对普遍依赖中意合的充分解释

Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Universal Dependencies (UDW, SyntaxFest 2019) Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.18653/v1/W19-8011

Lars Ahrenberg

{"title":"对普遍依赖中意合的充分解释","authors":"Lars Ahrenberg","doi":"10.18653/v1/W19-8011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The parataxis relation as defined for Universal Dependencies 2.0 is general and, for this reason, sometimes hard to distinguish from competing analyses, such as coordination, conj, or apposition, appos. The specific subtypes that are listed for parataxis are also quite different in character. In this study we first show that the actual practice by UD-annotators is varied, using the parallel UD (PUD-) treebanks as data. We then review the current definitions and guidelines and suggest improvements.","PeriodicalId":294555,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Universal Dependencies (UDW, SyntaxFest 2019)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards an adequate account of parataxis in Universal Dependencies\",\"authors\":\"Lars Ahrenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.18653/v1/W19-8011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The parataxis relation as defined for Universal Dependencies 2.0 is general and, for this reason, sometimes hard to distinguish from competing analyses, such as coordination, conj, or apposition, appos. The specific subtypes that are listed for parataxis are also quite different in character. In this study we first show that the actual practice by UD-annotators is varied, using the parallel UD (PUD-) treebanks as data. We then review the current definitions and guidelines and suggest improvements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":294555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Universal Dependencies (UDW, SyntaxFest 2019)\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Universal Dependencies (UDW, SyntaxFest 2019)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W19-8011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Universal Dependencies (UDW, SyntaxFest 2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W19-8011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

为Universal Dependencies 2.0定义的parataxis关系是通用的，因此，有时很难将其与相互竞争的分析区分开来，例如协调(coordination)、联合(conj)或并列(appos)。并列的特定亚型在特征上也有很大的不同。在这项研究中，我们首先表明，使用并行UD (PUD-)树库作为数据，UD-注释器的实际实践是多种多样的。然后我们回顾当前的定义和指导方针，并提出改进建议。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Towards an adequate account of parataxis in Universal Dependencies

The parataxis relation as defined for Universal Dependencies 2.0 is general and, for this reason, sometimes hard to distinguish from competing analyses, such as coordination, conj, or apposition, appos. The specific subtypes that are listed for parataxis are also quite different in character. In this study we first show that the actual practice by UD-annotators is varied, using the parallel UD (PUD-) treebanks as data. We then review the current definitions and guidelines and suggest improvements.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Universal Dependencies (UDW, SyntaxFest 2019)

自引率

0.00%

发文量