应急管理的未来

J. Bullock, George D. Haddow
{"title":"应急管理的未来","authors":"J. Bullock, George D. Haddow","doi":"10.5055/JEM.2004.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Change has remained a constant in emergency management since 2000. In the aftermath of the Sep. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, the nation’s emergency management system experienced a drastic change in its all-hazards approach to risk to one that focused on the singular terrorism hazard. This particular change is believed to have been the principle cause of the botched response to Hurricane Katrina. Following that event, another change occurred as the focus returned to all-hazards. And again, as the dust rises in the effort to rebuild the Northeast states impacted by Hurricane Sandy, we are seeing new changes to the manner in which our government approaches recovery.","PeriodicalId":143363,"journal":{"name":"Introduction to Emergency Management","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Future of Emergency Management\",\"authors\":\"J. Bullock, George D. Haddow\",\"doi\":\"10.5055/JEM.2004.0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Change has remained a constant in emergency management since 2000. In the aftermath of the Sep. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, the nation’s emergency management system experienced a drastic change in its all-hazards approach to risk to one that focused on the singular terrorism hazard. This particular change is believed to have been the principle cause of the botched response to Hurricane Katrina. Following that event, another change occurred as the focus returned to all-hazards. And again, as the dust rises in the effort to rebuild the Northeast states impacted by Hurricane Sandy, we are seeing new changes to the manner in which our government approaches recovery.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143363,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Introduction to Emergency Management\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Introduction to Emergency Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5055/JEM.2004.0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Introduction to Emergency Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5055/JEM.2004.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

自2000年以来,应急管理不断发生变化。在2001年9月11日的恐怖袭击之后,美国的应急管理系统经历了一个巨大的变化,从对所有风险的处理方式转变为专注于单一的恐怖主义风险。这种特殊的变化被认为是对卡特里娜飓风反应拙劣的主要原因。在那次事件之后,另一个变化发生了,因为焦点回到了所有危险。随着受飓风“桑迪”影响的东北部各州重建工作的尘埃再次升起,我们看到政府处理重建工作的方式发生了新的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Future of Emergency Management
Change has remained a constant in emergency management since 2000. In the aftermath of the Sep. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, the nation’s emergency management system experienced a drastic change in its all-hazards approach to risk to one that focused on the singular terrorism hazard. This particular change is believed to have been the principle cause of the botched response to Hurricane Katrina. Following that event, another change occurred as the focus returned to all-hazards. And again, as the dust rises in the effort to rebuild the Northeast states impacted by Hurricane Sandy, we are seeing new changes to the manner in which our government approaches recovery.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信