肥胖

Juliana Kain, B. Swinburn, R. Uauy
{"title":"肥胖","authors":"Juliana Kain, B. Swinburn, R. Uauy","doi":"10.1542/9781581108293-part06-ch25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives:Obesity burdens families, governments, and companies with a variety of direct costs for healthcare, and also indirect costs in lower productivity and well-being. To measure these costs in a middle-income country with rapidly rising obesity rates, we conducted a systematic review of the literature on the direct and indirect costs of obesity in Brazil. Methods: We searched for English and Portuguese language publications from 2004 to 2017 in EconLit, SciELO, NBER, PubMed, and Scopus. We included all studies that calculated the direct and indirect costs of obesity, except those that exclusively measured costs associated with bariatric surgery. No studies included were based on interventions. When studies calculated costs of obesity for a subset of the population, we extrapolated to the whole of Brazil, and all values were adjusted for inflation and expressed in 2017 prices. Results: The initial search identified 811 abstracts, of which eight publications met our criteria and were included. Seven of them have direct costs, while only one assessed indirect costs of obesity. Total costs of obesity in Brazil ranged from USD 133.8 million to USD 6.3 billion per year. This wide variance was driven by the difference in methods employed as well as diseases considered. Medication and out-of-pocket expenses were higher in households with obese individuals. The studies included were assessed according to the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort andCross-Sectional Studies of theNational Institute of Health, complying from 40% to 60% of the applicable criteria. All studies included only a fraction of known costs.Most included only data frompublic health care facilities, omitting expenditures at private clinics and pharmacies, and they used different comorbidities and criteria for measurement. Studies are also cross-sectional, and cannot determine causality. Conclusions: Evidence of the cost of obesity in Brazil is limited. The wide variance in methods used to calculate direct costs in the country restricts our ability to summarize the available evidence. However, all studies resulted in high costs of obesity. Studies that measure the indirect costs of obesity in Brazil are needed. Funding Sources: Bloomberg Philanthropies through a subaward agreement (5,104,695) between the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Fundação Faculdade de Medicina, Brazil.","PeriodicalId":172692,"journal":{"name":"Global Child Health Advocacy","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Obesity\",\"authors\":\"Juliana Kain, B. Swinburn, R. Uauy\",\"doi\":\"10.1542/9781581108293-part06-ch25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives:Obesity burdens families, governments, and companies with a variety of direct costs for healthcare, and also indirect costs in lower productivity and well-being. To measure these costs in a middle-income country with rapidly rising obesity rates, we conducted a systematic review of the literature on the direct and indirect costs of obesity in Brazil. Methods: We searched for English and Portuguese language publications from 2004 to 2017 in EconLit, SciELO, NBER, PubMed, and Scopus. We included all studies that calculated the direct and indirect costs of obesity, except those that exclusively measured costs associated with bariatric surgery. No studies included were based on interventions. When studies calculated costs of obesity for a subset of the population, we extrapolated to the whole of Brazil, and all values were adjusted for inflation and expressed in 2017 prices. Results: The initial search identified 811 abstracts, of which eight publications met our criteria and were included. Seven of them have direct costs, while only one assessed indirect costs of obesity. Total costs of obesity in Brazil ranged from USD 133.8 million to USD 6.3 billion per year. This wide variance was driven by the difference in methods employed as well as diseases considered. Medication and out-of-pocket expenses were higher in households with obese individuals. The studies included were assessed according to the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort andCross-Sectional Studies of theNational Institute of Health, complying from 40% to 60% of the applicable criteria. All studies included only a fraction of