司法审查和“认真审视”原则

U.S. Administrative Law eJournal Pub Date : 2007-11-10 DOI:10.12660/RDA.V275.2017.71645

P. Garry

{"title":"司法审查和“认真审视”原则","authors":"P. Garry","doi":"10.12660/RDA.V275.2017.71645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A comparison of legal precedents in judicial review and hard look doctrine. The article approaches a different vision of the origins and reasons for the development of the toughest review patterns reflects by the hard look doctrine. Comparacao de precedentes juridicos da revisao judicial e da doutrina do “hard look”. O artigo aborda uma visao diferente da origem e das razoes para o desenvolvimento dos padroes de revisao mais rigorosos refletidos pela doutrina do “hard look”.","PeriodicalId":233762,"journal":{"name":"U.S. Administrative Law eJournal","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Judicial Review and the 'Hard Look' Doctrine\",\"authors\":\"P. Garry\",\"doi\":\"10.12660/RDA.V275.2017.71645\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A comparison of legal precedents in judicial review and hard look doctrine. The article approaches a different vision of the origins and reasons for the development of the toughest review patterns reflects by the hard look doctrine. Comparacao de precedentes juridicos da revisao judicial e da doutrina do “hard look”. O artigo aborda uma visao diferente da origem e das razoes para o desenvolvimento dos padroes de revisao mais rigorosos refletidos pela doutrina do “hard look”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":233762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"U.S. Administrative Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"U.S. Administrative Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12660/RDA.V275.2017.71645\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"U.S. Administrative Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12660/RDA.V275.2017.71645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

司法审查判例与严格审查原则之比较。本文从不同的角度探讨了严格审查原则所反映的最严格审查模式的起源和发展原因。司法判例的比较与修正与司法判例的比较都是“认真审视”。在不同的数据来源的情况下，将不同的数据来源与不同的数据来源进行比较，将不同的数据来源与不同的数据来源进行比较，将不同的数据来源与不同的数据来源进行比较，将不同的数据来源进行比较，将不同的数据来源进行比较，将不同的数据来源进行比较。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Judicial Review and the 'Hard Look' Doctrine

A comparison of legal precedents in judicial review and hard look doctrine. The article approaches a different vision of the origins and reasons for the development of the toughest review patterns reflects by the hard look doctrine. Comparacao de precedentes juridicos da revisao judicial e da doutrina do “hard look”. O artigo aborda uma visao diferente da origem e das razoes para o desenvolvimento dos padroes de revisao mais rigorosos refletidos pela doutrina do “hard look”.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

U.S. Administrative Law eJournal

自引率

0.00%

发文量