脱欧后英国贸易和繁荣前景有多光明?

D. Blake
{"title":"脱欧后英国贸易和繁荣前景有多光明?","authors":"D. Blake","doi":"10.22381/JSME8120201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"So long as the UK government liberates itself from the protectionist mindset of the EU and reduces trade barriers after Brexit, and UK businesses respond positively to the challenge of increased international competition (through increased productivity), the prospects for UK trade and prosperity post-Brexit are very bright indeed. The EU itself acknowledges that 90% of future growth in global GDP will be outside the EU. The costs of remaining in the EU are very high and not all purely economic: the EU is no longer a force for global liberalisation. On the basis of both international and EU law, the monetary costs to the UK of leaving the EU should be fairly low. Similarly, the frictional costs to both the UK and the EU of their post-Brexit relationship should also be low. However, as a consequence of both the concessions made to date by the UK in order to demonstrate its goodwill and the hard line taken by the EU in order to discourage other member states from leaving, these costs could well end up being much higher than they need be for both sides. Of particular concern is the EU’s ‘level playing field’ demand, laid out in its negotiating Guidelines for a future trading relationship. This would effectively prevent the UK from achieving regulatory autonomy or from pursuing an independent trade policy.","PeriodicalId":426783,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Trade Policy (Topic)","volume":"57 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Bright are the Prospects for UK Trade and Prosperity Post-Brexit?\",\"authors\":\"D. Blake\",\"doi\":\"10.22381/JSME8120201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"So long as the UK government liberates itself from the protectionist mindset of the EU and reduces trade barriers after Brexit, and UK businesses respond positively to the challenge of increased international competition (through increased productivity), the prospects for UK trade and prosperity post-Brexit are very bright indeed. The EU itself acknowledges that 90% of future growth in global GDP will be outside the EU. The costs of remaining in the EU are very high and not all purely economic: the EU is no longer a force for global liberalisation. On the basis of both international and EU law, the monetary costs to the UK of leaving the EU should be fairly low. Similarly, the frictional costs to both the UK and the EU of their post-Brexit relationship should also be low. However, as a consequence of both the concessions made to date by the UK in order to demonstrate its goodwill and the hard line taken by the EU in order to discourage other member states from leaving, these costs could well end up being much higher than they need be for both sides. Of particular concern is the EU’s ‘level playing field’ demand, laid out in its negotiating Guidelines for a future trading relationship. This would effectively prevent the UK from achieving regulatory autonomy or from pursuing an independent trade policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Trade Policy (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"57 5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Trade Policy (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22381/JSME8120201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Trade Policy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22381/JSME8120201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

只要英国政府从欧盟的保护主义思维中解放出来,减少脱欧后的贸易壁垒,英国企业积极应对国际竞争加剧的挑战(通过提高生产率),脱欧后英国贸易和繁荣的前景确实非常光明。欧盟自己也承认,未来全球GDP增长的90%将来自欧盟以外。留在欧盟的成本非常高,而且不全是纯粹的经济成本:欧盟不再是推动全球自由化的力量。根据国际法和欧盟法,英国退出欧盟的货币成本应该相当低。同样,英国和欧盟脱欧后关系的摩擦成本也应该很低。然而,由于迄今为止英国为了展示自己的善意而做出的让步,以及欧盟为了阻止其他成员国退出而采取的强硬路线,这些成本很可能最终会远远高于双方所需的水平。特别值得关注的是欧盟在其未来贸易关系谈判指导方针中提出的“公平竞争环境”要求。这将有效地阻止英国实现监管自主权或追求独立的贸易政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Bright are the Prospects for UK Trade and Prosperity Post-Brexit?
So long as the UK government liberates itself from the protectionist mindset of the EU and reduces trade barriers after Brexit, and UK businesses respond positively to the challenge of increased international competition (through increased productivity), the prospects for UK trade and prosperity post-Brexit are very bright indeed. The EU itself acknowledges that 90% of future growth in global GDP will be outside the EU. The costs of remaining in the EU are very high and not all purely economic: the EU is no longer a force for global liberalisation. On the basis of both international and EU law, the monetary costs to the UK of leaving the EU should be fairly low. Similarly, the frictional costs to both the UK and the EU of their post-Brexit relationship should also be low. However, as a consequence of both the concessions made to date by the UK in order to demonstrate its goodwill and the hard line taken by the EU in order to discourage other member states from leaving, these costs could well end up being much higher than they need be for both sides. Of particular concern is the EU’s ‘level playing field’ demand, laid out in its negotiating Guidelines for a future trading relationship. This would effectively prevent the UK from achieving regulatory autonomy or from pursuing an independent trade policy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信