论回归金本位的可行性

Bryan P. Cutsinger
{"title":"论回归金本位的可行性","authors":"Bryan P. Cutsinger","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3157678","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The gold standard is back in the news following a series of announcements from the Trump Administration indicating that the President was considering candidates for the open positions on the Federal Reserve Board who are sympathetic to the idea of restoring the gold standard. The prospect of returning to such a monetary system raises several important questions that would need to be addressed prior to its implementation. What would the appropriate parity be? How much gold would it require? Is the existing gold stock sufficient to support it? How much would it cost? This paper takes up these questions for the world's largest economies. I argue that the current market price of gold closely approximates the appropriate re-entry parity, and that at this price and at the currently required level of fiat reserves, the stock of above ground gold is large enough to support the adoption of gold redeemability, although it would require a one-time outlay of $3.5 trillion. I also find that the costs of maintaining the gold standard would be $383 billion per year. However, both of these cost estimates decline substantially when using historically-realistic reserve ratios. The principle conclusion of my analysis is that returning to the gold standard would be feasible in the technical sense considered in this paper. There is more than enough gold to support the resumption of redeemability, and the costs of doing so are relatively small. Other, more fundamental margins of feasibility should be considered, however.","PeriodicalId":376562,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Central Banks - Impacts (Topic)","volume":"85 5-6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Feasibility of Returning to the Gold Standard\",\"authors\":\"Bryan P. Cutsinger\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3157678\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The gold standard is back in the news following a series of announcements from the Trump Administration indicating that the President was considering candidates for the open positions on the Federal Reserve Board who are sympathetic to the idea of restoring the gold standard. The prospect of returning to such a monetary system raises several important questions that would need to be addressed prior to its implementation. What would the appropriate parity be? How much gold would it require? Is the existing gold stock sufficient to support it? How much would it cost? This paper takes up these questions for the world's largest economies. I argue that the current market price of gold closely approximates the appropriate re-entry parity, and that at this price and at the currently required level of fiat reserves, the stock of above ground gold is large enough to support the adoption of gold redeemability, although it would require a one-time outlay of $3.5 trillion. I also find that the costs of maintaining the gold standard would be $383 billion per year. However, both of these cost estimates decline substantially when using historically-realistic reserve ratios. The principle conclusion of my analysis is that returning to the gold standard would be feasible in the technical sense considered in this paper. There is more than enough gold to support the resumption of redeemability, and the costs of doing so are relatively small. Other, more fundamental margins of feasibility should be considered, however.\",\"PeriodicalId\":376562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Central Banks - Impacts (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"85 5-6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Central Banks - Impacts (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3157678\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Central Banks - Impacts (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3157678","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在特朗普政府发表了一系列声明,表明总统正在考虑支持恢复金本位的联邦储备委员会空缺职位的候选人之后,金本位制又回到了新闻中。回归这种货币体系的前景提出了几个重要问题,需要在实施之前加以解决。合适的宇称是什么?需要多少黄金?现有的黄金储备是否足以支撑它?要花多少钱?本文为世界上最大的几个经济体探讨了这些问题。我认为,目前的黄金市场价格非常接近于适当的重新进入平价,在这个价格和目前法定储备的要求水平下,地面上的黄金库存足够大,可以支持黄金的可赎回性,尽管这需要一次性支出3.5万亿美元。我还发现,维持金本位制的成本每年将达到3830亿美元。然而,当使用历史上真实的准备金比率时,这两种成本估计都大幅下降。我分析的主要结论是,在本文所考虑的技术意义上,回归金本位是可行的。有足够多的黄金支持恢复可赎回性,而且这样做的成本相对较小。但是,应该考虑其他更基本的可行性边际。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the Feasibility of Returning to the Gold Standard
Abstract The gold standard is back in the news following a series of announcements from the Trump Administration indicating that the President was considering candidates for the open positions on the Federal Reserve Board who are sympathetic to the idea of restoring the gold standard. The prospect of returning to such a monetary system raises several important questions that would need to be addressed prior to its implementation. What would the appropriate parity be? How much gold would it require? Is the existing gold stock sufficient to support it? How much would it cost? This paper takes up these questions for the world's largest economies. I argue that the current market price of gold closely approximates the appropriate re-entry parity, and that at this price and at the currently required level of fiat reserves, the stock of above ground gold is large enough to support the adoption of gold redeemability, although it would require a one-time outlay of $3.5 trillion. I also find that the costs of maintaining the gold standard would be $383 billion per year. However, both of these cost estimates decline substantially when using historically-realistic reserve ratios. The principle conclusion of my analysis is that returning to the gold standard would be feasible in the technical sense considered in this paper. There is more than enough gold to support the resumption of redeemability, and the costs of doing so are relatively small. Other, more fundamental margins of feasibility should be considered, however.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信