长途运输电动动力总成概念与传统动力总成概念的技术和总拥有成本分析

A. Kampker, Kai Krcisköther, M. Büning, José Guillermo Dorantes Gómez
{"title":"长途运输电动动力总成概念与传统动力总成概念的技术和总拥有成本分析","authors":"A. Kampker, Kai Krcisköther, M. Büning, José Guillermo Dorantes Gómez","doi":"10.1109/EDPC.2018.8658298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Light and medium-duty vehicles have been so far the main focus of alternative drive research and development projects. The reasons for this are divided into two components: a global regulatory push to reduce heavy-duty traffic and emissions in urban areas, and how similar light and medium-duty vehicles are to the far more technologically mature personal electric vehicles. It is until very recently that energy storing technology has matured enough to make long-haul heavy-duty electric trucks a viable alternative to conventional trucks. However, the extent to which trucks provide technological and economic advantages over their fossil fuel counterparts is still in question. Therefore, this research work presents a technological and economic comparison of diverse electric powertrain configurations of long-haul heavy-duty trucks to a standard diesel engine truck of the same class. In this paper, a use case is defined to serve as the framework for all comparisons. The input for this use case has four components: the simulated drive cycle, the vehicle, the powertrain technical specifications and the energy source with auxiliary loads. Calculations are then carried out in a model made in this publication for a powertrain that can fulfill the requirements of the use case. Afterward, based on these results, a TCO analysis focused on energy consumption and maintenance, extrapolated through the expected life of the vehicle is presented. Finally, the implications on electric drives production of an increased adoption of such heavy class vehicles are commented.","PeriodicalId":358881,"journal":{"name":"2018 8th International Electric Drives Production Conference (EDPC)","volume":"214 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technological and Total Cost of Ownership Analysis of Electric Powertrain Concepts for Long-Haul Transport in Comparison to Traditional Powertrain Concepts\",\"authors\":\"A. Kampker, Kai Krcisköther, M. Büning, José Guillermo Dorantes Gómez\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EDPC.2018.8658298\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Light and medium-duty vehicles have been so far the main focus of alternative drive research and development projects. The reasons for this are divided into two components: a global regulatory push to reduce heavy-duty traffic and emissions in urban areas, and how similar light and medium-duty vehicles are to the far more technologically mature personal electric vehicles. It is until very recently that energy storing technology has matured enough to make long-haul heavy-duty electric trucks a viable alternative to conventional trucks. However, the extent to which trucks provide technological and economic advantages over their fossil fuel counterparts is still in question. Therefore, this research work presents a technological and economic comparison of diverse electric powertrain configurations of long-haul heavy-duty trucks to a standard diesel engine truck of the same class. In this paper, a use case is defined to serve as the framework for all comparisons. The input for this use case has four components: the simulated drive cycle, the vehicle, the powertrain technical specifications and the energy source with auxiliary loads. Calculations are then carried out in a model made in this publication for a powertrain that can fulfill the requirements of the use case. Afterward, based on these results, a TCO analysis focused on energy consumption and maintenance, extrapolated through the expected life of the vehicle is presented. Finally, the implications on electric drives production of an increased adoption of such heavy class vehicles are commented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":358881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 8th International Electric Drives Production Conference (EDPC)\",\"volume\":\"214 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 8th International Electric Drives Production Conference (EDPC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDPC.2018.8658298\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 8th International Electric Drives Production Conference (EDPC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDPC.2018.8658298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

到目前为止,轻型和中型车辆一直是替代驱动研究和开发项目的主要焦点。造成这种情况的原因分为两个部分:全球监管机构推动减少城市地区的重型交通和排放,以及轻型和中型车辆与技术成熟得多的个人电动汽车有多相似。直到最近,储能技术才足够成熟,使长途重型电动卡车成为传统卡车的可行替代品。然而,与化石燃料相比,卡车在技术和经济上的优势到底有多大,仍然是个问题。因此,本研究工作将长途重型卡车的不同电动动力系统配置与同一级别的标准柴油发动机卡车进行技术和经济比较。在本文中,定义了一个用例作为所有比较的框架。这个用例的输入有四个组成部分:模拟驾驶循环、车辆、动力系统技术规范和带辅助负载的能源。然后在本出版物中制作的模型中进行计算,以获得能够满足用例要求的动力总成。然后,基于这些结果,提出了基于能源消耗和维护的TCO分析,并通过车辆的预期寿命来推断。最后,对电力驱动生产增加采用这种重型车辆的影响进行了评论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Technological and Total Cost of Ownership Analysis of Electric Powertrain Concepts for Long-Haul Transport in Comparison to Traditional Powertrain Concepts
Light and medium-duty vehicles have been so far the main focus of alternative drive research and development projects. The reasons for this are divided into two components: a global regulatory push to reduce heavy-duty traffic and emissions in urban areas, and how similar light and medium-duty vehicles are to the far more technologically mature personal electric vehicles. It is until very recently that energy storing technology has matured enough to make long-haul heavy-duty electric trucks a viable alternative to conventional trucks. However, the extent to which trucks provide technological and economic advantages over their fossil fuel counterparts is still in question. Therefore, this research work presents a technological and economic comparison of diverse electric powertrain configurations of long-haul heavy-duty trucks to a standard diesel engine truck of the same class. In this paper, a use case is defined to serve as the framework for all comparisons. The input for this use case has four components: the simulated drive cycle, the vehicle, the powertrain technical specifications and the energy source with auxiliary loads. Calculations are then carried out in a model made in this publication for a powertrain that can fulfill the requirements of the use case. Afterward, based on these results, a TCO analysis focused on energy consumption and maintenance, extrapolated through the expected life of the vehicle is presented. Finally, the implications on electric drives production of an increased adoption of such heavy class vehicles are commented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信