分析人士认为,Van Hiele水平的学生根据Polya的步骤解决了第四级问题

Atik Robbana, S. Sunardi, Erfan Yudianto, Rachma Windasari
{"title":"分析人士认为,Van Hiele水平的学生根据Polya的步骤解决了第四级问题","authors":"Atik Robbana, S. Sunardi, Erfan Yudianto, Rachma Windasari","doi":"10.19184/jomeal.v1i3.26100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to describe student’s level thinking of understanding geometry according to van Hiele’s theory (informal deduction, deduction, and rigor) in solving of a quadrilateral problems based on Polya’s steps. The subjects of the study were 3 students Olympiad of SMPN 2 Jember, each of them have the level in informal deduction, deduction, and rigor. These students were given tests of geometry problem test at beginning and then proceeded to interview. The descriptive qualitative research was used in this study. The results showed that the subjects are able to fulfill all of the indicators according to their level in the step of understanding the problem and make arrangements. In part of carry out the plan, a student with informal deduction level is not able to solve the three indicators and a student with deduction levels is not able to solve one of the indicators, whereas the rigor’s student is not to able accomplish two indicators  according to the levels. In step of looking back, a student with informal deduction level and a student with deduction level are not capable to solve the whole of indicators, however the rigor’s student is not able to accomplish two indicators according to the levels.","PeriodicalId":308973,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematics Education and Learning","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analisis Berpikir Siswa Level Van Hiele dalam Memecahkan Masalah Segiempat Berdasarkan Langkah Polya\",\"authors\":\"Atik Robbana, S. Sunardi, Erfan Yudianto, Rachma Windasari\",\"doi\":\"10.19184/jomeal.v1i3.26100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to describe student’s level thinking of understanding geometry according to van Hiele’s theory (informal deduction, deduction, and rigor) in solving of a quadrilateral problems based on Polya’s steps. The subjects of the study were 3 students Olympiad of SMPN 2 Jember, each of them have the level in informal deduction, deduction, and rigor. These students were given tests of geometry problem test at beginning and then proceeded to interview. The descriptive qualitative research was used in this study. The results showed that the subjects are able to fulfill all of the indicators according to their level in the step of understanding the problem and make arrangements. In part of carry out the plan, a student with informal deduction level is not able to solve the three indicators and a student with deduction levels is not able to solve one of the indicators, whereas the rigor’s student is not to able accomplish two indicators  according to the levels. In step of looking back, a student with informal deduction level and a student with deduction level are not capable to solve the whole of indicators, however the rigor’s student is not able to accomplish two indicators according to the levels.\",\"PeriodicalId\":308973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mathematics Education and Learning\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mathematics Education and Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19184/jomeal.v1i3.26100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematics Education and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19184/jomeal.v1i3.26100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在描述学生在解决基于Polya步骤的四边形问题时,根据van Hiele的理论理解几何的层次思维(非正式演绎、演绎、严谨)。本研究以3名学生为研究对象,他们分别具有非正式演绎、演绎和严谨水平。这些学生首先进行几何问题测试,然后进行访谈。本研究采用描述性定性研究方法。结果表明,在认识问题和安排问题的阶段,被试能够按照自己的水平完成所有的指标。在执行计划的部分,扣级不正规的学生不能解决三个指标,扣级的学生不能解决其中一个指标,而严格的学生不能按等级完成两个指标。回过头看,非正式扣级学生和扣级学生都不能解决全部指标,而严格扣级学生则不能按等级完成两个指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analisis Berpikir Siswa Level Van Hiele dalam Memecahkan Masalah Segiempat Berdasarkan Langkah Polya
This study aims to describe student’s level thinking of understanding geometry according to van Hiele’s theory (informal deduction, deduction, and rigor) in solving of a quadrilateral problems based on Polya’s steps. The subjects of the study were 3 students Olympiad of SMPN 2 Jember, each of them have the level in informal deduction, deduction, and rigor. These students were given tests of geometry problem test at beginning and then proceeded to interview. The descriptive qualitative research was used in this study. The results showed that the subjects are able to fulfill all of the indicators according to their level in the step of understanding the problem and make arrangements. In part of carry out the plan, a student with informal deduction level is not able to solve the three indicators and a student with deduction levels is not able to solve one of the indicators, whereas the rigor’s student is not to able accomplish two indicators  according to the levels. In step of looking back, a student with informal deduction level and a student with deduction level are not capable to solve the whole of indicators, however the rigor’s student is not able to accomplish two indicators according to the levels.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信