{"title":"八月光中的思想模式","authors":"R. Wilson","doi":"10.1353/RMR.1970.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Light In August is not everyone's idea of a funny novel. Most readers would no doubt agree with Kazin, Sewall, and other critics, as well as with Faulkner himself, that it is essentially a \"tragic\" story.' Certainly, it is suffused with pathos, sorrow, and most of the variables of tragedy. Nonetheless, there are, I believe, several comic elements in the novel which have been generally neglected. Taken in isolation, some of the novel's comic situations and characterizations might be passed over, but in their totality they are a significant element in its structure. I should like to argue that in particular there are ironic patterns which are central to the major concerns of Light In August. \"Irony,\" of course, is not necessarily comic: the peripeteia of Greek tragedy, the \"irony of events\" which defines the novels of Hardy, and the dramatic reversals of Shakespeare's tragedies are all proofs that \"irony\" is a genuinely amphibian term existing healthily in both the comic and non-comic experience of literature. For the purposes of this paper, however, I shall take \"irony\" to be intimately related to, if not inseparable from, the comic experience. The peculiar kinds of Faulknerian irony which I am going to discuss have more of Cervantes or Ariosto in them than Sophocles or Shakespeare. They are ironies not merely of reversal and frustration but of circularity as well. Faulkner's characters, in the moment of their thwarted, frustrated expectations, resemble less an Oedipus or a Lear confronting an awesome destiny-the dreadful image of some promised end-than they do a Quixote confronting the empty air of vanished giants or a Ruggiero clasping the empty space left by an invisible Angelica. That is, they are left not with the compensation of something exterior to themselves, both awesome and sacred, but with nothing but themselves and their own self-consciousness. Seen in another perspective, the ironies of Light In August recall the frustration of characters in works by Sartre, Camus, and Pynchon, among others. They are frustrations which are defined by their interiority, solitariness, and selffocusing. There are a number of ironic situations in Light In August, all of which involve the experience of an unforeseen event quite different from that which has been expected. For example, when Lucas Burch confronts Lena","PeriodicalId":344945,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association","volume":"214 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1970-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Pattern of Thought in Light in August\",\"authors\":\"R. Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/RMR.1970.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Light In August is not everyone's idea of a funny novel. Most readers would no doubt agree with Kazin, Sewall, and other critics, as well as with Faulkner himself, that it is essentially a \\\"tragic\\\" story.' Certainly, it is suffused with pathos, sorrow, and most of the variables of tragedy. Nonetheless, there are, I believe, several comic elements in the novel which have been generally neglected. Taken in isolation, some of the novel's comic situations and characterizations might be passed over, but in their totality they are a significant element in its structure. I should like to argue that in particular there are ironic patterns which are central to the major concerns of Light In August. \\\"Irony,\\\" of course, is not necessarily comic: the peripeteia of Greek tragedy, the \\\"irony of events\\\" which defines the novels of Hardy, and the dramatic reversals of Shakespeare's tragedies are all proofs that \\\"irony\\\" is a genuinely amphibian term existing healthily in both the comic and non-comic experience of literature. For the purposes of this paper, however, I shall take \\\"irony\\\" to be intimately related to, if not inseparable from, the comic experience. The peculiar kinds of Faulknerian irony which I am going to discuss have more of Cervantes or Ariosto in them than Sophocles or Shakespeare. They are ironies not merely of reversal and frustration but of circularity as well. Faulkner's characters, in the moment of their thwarted, frustrated expectations, resemble less an Oedipus or a Lear confronting an awesome destiny-the dreadful image of some promised end-than they do a Quixote confronting the empty air of vanished giants or a Ruggiero clasping the empty space left by an invisible Angelica. That is, they are left not with the compensation of something exterior to themselves, both awesome and sacred, but with nothing but themselves and their own self-consciousness. Seen in another perspective, the ironies of Light In August recall the frustration of characters in works by Sartre, Camus, and Pynchon, among others. They are frustrations which are defined by their interiority, solitariness, and selffocusing. There are a number of ironic situations in Light In August, all of which involve the experience of an unforeseen event quite different from that which has been expected. For example, when Lucas Burch confronts Lena\",\"PeriodicalId\":344945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association\",\"volume\":\"214 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1970-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/RMR.1970.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/RMR.1970.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Light In August is not everyone's idea of a funny novel. Most readers would no doubt agree with Kazin, Sewall, and other critics, as well as with Faulkner himself, that it is essentially a "tragic" story.' Certainly, it is suffused with pathos, sorrow, and most of the variables of tragedy. Nonetheless, there are, I believe, several comic elements in the novel which have been generally neglected. Taken in isolation, some of the novel's comic situations and characterizations might be passed over, but in their totality they are a significant element in its structure. I should like to argue that in particular there are ironic patterns which are central to the major concerns of Light In August. "Irony," of course, is not necessarily comic: the peripeteia of Greek tragedy, the "irony of events" which defines the novels of Hardy, and the dramatic reversals of Shakespeare's tragedies are all proofs that "irony" is a genuinely amphibian term existing healthily in both the comic and non-comic experience of literature. For the purposes of this paper, however, I shall take "irony" to be intimately related to, if not inseparable from, the comic experience. The peculiar kinds of Faulknerian irony which I am going to discuss have more of Cervantes or Ariosto in them than Sophocles or Shakespeare. They are ironies not merely of reversal and frustration but of circularity as well. Faulkner's characters, in the moment of their thwarted, frustrated expectations, resemble less an Oedipus or a Lear confronting an awesome destiny-the dreadful image of some promised end-than they do a Quixote confronting the empty air of vanished giants or a Ruggiero clasping the empty space left by an invisible Angelica. That is, they are left not with the compensation of something exterior to themselves, both awesome and sacred, but with nothing but themselves and their own self-consciousness. Seen in another perspective, the ironies of Light In August recall the frustration of characters in works by Sartre, Camus, and Pynchon, among others. They are frustrations which are defined by their interiority, solitariness, and selffocusing. There are a number of ironic situations in Light In August, all of which involve the experience of an unforeseen event quite different from that which has been expected. For example, when Lucas Burch confronts Lena