{"title":"由跨种族样本组成的大规模GWAS荟萃分析确定了BMI的各种遗传信号","authors":"Yiyun Chen, Zhenxiao Xu, An-Di Zhao","doi":"10.56028/fesr.1.1.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the development of computational power and statistical theories, Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have constantly been improved to gain higher power with reduced bias. GWAS identify hundreds of susceptibility loci body mass index in various populations such as European-ancestry, or Asian groups. Meta-analysis enables us to incorporate statistical results from various studies to detect more genetics signals in GWAS, as well as discover different signals from cis- or trans-ethnic groups. Here we combined data from three sources of large-scale genetics studies: UK Biobank, GIANT consortium, and a famous Japanese study. Among over two million candidate SNPs, we successfully detected 686 significant SNPs after Bonferroni correction (P < 2.5*10^-8), with most of them being detected previously. The top five SNPs are: “rs1558902” (P value = 2.394*10^-36), “rs1421085” (P value = 4.152*10^-36), “rs2237897” (P value = 2.542*10^-32), “rs2237896” (P value = 3.966*10^-32), “rs7202116” (P value = 2.702*10^-31). Although the total number of variants identified by the meta-analysis is lower than the Japanese population-based association study, meta-analysis successfully identifies several new loci not captured by the single-group association study. We also explored the original summary statistics datasets and conducted analysis to compare the statistical results from different populations separately.","PeriodicalId":314661,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Engineering and Scientific Research","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Large-scale GWAS meta-analysis consisting of trans-ethnic samples identifies various genetic signals on BMI\",\"authors\":\"Yiyun Chen, Zhenxiao Xu, An-Di Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.56028/fesr.1.1.21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Due to the development of computational power and statistical theories, Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have constantly been improved to gain higher power with reduced bias. GWAS identify hundreds of susceptibility loci body mass index in various populations such as European-ancestry, or Asian groups. Meta-analysis enables us to incorporate statistical results from various studies to detect more genetics signals in GWAS, as well as discover different signals from cis- or trans-ethnic groups. Here we combined data from three sources of large-scale genetics studies: UK Biobank, GIANT consortium, and a famous Japanese study. Among over two million candidate SNPs, we successfully detected 686 significant SNPs after Bonferroni correction (P < 2.5*10^-8), with most of them being detected previously. The top five SNPs are: “rs1558902” (P value = 2.394*10^-36), “rs1421085” (P value = 4.152*10^-36), “rs2237897” (P value = 2.542*10^-32), “rs2237896” (P value = 3.966*10^-32), “rs7202116” (P value = 2.702*10^-31). Although the total number of variants identified by the meta-analysis is lower than the Japanese population-based association study, meta-analysis successfully identifies several new loci not captured by the single-group association study. We also explored the original summary statistics datasets and conducted analysis to compare the statistical results from different populations separately.\",\"PeriodicalId\":314661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers of Engineering and Scientific Research\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers of Engineering and Scientific Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56028/fesr.1.1.21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Engineering and Scientific Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56028/fesr.1.1.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Large-scale GWAS meta-analysis consisting of trans-ethnic samples identifies various genetic signals on BMI
Due to the development of computational power and statistical theories, Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have constantly been improved to gain higher power with reduced bias. GWAS identify hundreds of susceptibility loci body mass index in various populations such as European-ancestry, or Asian groups. Meta-analysis enables us to incorporate statistical results from various studies to detect more genetics signals in GWAS, as well as discover different signals from cis- or trans-ethnic groups. Here we combined data from three sources of large-scale genetics studies: UK Biobank, GIANT consortium, and a famous Japanese study. Among over two million candidate SNPs, we successfully detected 686 significant SNPs after Bonferroni correction (P < 2.5*10^-8), with most of them being detected previously. The top five SNPs are: “rs1558902” (P value = 2.394*10^-36), “rs1421085” (P value = 4.152*10^-36), “rs2237897” (P value = 2.542*10^-32), “rs2237896” (P value = 3.966*10^-32), “rs7202116” (P value = 2.702*10^-31). Although the total number of variants identified by the meta-analysis is lower than the Japanese population-based association study, meta-analysis successfully identifies several new loci not captured by the single-group association study. We also explored the original summary statistics datasets and conducted analysis to compare the statistical results from different populations separately.