{"title":"非线性模型预测与基于平面度的二自由度控制设计:基于工业应用的比较评价","authors":"T. Utz, V. Hagenmeyer, B. Mahn, M. Zeitz","doi":"10.1109/CCA.2006.285895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two advanced nonlinear model-based controller design methods - nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) and two-degree-of-freedom (2DOF) control with flatness-based feedforward control design and decentralized PI-controllers - are compared in view of industrial application. The comparison is carried out on a setpoint-transition of the Klatt-Engell benchmark reactor model. Based on an analysis of simulation scenarios, the controllers are compared with respect to controller performance and several robustness criteria. Furthermore, implementation issues of both controllers are discussed. The choice of the control task as well as the tuning of the controllers and the comparison methodology are strongly oriented on industrial practice.","PeriodicalId":130262,"journal":{"name":"2006 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nonlinear model predictive and flatness-based two-degree-of-freedom control design: a comparative evaluation in view of industrial application\",\"authors\":\"T. Utz, V. Hagenmeyer, B. Mahn, M. Zeitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CCA.2006.285895\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two advanced nonlinear model-based controller design methods - nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) and two-degree-of-freedom (2DOF) control with flatness-based feedforward control design and decentralized PI-controllers - are compared in view of industrial application. The comparison is carried out on a setpoint-transition of the Klatt-Engell benchmark reactor model. Based on an analysis of simulation scenarios, the controllers are compared with respect to controller performance and several robustness criteria. Furthermore, implementation issues of both controllers are discussed. The choice of the control task as well as the tuning of the controllers and the comparison methodology are strongly oriented on industrial practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":130262,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2006 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2006 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCA.2006.285895\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCA.2006.285895","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Nonlinear model predictive and flatness-based two-degree-of-freedom control design: a comparative evaluation in view of industrial application
Two advanced nonlinear model-based controller design methods - nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) and two-degree-of-freedom (2DOF) control with flatness-based feedforward control design and decentralized PI-controllers - are compared in view of industrial application. The comparison is carried out on a setpoint-transition of the Klatt-Engell benchmark reactor model. Based on an analysis of simulation scenarios, the controllers are compared with respect to controller performance and several robustness criteria. Furthermore, implementation issues of both controllers are discussed. The choice of the control task as well as the tuning of the controllers and the comparison methodology are strongly oriented on industrial practice.