八月光中的思想模式

R. Wilson
{"title":"八月光中的思想模式","authors":"R. Wilson","doi":"10.1353/RMR.1970.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Light In August is not everyone's idea of a funny novel. Most readers would no doubt agree with Kazin, Sewall, and other critics, as well as with Faulkner himself, that it is essentially a \"tragic\" story.' Certainly, it is suffused with pathos, sorrow, and most of the variables of tragedy. Nonetheless, there are, I believe, several comic elements in the novel which have been generally neglected. Taken in isolation, some of the novel's comic situations and characterizations might be passed over, but in their totality they are a significant element in its structure. I should like to argue that in particular there are ironic patterns which are central to the major concerns of Light In August. \"Irony,\" of course, is not necessarily comic: the peripeteia of Greek tragedy, the \"irony of events\" which defines the novels of Hardy, and the dramatic reversals of Shakespeare's tragedies are all proofs that \"irony\" is a genuinely amphibian term existing healthily in both the comic and non-comic experience of literature. For the purposes of this paper, however, I shall take \"irony\" to be intimately related to, if not inseparable from, the comic experience. The peculiar kinds of Faulknerian irony which I am going to discuss have more of Cervantes or Ariosto in them than Sophocles or Shakespeare. They are ironies not merely of reversal and frustration but of circularity as well. Faulkner's characters, in the moment of their thwarted, frustrated expectations, resemble less an Oedipus or a Lear confronting an awesome destiny-the dreadful image of some promised end-than they do a Quixote confronting the empty air of vanished giants or a Ruggiero clasping the empty space left by an invisible Angelica. That is, they are left not with the compensation of something exterior to themselves, both awesome and sacred, but with nothing but themselves and their own self-consciousness. Seen in another perspective, the ironies of Light In August recall the frustration of characters in works by Sartre, Camus, and Pynchon, among others. They are frustrations which are defined by their interiority, solitariness, and selffocusing. There are a number of ironic situations in Light In August, all of which involve the experience of an unforeseen event quite different from that which has been expected. For example, when Lucas Burch confronts Lena","PeriodicalId":344945,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association","volume":"214 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1970-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Pattern of Thought in Light in August\",\"authors\":\"R. Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/RMR.1970.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Light In August is not everyone's idea of a funny novel. Most readers would no doubt agree with Kazin, Sewall, and other critics, as well as with Faulkner himself, that it is essentially a \\\"tragic\\\" story.' Certainly, it is suffused with pathos, sorrow, and most of the variables of tragedy. Nonetheless, there are, I believe, several comic elements in the novel which have been generally neglected. Taken in isolation, some of the novel's comic situations and characterizations might be passed over, but in their totality they are a significant element in its structure. I should like to argue that in particular there are ironic patterns which are central to the major concerns of Light In August. \\\"Irony,\\\" of course, is not necessarily comic: the peripeteia of Greek tragedy, the \\\"irony of events\\\" which defines the novels of Hardy, and the dramatic reversals of Shakespeare's tragedies are all proofs that \\\"irony\\\" is a genuinely amphibian term existing healthily in both the comic and non-comic experience of literature. For the purposes of this paper, however, I shall take \\\"irony\\\" to be intimately related to, if not inseparable from, the comic experience. The peculiar kinds of Faulknerian irony which I am going to discuss have more of Cervantes or Ariosto in them than Sophocles or Shakespeare. They are ironies not merely of reversal and frustration but of circularity as well. Faulkner's characters, in the moment of their thwarted, frustrated expectations, resemble less