基于协同图像相似度评估的人脸识别

Deng-Yuan Huang, T. Lin, Wu-Chih Hu, Mu-Song Chen
{"title":"基于协同图像相似度评估的人脸识别","authors":"Deng-Yuan Huang, T. Lin, Wu-Chih Hu, Mu-Song Chen","doi":"10.1109/ISIC.2012.6449754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we propose an innovative approach for face recognition based on collaborative image similarity assessment (CISA). In the proposed method, the test sample is first represented by a linear combination of all the training samples for each face class. The classification task is then conducted using the similarity measures including structure similarity index measure (SSIM), root mean square (RMS), and similarity assessment value (SAV). Since CISA is only one phase, it is computationally efficient when comparing with the method of two-phase test sample sparse representation (TPTSR). To verify the performance of face classification, two popular face databases of the ORL and FERET are used. Results show that CISA is comparable with TPTSR on the classification rates for ORL database. However, CISA greatly outperforms TPTSR on the evaluation of the FERET database. Moreover, only 276.4ms on an average is required for CISA in the classification of each test sample but it needs 800.8ms for TPTSR.","PeriodicalId":393653,"journal":{"name":"2012 International Conference on Information Security and Intelligent Control","volume":"246 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Face recognition based on collaborative image similarity assessment\",\"authors\":\"Deng-Yuan Huang, T. Lin, Wu-Chih Hu, Mu-Song Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISIC.2012.6449754\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we propose an innovative approach for face recognition based on collaborative image similarity assessment (CISA). In the proposed method, the test sample is first represented by a linear combination of all the training samples for each face class. The classification task is then conducted using the similarity measures including structure similarity index measure (SSIM), root mean square (RMS), and similarity assessment value (SAV). Since CISA is only one phase, it is computationally efficient when comparing with the method of two-phase test sample sparse representation (TPTSR). To verify the performance of face classification, two popular face databases of the ORL and FERET are used. Results show that CISA is comparable with TPTSR on the classification rates for ORL database. However, CISA greatly outperforms TPTSR on the evaluation of the FERET database. Moreover, only 276.4ms on an average is required for CISA in the classification of each test sample but it needs 800.8ms for TPTSR.\",\"PeriodicalId\":393653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 International Conference on Information Security and Intelligent Control\",\"volume\":\"246 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 International Conference on Information Security and Intelligent Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIC.2012.6449754\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 International Conference on Information Security and Intelligent Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIC.2012.6449754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文提出了一种基于协同图像相似性评估(CISA)的人脸识别方法。在提出的方法中,测试样本首先由每个人脸类的所有训练样本的线性组合表示。然后使用结构相似度指数(SSIM)、均方根(RMS)和相似度评估值(SAV)等相似度度量进行分类任务。由于CISA仅为一阶段,因此与两阶段测试样本稀疏表示(TPTSR)方法相比,计算效率更高。为了验证人脸分类的性能,使用了两种流行的人脸数据库:ORL和FERET。结果表明,CISA在ORL数据库的分类率上与tptr相当。然而,CISA在FERET数据库的评估上大大优于tptr。此外,CISA对每个测试样本的分类平均只需要276.4ms,而TPTSR则需要800.8ms。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Face recognition based on collaborative image similarity assessment
In this paper, we propose an innovative approach for face recognition based on collaborative image similarity assessment (CISA). In the proposed method, the test sample is first represented by a linear combination of all the training samples for each face class. The classification task is then conducted using the similarity measures including structure similarity index measure (SSIM), root mean square (RMS), and similarity assessment value (SAV). Since CISA is only one phase, it is computationally efficient when comparing with the method of two-phase test sample sparse representation (TPTSR). To verify the performance of face classification, two popular face databases of the ORL and FERET are used. Results show that CISA is comparable with TPTSR on the classification rates for ORL database. However, CISA greatly outperforms TPTSR on the evaluation of the FERET database. Moreover, only 276.4ms on an average is required for CISA in the classification of each test sample but it needs 800.8ms for TPTSR.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信