by students. Teachers must implement these tests in the most effective way. Two ways of administering the same test were investigated to gauge whether or not scores are affected by the kind of test taken. A paper pencil test and web-based test were created for the midterm examination of BS Information Technology Fourth Year students. Both examinations have the same content and each has its own policies and procedures. Furthermore, qualitative and quantitative research design was used in this study. A survey was also conducted to determine the perceptions of the respondents about the two tests and the factors that affect their scores. It was found that there was a statistically significant difference between paper pencil test and web-based test; however, there were factors that affected the scores of the respondents and these factors were very vital. The result of this research provides an additional knowledge to future researchers who will study similar topics. Keywords: Psychometrics, evaluation, test comparison, paper pencil test, web-based test,perception, time pressure test, qualitative-quantitative design, Philippines","PeriodicalId":416137,"journal":{"name":"IAMURE: International Journal of Education","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Paper Pencil Test and Web-based Test Taken by BS Information Technology Students of Leyte Normal University, Philippines\",\"authors\":\"L. J. Caluza\",\"doi\":\"10.7718/IAMURE.IJE.V6I1.499\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Evaluations, tests, and examinations are terms used to assess the knowledge or skills learned or acquired by students. Teachers must implement these tests in the most effective way. Two ways of administering the same test were investigated to gauge whether or not scores are affected by the kind of test taken. A paper pencil test and web-based test were created for the midterm examination of BS Information Technology Fourth Year students. Both examinations have the same content and each has its own policies and procedures. Furthermore, qualitative and quantitative research design was used in this study. A survey was also conducted to determine the perceptions of the respondents about the two tests and the factors that affect their scores. It was found that there was a statistically significant difference between paper pencil test and web-based test; however, there were factors that affected the scores of the respondents and these factors were very vital. The result of this research provides an additional knowledge to future researchers who will study similar topics. Keywords: Psychometrics, evaluation, test comparison, paper pencil test, web-based test,perception, time pressure test, qualitative-quantitative design, Philippines\",\"PeriodicalId\":416137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IAMURE: International Journal of Education\",\"volume\":\"56 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IAMURE: International Journal of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7718/IAMURE.IJE.V6I1.499\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IAMURE: International Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7718/IAMURE.IJE.V6I1.499","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

评估、测试和考试是用来评估学生学习或获得的知识或技能的术语。教师必须以最有效的方式实施这些测试。研究人员调查了两种进行同一项测试的方式,以衡量分数是否会受到测试类型的影响。本研究为资讯科技学士四年级学生的期中考试设计了纸笔测验和网络测验。两项考试内容相同,各有自己的政策和程序。本研究采用定性与定量相结合的研究设计。还进行了一项调查,以确定受访者对这两个测试的看法以及影响他们得分的因素。纸笔测验与网络测验的差异有统计学意义;然而,有一些因素影响了受访者的得分,这些因素是非常重要的。本研究的结果为未来研究类似课题的研究人员提供了额外的知识。关键词:心理测量学,评估,测试比较,纸笔测试,网络测试,感知,时间压力测试,定性定量设计,菲律宾
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Paper Pencil Test and Web-based Test Taken by BS Information Technology Students of Leyte Normal University, Philippines
Evaluations, tests, and examinations are terms used to assess the knowledge or skills learned or acquired by students. Teachers must implement these tests in the most effective way. Two ways of administering the same test were investigated to gauge whether or not scores are affected by the kind of test taken. A paper pencil test and web-based test were created for the midterm examination of BS Information Technology Fourth Year students. Both examinations have the same content and each has its own policies and procedures. Furthermore, qualitative and quantitative research design was used in this study. A survey was also conducted to determine the perceptions of the respondents about the two tests and the factors that affect their scores. It was found that there was a statistically significant difference between paper pencil test and web-based test; however, there were factors that affected the scores of the respondents and these factors were very vital. The result of this research provides an additional knowledge to future researchers who will study similar topics. Keywords: Psychometrics, evaluation, test comparison, paper pencil test, web-based test,perception, time pressure test, qualitative-quantitative design, Philippines
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信