{"title":"对Erickson-Gini《纳巴泰陶器年代测定的问题与解决方案》的回应","authors":"Sarah Wenner, S. Parker","doi":"10.31338/uw.2083-537x.pam30.2.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the late 1990s, Stephan G. Schmid published a chronological typology of Nabataean Painted Fineware (NPFW) that was widely accepted by scholars of Nabataea and Roman Arabia. Tali Erickson-Gini has since raised concerns about parts of his NPFW typology, specifically related to two decoration types dating to the end of the 1st century and the beginning of the 2nd century CE (Dekorphases 3b and 3c). This article is a response to Erickson-Gini’s critique, published in this volume. We find that there is sufficient evidence to broadly validate Schmid’s proposed dating for the beginning of production of Dekorphases 3b and 3c to the late 1st century and early 2nd century CE, respectively.","PeriodicalId":156819,"journal":{"name":"Polish Archaeology in the Mediterranean","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response to Erickson-Gini’s \\\"Problems and solutions in dating Nabataean pottery in the post-annexation period\\\"\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Wenner, S. Parker\",\"doi\":\"10.31338/uw.2083-537x.pam30.2.07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the late 1990s, Stephan G. Schmid published a chronological typology of Nabataean Painted Fineware (NPFW) that was widely accepted by scholars of Nabataea and Roman Arabia. Tali Erickson-Gini has since raised concerns about parts of his NPFW typology, specifically related to two decoration types dating to the end of the 1st century and the beginning of the 2nd century CE (Dekorphases 3b and 3c). This article is a response to Erickson-Gini’s critique, published in this volume. We find that there is sufficient evidence to broadly validate Schmid’s proposed dating for the beginning of production of Dekorphases 3b and 3c to the late 1st century and early 2nd century CE, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":156819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polish Archaeology in the Mediterranean\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polish Archaeology in the Mediterranean\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31338/uw.2083-537x.pam30.2.07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polish Archaeology in the Mediterranean","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31338/uw.2083-537x.pam30.2.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在20世纪90年代末,Stephan G. Schmid发表了纳巴泰彩绘精细器(NPFW)的年代类型学,该类型学被纳巴泰和罗马阿拉伯的学者广泛接受。此后,Tali Erickson-Gini对NPFW的部分类型学提出了担忧,特别是与可追溯到公元1世纪末和2世纪初的两种装饰类型(Dekorphases 3b和3c)有关。这篇文章是对Erickson-Gini在本卷中发表的批评的回应。我们发现有足够的证据可以广泛地证实Schmid提出的Dekorphases 3b和Dekorphases 3c开始生产的年代分别为公元1世纪末和2世纪初。
Response to Erickson-Gini’s "Problems and solutions in dating Nabataean pottery in the post-annexation period"
In the late 1990s, Stephan G. Schmid published a chronological typology of Nabataean Painted Fineware (NPFW) that was widely accepted by scholars of Nabataea and Roman Arabia. Tali Erickson-Gini has since raised concerns about parts of his NPFW typology, specifically related to two decoration types dating to the end of the 1st century and the beginning of the 2nd century CE (Dekorphases 3b and 3c). This article is a response to Erickson-Gini’s critique, published in this volume. We find that there is sufficient evidence to broadly validate Schmid’s proposed dating for the beginning of production of Dekorphases 3b and 3c to the late 1st century and early 2nd century CE, respectively.