Rodrigo Vilumbrales Garcia, G. Weymouth, B. Ganapathisubramani
{"title":"非定常流入条件下机动力的物理和机器学习预测","authors":"Rodrigo Vilumbrales Garcia, G. Weymouth, B. Ganapathisubramani","doi":"10.2218/marine2021.6832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multi-vessel coordination and controlled maneuvering through upstream wakes is important to a wide range of marine applications; from surface ships to autonomous underwater vehicles. In this work we study the predictive performance of physics-based and machine-learning (ML) models for unsteady inflow maneuvering forces using tandem flapping foils as a model system. Two physics-based approaches, one following simple quasi-steady assumptions and another that modifies classical Theodorsen, are found to perform fairly well when there are only mild interactions with the upstream wake, with minimum error levels of around 6%. However, this error increases to 40% when there is strong wake interaction. Three ML models were trained and tested; a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model, a Neural Ordinary Differential Equations (NODE) model, and a Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamics (SINDy) approach. We find that all three models can match the low error of the physics-based for mild inflow unsteadiness and are capable of improving the predictions in the case of strong interactions, reducing the error levels below 20%. While these ML models require substantial training data and care in choosing their meta-parameters, their predictions do prove to be more reliable for a wider range of unsteadiness conditions as well as potentially still producing human-interpretable models (in the case of SINDy), making them an interesting research direction for further study.","PeriodicalId":367395,"journal":{"name":"The 9th Conference on Computational Methods in Marine Engineering (Marine 2021)","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physics-based and Machine learning predictions of maneuvering forces in unsteady inflow conditions\",\"authors\":\"Rodrigo Vilumbrales Garcia, G. Weymouth, B. Ganapathisubramani\",\"doi\":\"10.2218/marine2021.6832\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Multi-vessel coordination and controlled maneuvering through upstream wakes is important to a wide range of marine applications; from surface ships to autonomous underwater vehicles. In this work we study the predictive performance of physics-based and machine-learning (ML) models for unsteady inflow maneuvering forces using tandem flapping foils as a model system. Two physics-based approaches, one following simple quasi-steady assumptions and another that modifies classical Theodorsen, are found to perform fairly well when there are only mild interactions with the upstream wake, with minimum error levels of around 6%. However, this error increases to 40% when there is strong wake interaction. Three ML models were trained and tested; a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model, a Neural Ordinary Differential Equations (NODE) model, and a Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamics (SINDy) approach. We find that all three models can match the low error of the physics-based for mild inflow unsteadiness and are capable of improving the predictions in the case of strong interactions, reducing the error levels below 20%. While these ML models require substantial training data and care in choosing their meta-parameters, their predictions do prove to be more reliable for a wider range of unsteadiness conditions as well as potentially still producing human-interpretable models (in the case of SINDy), making them an interesting research direction for further study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":367395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The 9th Conference on Computational Methods in Marine Engineering (Marine 2021)\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The 9th Conference on Computational Methods in Marine Engineering (Marine 2021)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2218/marine2021.6832\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The 9th Conference on Computational Methods in Marine Engineering (Marine 2021)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2218/marine2021.6832","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Physics-based and Machine learning predictions of maneuvering forces in unsteady inflow conditions
Multi-vessel coordination and controlled maneuvering through upstream wakes is important to a wide range of marine applications; from surface ships to autonomous underwater vehicles. In this work we study the predictive performance of physics-based and machine-learning (ML) models for unsteady inflow maneuvering forces using tandem flapping foils as a model system. Two physics-based approaches, one following simple quasi-steady assumptions and another that modifies classical Theodorsen, are found to perform fairly well when there are only mild interactions with the upstream wake, with minimum error levels of around 6%. However, this error increases to 40% when there is strong wake interaction. Three ML models were trained and tested; a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model, a Neural Ordinary Differential Equations (NODE) model, and a Sparse Identification of Nonlinear Dynamics (SINDy) approach. We find that all three models can match the low error of the physics-based for mild inflow unsteadiness and are capable of improving the predictions in the case of strong interactions, reducing the error levels below 20%. While these ML models require substantial training data and care in choosing their meta-parameters, their predictions do prove to be more reliable for a wider range of unsteadiness conditions as well as potentially still producing human-interpretable models (in the case of SINDy), making them an interesting research direction for further study.