第二抵押权人与代位权保险承运人优先权之争

LSN: Mortgages (Sub-Topic) Pub Date : 2011-11-07 DOI:10.2139/SSRN.1956213

R. Bernhardt

{"title":"第二抵押权人与代位权保险承运人优先权之争","authors":"R. Bernhardt","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1956213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Analysis of a recent decision holding that the insurance carrier who had paid the first mortgagee had a superior right to the remaining value of the property by virtue of subrogation than did the second mortgagee, even though the second was also insured under the same policy.","PeriodicalId":113000,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Mortgages (Sub-Topic)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Priority Fight Between the Second Mortgagee and the Subrogated Insurance Carrier\",\"authors\":\"R. Bernhardt\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1956213\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Analysis of a recent decision holding that the insurance carrier who had paid the first mortgagee had a superior right to the remaining value of the property by virtue of subrogation than did the second mortgagee, even though the second was also insured under the same policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":113000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Mortgages (Sub-Topic)\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Mortgages (Sub-Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1956213\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Mortgages (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1956213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

对最近一项判决的分析认为，由于代位求偿，向第一抵押权人付款的保险承运人对财产的剩余价值享有比第二抵押权人更高的权利，即使第二抵押权人也在同一保险单下投保。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Priority Fight Between the Second Mortgagee and the Subrogated Insurance Carrier

Analysis of a recent decision holding that the insurance carrier who had paid the first mortgagee had a superior right to the remaining value of the property by virtue of subrogation than did the second mortgagee, even though the second was also insured under the same policy.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

LSN: Mortgages (Sub-Topic)

自引率

0.00%

发文量