known costs.Most included only data frompublic health care facilities, omitting expenditures at private clinics and pharmacies, and they used different comorbidities and criteria for measurement. Studies are also cross-sectional, and cannot determine causality. Conclusions: Evidence of the cost of obesity in Brazil is limited. The wide variance in methods used to calculate direct costs in the country restricts our ability to summarize the available evidence. However, all studies resulted in high costs of obesity. Studies that measure the indirect costs of obesity in Brazil are needed. Funding Sources: Bloomberg Philanthropies through a subaward agreement (5,104,695) between the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Fundação Faculdade de Medicina, Brazil.\",\"PeriodicalId\":172692,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Child Health Advocacy\",\"volume\":\"107 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Child Health Advocacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1542/9781581108293-part06-ch25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Child Health Advocacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1542/9781581108293-part06-ch25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:肥胖给家庭、政府和公司带来了各种医疗保健的直接成本,以及生产力和福祉降低的间接成本。为了衡量一个肥胖率迅速上升的中等收入国家的这些成本,我们对巴西肥胖的直接和间接成本的文献进行了系统回顾。方法:在EconLit、SciELO、NBER、PubMed和Scopus中检索2004 - 2017年的英语和葡萄牙语出版物。我们纳入了所有计算肥胖直接和间接成本的研究,除了那些专门测量与减肥手术相关成本的研究。没有研究是基于干预的。当研究计算一部分人口的肥胖成本时,我们将其外推到整个巴西,所有数值都经过通胀调整,并以2017年的价格表示。结果:初步检索确定了811篇摘要,其中8篇出版物符合我们的标准并被纳入。其中7项有直接成本,而只有一项评估了肥胖的间接成本。巴西每年的肥胖总成本从1.338亿美元到63亿美元不等。这种巨大的差异是由所采用的方法和所考虑的疾病的差异造成的。在有肥胖个体的家庭中,药物和自付费用更高。纳入的研究根据美国国立卫生研究院观察性队列和横断面研究质量评估工具进行评估,符合适用标准的40%至60%。所有的研究只包括了已知成本的一小部分。大多数调查只包括来自公共医疗机构的数据,忽略了私人诊所和药店的支出,而且他们使用了不同的合并症和衡量标准。研究也是横断面的,不能确定因果关系。结论:关于巴西肥胖成本的证据有限。该国用于计算直接成本的方法差异很大,限制了我们总结现有证据的能力。然而,所有的研究都导致了肥胖的高成本。巴西需要研究肥胖症的间接成本。资金来源:布隆伯格慈善基金会通过北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校和巴西医学学院基金会之间的分奖协议(5,104,695)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Obesity
Objectives:Obesity burdens families, governments, and companies with a variety of direct costs for healthcare, and also indirect costs in lower productivity and well-being. To measure these costs in a middle-income country with rapidly rising obesity rates, we conducted a systematic review of the literature on the direct and indirect costs of obesity in Brazil. Methods: We searched for English and Portuguese language publications from 2004 to 2017 in EconLit, SciELO, NBER, PubMed, and Scopus. We included all studies that calculated the direct and indirect costs of obesity, except those that exclusively measured costs associated with bariatric surgery. No studies included were based on interventions. When studies calculated costs of obesity for a subset of the population, we extrapolated to the whole of Brazil, and all values were adjusted for inflation and expressed in 2017 prices. Results: The initial search identified 811 abstracts, of which eight publications met our criteria and were included. Seven of them have direct costs, while only one assessed indirect costs of obesity. Total costs of obesity in Brazil ranged from USD 133.8 million to USD 6.3 billion per year. This wide variance was driven by the difference in methods employed as well as diseases considered. Medication and out-of-pocket expenses were higher in households with obese individuals. The studies included were assessed according to the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort andCross-Sectional Studies of theNational Institute of Health, complying from 40% to 60% of the applicable criteria. All studies included only a fraction of known costs.Most included only data frompublic health care facilities, omitting expenditures at private clinics and pharmacies, and they used different comorbidities and criteria for measurement. Studies are also cross-sectional, and cannot determine causality. Conclusions: Evidence of the cost of obesity in Brazil is limited. The wide variance in methods used to calculate direct costs in the country restricts our ability to summarize the available evidence. However, all studies resulted in high costs of obesity. Studies that measure the indirect costs of obesity in Brazil are needed. Funding Sources: Bloomberg Philanthropies through a subaward agreement (5,104,695) between the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Fundação Faculdade de Medicina, Brazil.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信