G. Eklund, A. Satrapinski, E. Suomalainen, Y. Semenov
{"title":"不同电感实现方法的比较","authors":"G. Eklund, A. Satrapinski, E. Suomalainen, Y. Semenov","doi":"10.1109/CPEM.2010.5543638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A comparison of inductance realisation at 100 mH was carried out in October –November 2009 at MIKES and SP. The measurand was a four terminal pair toroidal inductor measured at three frequencies 400 Hz, 1000 Hz and 1591 Hz. Realisations by series and parallel resonance methods and by a 2 DVM sampling method were used. The results showed agreement within combined expanded uncertainty.","PeriodicalId":222495,"journal":{"name":"CPEM 2010","volume":"304 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of different methods of inductance realisation\",\"authors\":\"G. Eklund, A. Satrapinski, E. Suomalainen, Y. Semenov\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CPEM.2010.5543638\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A comparison of inductance realisation at 100 mH was carried out in October –November 2009 at MIKES and SP. The measurand was a four terminal pair toroidal inductor measured at three frequencies 400 Hz, 1000 Hz and 1591 Hz. Realisations by series and parallel resonance methods and by a 2 DVM sampling method were used. The results showed agreement within combined expanded uncertainty.\",\"PeriodicalId\":222495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CPEM 2010\",\"volume\":\"304 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CPEM 2010\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CPEM.2010.5543638\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CPEM 2010","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CPEM.2010.5543638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of different methods of inductance realisation
A comparison of inductance realisation at 100 mH was carried out in October –November 2009 at MIKES and SP. The measurand was a four terminal pair toroidal inductor measured at three frequencies 400 Hz, 1000 Hz and 1591 Hz. Realisations by series and parallel resonance methods and by a 2 DVM sampling method were used. The results showed agreement within combined expanded uncertainty.