爱丁堡面具对口吃的影响

S. Block, R. Ingham, R. Bench
{"title":"爱丁堡面具对口吃的影响","authors":"S. Block, R. Ingham, R. Bench","doi":"10.3109/ASL2.1996.24.ISSUE-1.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Auditory feedback masking has long been thought to be a clinically useful procedure for the modification of stuttered speech in adults, and the Edinburgh Masker is a commercial device for providing such masking. In the present study, 18 subjects spoke under various masking and nonmasking conditions using the Edinburgh Masker, both in and beyond the clinic. Results showed that stuttering rate reduced by a mean of around 50% in masking compared to nonmasking conditions. Only one subject completely eliminated stuttering, and did so in only one of many speaking tasks. Listeners judged masked speech to be less natural sounding than nonmasked speech. It is concluded that, for some clients, there may be some benefit in masked speech by means of the Edinburgh Masker, but that the device does not appear to produce either stutter-free or natural sounding speech.","PeriodicalId":426731,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of human communication disorders","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effects of the Edinburgh Masker on Stuttering\",\"authors\":\"S. Block, R. Ingham, R. Bench\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/ASL2.1996.24.ISSUE-1.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Auditory feedback masking has long been thought to be a clinically useful procedure for the modification of stuttered speech in adults, and the Edinburgh Masker is a commercial device for providing such masking. In the present study, 18 subjects spoke under various masking and nonmasking conditions using the Edinburgh Masker, both in and beyond the clinic. Results showed that stuttering rate reduced by a mean of around 50% in masking compared to nonmasking conditions. Only one subject completely eliminated stuttering, and did so in only one of many speaking tasks. Listeners judged masked speech to be less natural sounding than nonmasked speech. It is concluded that, for some clients, there may be some benefit in masked speech by means of the Edinburgh Masker, but that the device does not appear to produce either stutter-free or natural sounding speech.\",\"PeriodicalId\":426731,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian journal of human communication disorders\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1996-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian journal of human communication disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/ASL2.1996.24.ISSUE-1.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of human communication disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/ASL2.1996.24.ISSUE-1.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

听觉反馈掩蔽长期以来被认为是一种临床上有用的治疗成人口吃的方法,爱丁堡掩蔽器是一种提供这种掩蔽的商业设备。在本研究中,18名受试者在不同的掩蔽和非掩蔽条件下使用爱丁堡掩蔽器在诊所内外说话。结果表明,与非掩蔽条件相比,掩蔽条件下的口吃率平均降低了约50%。只有一名受试者完全消除了口吃,而且只在众多口语任务中的一项中做到了这一点。听众认为蒙面讲话比不蒙面讲话听起来更不自然。结论是,对于一些客户来说,使用爱丁堡面具可能会有一些好处,但该设备似乎不能产生无口吃或自然发音的语音。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effects of the Edinburgh Masker on Stuttering
Auditory feedback masking has long been thought to be a clinically useful procedure for the modification of stuttered speech in adults, and the Edinburgh Masker is a commercial device for providing such masking. In the present study, 18 subjects spoke under various masking and nonmasking conditions using the Edinburgh Masker, both in and beyond the clinic. Results showed that stuttering rate reduced by a mean of around 50% in masking compared to nonmasking conditions. Only one subject completely eliminated stuttering, and did so in only one of many speaking tasks. Listeners judged masked speech to be less natural sounding than nonmasked speech. It is concluded that, for some clients, there may be some benefit in masked speech by means of the Edinburgh Masker, but that the device does not appear to produce either stutter-free or natural sounding speech.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信