an Oedipus or a Lear confronting an awesome destiny-the dreadful image of some promised end-than they do a Quixote confronting the empty air of vanished giants or a Ruggiero clasping the empty space left by an invisible Angelica. That is, they are left not with the compensation of something exterior to themselves, both awesome and sacred, but with nothing but themselves and their own self-consciousness. Seen in another perspective, the ironies of Light In August recall the frustration of characters in works by Sartre, Camus, and Pynchon, among others. They are frustrations which are defined by their interiority, solitariness, and selffocusing. There are a number of ironic situations in Light In August, all of which involve the experience of an unforeseen event quite different from that which has been expected. For example, when Lucas Burch confronts Lena\",\"PeriodicalId\":344945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association\",\"volume\":\"214 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1970-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/RMR.1970.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/RMR.1970.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《八月之光》并不是每个人都认为是一本有趣的小说。大多数读者无疑会同意卡津、休厄尔和其他评论家的观点,以及福克纳本人的观点,即它本质上是一个“悲剧”故事。当然,它充满了悲情、悲伤和悲剧的大部分变数。尽管如此,我相信这部小说中有几个喜剧元素通常被忽视了。单独来看,这部小说中的一些喜剧情节和人物刻画可能会被忽略,但总的来说,它们是小说结构中的一个重要元素。我想特别指出的是,有一些讽刺的模式是《八月之光》主要关注的核心。当然,“反讽”并不一定是喜剧性的:希腊悲剧的转折,定义哈代小说的“事件的反讽”,莎士比亚悲剧的戏剧性逆转,都证明了“反讽”是一个真正的两栖术语,健康地存在于喜剧和非喜剧的文学经验中。然而,为了本文的目的,我将把“讽刺”看作是与喜剧经验密切相关的,如果不是不可分割的。我将要讨论的福克纳式的特殊讽刺更多的是塞万提斯或阿里奥斯托的作品而不是索福克勒斯或莎士比亚的作品。它们不仅是对逆转和挫折的讽刺,也是对循环的讽刺。福克纳笔下的人物,在他们被挫败、沮丧的期望的时刻,不像俄狄浦斯或李尔王面对可怕的命运——某种承诺的结局的可怕形象,而更像堂吉诃德面对消失的巨人的空虚,或鲁杰罗紧握着看不见的安吉莉卡留下的空白。也就是说,他们没有得到外在的东西的补偿,既可怕又神圣,除了他们自己和他们自己的自我意识,什么也没有。从另一个角度看,《八月之光》的讽刺让人想起萨特、加缪、品钦等人作品中人物的挫败感。他们是由他们的内在、孤独和自我关注所定义的挫折。在八月之光中有许多具有讽刺意味的情况,所有这些都涉及到一个与预期完全不同的不可预见事件的经历。比如卢卡斯·伯奇面对莉娜的时候
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Pattern of Thought in Light in August
Light In August is not everyone's idea of a funny novel. Most readers would no doubt agree with Kazin, Sewall, and other critics, as well as with Faulkner himself, that it is essentially a "tragic" story.' Certainly, it is suffused with pathos, sorrow, and most of the variables of tragedy. Nonetheless, there are, I believe, several comic elements in the novel which have been generally neglected. Taken in isolation, some of the novel's comic situations and characterizations might be passed over, but in their totality they are a significant element in its structure. I should like to argue that in particular there are ironic patterns which are central to the major concerns of Light In August. "Irony," of course, is not necessarily comic: the peripeteia of Greek tragedy, the "irony of events" which defines the novels of Hardy, and the dramatic reversals of Shakespeare's tragedies are all proofs that "irony" is a genuinely amphibian term existing healthily in both the comic and non-comic experience of literature. For the purposes of this paper, however, I shall take "irony" to be intimately related to, if not inseparable from, the comic experience. The peculiar kinds of Faulknerian irony which I am going to discuss have more of Cervantes or Ariosto in them than Sophocles or Shakespeare. They are ironies not merely of reversal and frustration but of circularity as well. Faulkner's characters, in the moment of their thwarted, frustrated expectations, resemble less an Oedipus or a Lear confronting an awesome destiny-the dreadful image of some promised end-than they do a Quixote confronting the empty air of vanished giants or a Ruggiero clasping the empty space left by an invisible Angelica. That is, they are left not with the compensation of something exterior to themselves, both awesome and sacred, but with nothing but themselves and their own self-consciousness. Seen in another perspective, the ironies of Light In August recall the frustration of characters in works by Sartre, Camus, and Pynchon, among others. They are frustrations which are defined by their interiority, solitariness, and selffocusing. There are a number of ironic situations in Light In August, all of which involve the experience of an unforeseen event quite different from that which has been expected. For example, when Lucas Burch confronts Lena
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信