{"title":"创造性破坏的障碍:大公司和非生产性战略","authors":"S. Baslandze","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3927528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter reviews recent empirical evidence on large firms and non-productive strategies that hinder creative destruction and reallocation. The focus is on three types of non-productive strategies: political connections, non-productive patenting, and anti-competitive acquisitions. Across different contexts using granular micro data sets, we overwhelmingly see that as firms gain market shares, they rely more on non-productive strategies but reduce their productive, innovation-based strategies. I discuss theoretical channels, aggregate implications, and potentials for some policies.","PeriodicalId":284021,"journal":{"name":"International Political Economy: Investment & Finance eJournal","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers to Creative Destruction: Large Firms and Non-Productive Strategies\",\"authors\":\"S. Baslandze\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3927528\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter reviews recent empirical evidence on large firms and non-productive strategies that hinder creative destruction and reallocation. The focus is on three types of non-productive strategies: political connections, non-productive patenting, and anti-competitive acquisitions. Across different contexts using granular micro data sets, we overwhelmingly see that as firms gain market shares, they rely more on non-productive strategies but reduce their productive, innovation-based strategies. I discuss theoretical channels, aggregate implications, and potentials for some policies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":284021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Political Economy: Investment & Finance eJournal\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Political Economy: Investment & Finance eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3927528\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Political Economy: Investment & Finance eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3927528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Barriers to Creative Destruction: Large Firms and Non-Productive Strategies
This chapter reviews recent empirical evidence on large firms and non-productive strategies that hinder creative destruction and reallocation. The focus is on three types of non-productive strategies: political connections, non-productive patenting, and anti-competitive acquisitions. Across different contexts using granular micro data sets, we overwhelmingly see that as firms gain market shares, they rely more on non-productive strategies but reduce their productive, innovation-based strategies. I discuss theoretical channels, aggregate implications, and potentials for some policies.