对有腐败行为的人处以刑罚的社会救济基金

Kevin Umbu Hiwa Ninggeding, I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha, Ni Made Sukaryati Karma
{"title":"对有腐败行为的人处以刑罚的社会救济基金","authors":"Kevin Umbu Hiwa Ninggeding, I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha, Ni Made Sukaryati Karma","doi":"10.22225/juinhum.3.1.4642.78-82","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The amendment of Law Number 31 of 1999 to Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption is currently not in accordance with the development of lawsuits in the eyes of the public. Therefore, this research aims to analyse the legal arrangements for cases of corruption in social assistance funds and to examine the application of sanctions to perpetrators of corruption in social assistance funds. In this review, this research uses a normative type of research, using a statutory approach that investigates all legal aspects that arise. Primary law sources come from laws and regulations related to cases, while secondary law comes from legal books and journals that are correlated with issues in research. Data collection techniques by reading, recording, quoting, summarizing, and reviewing information and explanations collected from both legislation and literature. The results of the research reveal that in the legal guidelines Number 31 of 1999 amendments to Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption have not explicitly regulated violations of cases of corruption in social assistance funds, but perpetrators of violations of social assistance corruption can be sentenced to death on the grounds that the suspect of corruption in social assistance funds made a mistake by taking funds for social assistance for personal or group interests so as to fulfil the elements contained in Article 2 paragraph (2) of Law 31 of 1999 as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption.","PeriodicalId":197649,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sanksi Pidana terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dana Bantuan Sosial\",\"authors\":\"Kevin Umbu Hiwa Ninggeding, I Nyoman Gede Sugiartha, Ni Made Sukaryati Karma\",\"doi\":\"10.22225/juinhum.3.1.4642.78-82\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The amendment of Law Number 31 of 1999 to Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption is currently not in accordance with the development of lawsuits in the eyes of the public. Therefore, this research aims to analyse the legal arrangements for cases of corruption in social assistance funds and to examine the application of sanctions to perpetrators of corruption in social assistance funds. In this review, this research uses a normative type of research, using a statutory approach that investigates all legal aspects that arise. Primary law sources come from laws and regulations related to cases, while secondary law comes from legal books and journals that are correlated with issues in research. Data collection techniques by reading, recording, quoting, summarizing, and reviewing information and explanations collected from both legislation and literature. The results of the research reveal that in the legal guidelines Number 31 of 1999 amendments to Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption have not explicitly regulated violations of cases of corruption in social assistance funds, but perpetrators of violations of social assistance corruption can be sentenced to death on the grounds that the suspect of corruption in social assistance funds made a mistake by taking funds for social assistance for personal or group interests so as to fulfil the elements contained in Article 2 paragraph (2) of Law 31 of 1999 as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption.\",\"PeriodicalId\":197649,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.3.1.4642.78-82\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22225/juinhum.3.1.4642.78-82","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目前,将1999年第31号法修改为2001年第20号法的《铲除腐败犯罪行为法》与国民眼中的诉讼发展不相符。因此,本研究旨在分析社会救助基金腐败案件的法律安排,并审查对社会救助基金腐败肇事者的制裁适用情况。在本综述中,本研究采用规范性研究,使用法定方法调查出现的所有法律方面。初级法源来自与案件相关的法律法规,次级法源来自与研究问题相关的法律书籍和期刊。通过阅读、记录、引用、总结和审查从立法和文献中收集的信息和解释来收集数据的技术。研究结果表明,在1999年第31号法律指导方针中,对2001年关于根除腐败犯罪行为的第20号法律的修正案没有明确规定违反社会援助基金腐败案件的行为。但违反社会援助腐败行为的行为人可被判处死刑,理由是社会援助基金腐败犯罪嫌疑人犯了一个错误,即为个人或团体利益挪用社会援助资金,以履行1999年第31号法第2条第(2)款所载的要素,并经2001年关于根除腐败犯罪行为的第20号法修正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sanksi Pidana terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dana Bantuan Sosial
The amendment of Law Number 31 of 1999 to Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption is currently not in accordance with the development of lawsuits in the eyes of the public. Therefore, this research aims to analyse the legal arrangements for cases of corruption in social assistance funds and to examine the application of sanctions to perpetrators of corruption in social assistance funds. In this review, this research uses a normative type of research, using a statutory approach that investigates all legal aspects that arise. Primary law sources come from laws and regulations related to cases, while secondary law comes from legal books and journals that are correlated with issues in research. Data collection techniques by reading, recording, quoting, summarizing, and reviewing information and explanations collected from both legislation and literature. The results of the research reveal that in the legal guidelines Number 31 of 1999 amendments to Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption have not explicitly regulated violations of cases of corruption in social assistance funds, but perpetrators of violations of social assistance corruption can be sentenced to death on the grounds that the suspect of corruption in social assistance funds made a mistake by taking funds for social assistance for personal or group interests so as to fulfil the elements contained in Article 2 paragraph (2) of Law 31 of 1999 as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信