外阴感觉不良(外阴痛)。一项后续研究。

B. Reed, H. Haefner, Lauren E. Cantor
{"title":"外阴感觉不良(外阴痛)。一项后续研究。","authors":"B. Reed, H. Haefner, Lauren E. Cantor","doi":"10.1097/01.OGX.0000090196.75538.9E","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo assess long-term outcome in women treated for vulvar dysesthesia (vulvodynia).\n\n\nSTUDY DESIGN\nCross-sectional survey via mailed questionnaires of women with vulvar dysesthesia treated at the University of Michigan. Questionnaires addressed symptom characteristics and their predictors, pregnancy response and treatments used. Analysis included t tests, nonparametric tests and multivariate analyses to assess associations between the degree of improvement (in the amount of pain experienced) since diagnosis and potential predictors of that outcome.\n\n\nRESULTS\nOf 234 questionnaires mailed, 104 were completed. Based on a 7-point pain scale (0-6, with 6 indicating excruciating pain), the level of pain at the time of the survey (1.6 +/- 1.3) was significantly lower than that at the time of diagnosis (4.5 +/- 1.5) (P < .0001). Of the 104 women, 56.8% reported > 50% improvement in their pain since diagnosis, and the pain had worsened in 1.9%. Greater improvement was noted with higher pain levels at baseline and with a shorter time since onset. The majority of women who had been pregnant since developing vulvar pain reported improvement (30%) or no change (40%) in symptoms during and after pregnancy. Treatments (nonrandom) rated as most effective included antidepressants (used for pain control) and anticonvulsant medications, biofeedback and counseling.\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nMost women with vulvar dysesthesia reported markedly less pain at follow-up, although few reported a \"cure.\" Pregnancy was not associated with worsening of vulvar symptoms for most women. Controlled clinical trials will be needed to elucidate treatments that are most effective.","PeriodicalId":192418,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of reproductive medicine","volume":"167 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vulvar dysesthesia (vulvodynia). A follow-up study.\",\"authors\":\"B. Reed, H. Haefner, Lauren E. Cantor\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.OGX.0000090196.75538.9E\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\nTo assess long-term outcome in women treated for vulvar dysesthesia (vulvodynia).\\n\\n\\nSTUDY DESIGN\\nCross-sectional survey via mailed questionnaires of women with vulvar dysesthesia treated at the University of Michigan. Questionnaires addressed symptom characteristics and their predictors, pregnancy response and treatments used. Analysis included t tests, nonparametric tests and multivariate analyses to assess associations between the degree of improvement (in the amount of pain experienced) since diagnosis and potential predictors of that outcome.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nOf 234 questionnaires mailed, 104 were completed. Based on a 7-point pain scale (0-6, with 6 indicating excruciating pain), the level of pain at the time of the survey (1.6 +/- 1.3) was significantly lower than that at the time of diagnosis (4.5 +/- 1.5) (P < .0001). Of the 104 women, 56.8% reported > 50% improvement in their pain since diagnosis, and the pain had worsened in 1.9%. Greater improvement was noted with higher pain levels at baseline and with a shorter time since onset. The majority of women who had been pregnant since developing vulvar pain reported improvement (30%) or no change (40%) in symptoms during and after pregnancy. Treatments (nonrandom) rated as most effective included antidepressants (used for pain control) and anticonvulsant medications, biofeedback and counseling.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nMost women with vulvar dysesthesia reported markedly less pain at follow-up, although few reported a \\\"cure.\\\" Pregnancy was not associated with worsening of vulvar symptoms for most women. Controlled clinical trials will be needed to elucidate treatments that are most effective.\",\"PeriodicalId\":192418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of reproductive medicine\",\"volume\":\"167 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of reproductive medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.OGX.0000090196.75538.9E\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.OGX.0000090196.75538.9E","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

摘要

目的评价女性外阴感觉不良(外阴痛)治疗的长期疗效。研究设计通过邮寄问卷对在密歇根大学接受外阴感觉不良治疗的女性进行横断面调查。问卷涉及症状特征及其预测因素、妊娠反应和使用的治疗方法。分析包括t检验、非参数检验和多变量分析,以评估自诊断以来改善程度(经历的疼痛量)与该结果的潜在预测因素之间的关联。结果共发放问卷234份,完成问卷104份。基于7分疼痛量表(0-6分,6分表示极度疼痛),调查时的疼痛水平(1.6 +/- 1.3)明显低于诊断时的疼痛水平(4.5 +/- 1.5)(P < 0.0001)。在104名女性中,56.8%的人报告自诊断以来疼痛改善了50%以上,1.9%的人疼痛恶化。基线疼痛水平越高,发作时间越短,改善越明显。大多数发生外阴疼痛后怀孕的妇女报告在怀孕期间和怀孕后症状改善(30%)或没有变化(40%)。被评为最有效的治疗方法(非随机)包括抗抑郁药(用于控制疼痛)和抗惊厥药物、生物反馈和咨询。结论:大多数外阴感觉不良的女性在随访中报告疼痛明显减轻,尽管很少报告“治愈”。对大多数妇女来说,怀孕与外阴症状的恶化无关。需要对照临床试验来阐明最有效的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vulvar dysesthesia (vulvodynia). A follow-up study.
OBJECTIVE To assess long-term outcome in women treated for vulvar dysesthesia (vulvodynia). STUDY DESIGN Cross-sectional survey via mailed questionnaires of women with vulvar dysesthesia treated at the University of Michigan. Questionnaires addressed symptom characteristics and their predictors, pregnancy response and treatments used. Analysis included t tests, nonparametric tests and multivariate analyses to assess associations between the degree of improvement (in the amount of pain experienced) since diagnosis and potential predictors of that outcome. RESULTS Of 234 questionnaires mailed, 104 were completed. Based on a 7-point pain scale (0-6, with 6 indicating excruciating pain), the level of pain at the time of the survey (1.6 +/- 1.3) was significantly lower than that at the time of diagnosis (4.5 +/- 1.5) (P < .0001). Of the 104 women, 56.8% reported > 50% improvement in their pain since diagnosis, and the pain had worsened in 1.9%. Greater improvement was noted with higher pain levels at baseline and with a shorter time since onset. The majority of women who had been pregnant since developing vulvar pain reported improvement (30%) or no change (40%) in symptoms during and after pregnancy. Treatments (nonrandom) rated as most effective included antidepressants (used for pain control) and anticonvulsant medications, biofeedback and counseling. CONCLUSION Most women with vulvar dysesthesia reported markedly less pain at follow-up, although few reported a "cure." Pregnancy was not associated with worsening of vulvar symptoms for most women. Controlled clinical trials will be needed to elucidate treatments that are most effective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信