奥瓦尔·e·福伯斯:从社会主义走向现实主义

R. Reed
{"title":"奥瓦尔·e·福伯斯:从社会主义走向现实主义","authors":"R. Reed","doi":"10.2307/40030925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ORVAL E. FAUBUS WAS REARED A LIBERAL. His father, Sam Faubus, was a Socialist who detested capitalism and bigotry with equal fervor. The son's critics, myself included, have accused him through the years of selling out the beliefs of his father on both race and economics. The story may be less straightforward than that. Orval Faubus came to power in Arkansas after World War II when two things were happening: First, the old populist revolt that had inflamed the hills for several generations was burning itself out.1 The end of Faubus's own radicalism coincided almost perfectly with the decline of radicalism among his people, not only in the Ozarks but right across the southern uplands. Prosperity, meager as it was, finally intruded into the hills and nudged out not only the Socialists like his father but also the intellectually tamer populists who had used their hill-country base to shower invective on the delta planters and their establishment cohorts in banking, business, and industry. Resentment slowly began to give way to the other side of the populist coin, hope. Hope and appetite and a vestigially populist belief still current: that our fellow hillbilly Sam Walton made it and, with a little luck, I can make it, too. Second, a national phenomenon with far-reaching consequences was coming to a head during the 1950s. The racial equilibrium of the South was being extraordinarily disturbed, not merely by local agitation but more importantly by external forces that eventually would sweep away the entire breastwork of white supremacist defenses. The liberal Faubus might have thrown in with the national mood, a growing impatience with southern heel-dragging. Realistically, however, how much can he be blamed for choosing to be seen as defender of the local faith, no matter how little he shared that faith? What would have been the fate of a governor who chose the other side? Some of my heroes have argued that he could have exerted leadership for the rights of blacks and survived. Or that, at the least, he could have died an honorable political death. Maybe so. But Orval Faubus had seen quite enough of honorable struggle for lost causes in his boyhood home. And there was something else. By the time he was grown, he had seen enough fear, loss, and death to last a lifetime. Literally from the beginning, Orval Eugene Faubus's life was threatened. He weighed two-and-one-half pounds when he was born the night of January 7, 1910, and was so frail that the midwife expected him to die before morning. One night when he was a year old, he caught the croup and stopped breathing. His father rushed him outside into the cold air and plunged a finger into his throat to save his life. The toddler was just learning to talk when he wandered from the house and fell into a deep spring of water and somehow did not drown but climbed out just as his mother got there. Danger continued to surround him as he grew and became part of the community. The year he was seven, one playmate died of diphtheria and another was crushed to death by a falling tree. During another year, flux swept the community and killed two children in a neighboring family. Life was not only perilous at Greasy Creek; it was also hard. Southern Madison County was like most of the Ozarks at that time. The residents scraped by. The towns had a small prosperity, but the countryside provided little more than subsistence. Rural people like the Faubuses raised almost all their food. Shoes and coats were practically luxuries because they had to be bought with cash, and cash was pitiably scarce. Even kerosene for the lamps was so dear that, after John D. Rockefeller cornered the market and raised the price, young Orval had to walk behind the wagon and carry the filled can the two miles from Combs to Greasy Creek, so as not to spill any-or so he recollected in 1964 when Rockefeller's grandson Winthrop tried to wrest the governorship of Arkansas from him. …","PeriodicalId":262484,"journal":{"name":"Readings in Arkansas Politics and Government, 2nd Edition","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Orval E. Faubus: OUt of Socialism into Realism\",\"authors\":\"R. Reed\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/40030925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ORVAL E. FAUBUS WAS REARED A LIBERAL. His father, Sam Faubus, was a Socialist who detested capitalism and bigotry with equal fervor. The son's critics, myself included, have accused him through the years of selling out the beliefs of his father on both race and economics. The story may be less straightforward than that. Orval Faubus came to power in Arkansas after World War II when two things were happening: First, the old populist revolt that had inflamed the hills for several generations was burning itself out.1 The end of Faubus's own radicalism coincided almost perfectly with the decline of radicalism among his people, not only in the Ozarks but right across the southern uplands. Prosperity, meager as it was, finally intruded into the hills and nudged out not only the Socialists like his father but also the intellectually tamer populists who had used their hill-country base to shower invective on the delta planters and their establishment cohorts in banking, business, and industry. Resentment slowly began to give way to the other side of the populist coin, hope. Hope and appetite and a vestigially populist belief still current: that our fellow hillbilly Sam Walton made it and, with a little luck, I can make it, too. Second, a national phenomenon with far-reaching consequences was coming to a head during the 1950s. The racial equilibrium of the South was being extraordinarily disturbed, not merely by local agitation but more importantly by external forces that eventually would sweep away the entire breastwork of white supremacist defenses. The liberal Faubus might have thrown in with the national mood, a growing impatience with southern heel-dragging. Realistically, however, how much can he be blamed for choosing to be seen as defender of the local faith, no matter how little he shared that faith? What would have been the fate of a governor who chose the other side? Some of my heroes have argued that he could have exerted leadership for the rights of blacks and survived. Or that, at the least, he could have died an honorable political death. Maybe so. But Orval Faubus had seen quite enough of honorable struggle for lost causes in his boyhood home. And there was something else. By the time he was grown, he had seen enough fear, loss, and death to last a lifetime. Literally from the beginning, Orval Eugene Faubus's life was threatened. He weighed two-and-one-half pounds when he was born the night of January 7, 1910, and was so frail that the midwife expected him to die before morning. One night when he was a year old, he caught the croup and stopped breathing. His father rushed him outside into the cold air and plunged a finger into his throat to save his life. The toddler was just learning to talk when he wandered from the house and fell into a deep spring of water and somehow did not drown but climbed out just as his mother got there. Danger continued to surround him as he grew and became part of the community. The year he was seven, one playmate died of diphtheria and another was crushed to death by a falling tree. During another year, flux swept the community and killed two children in a neighboring family. Life was not only perilous at Greasy Creek; it was also hard. Southern Madison County was like most of the Ozarks at that time. The residents scraped by. The towns had a small prosperity, but the countryside provided little more than subsistence. Rural people like the Faubuses raised almost all their food. Shoes and coats were practically luxuries because they had to be bought with cash, and cash was pitiably scarce. Even kerosene for the lamps was so dear that, after John D. Rockefeller cornered the market and raised the price, young Orval had to walk behind the wagon and carry the filled can the two miles from Combs to Greasy Creek, so as not to spill any-or so he recollected in 1964 when Rockefeller's grandson Winthrop tried to wrest the governorship of Arkansas from him. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":262484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Readings in Arkansas Politics and Government, 2nd Edition\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Readings in Arkansas Politics and Government, 2nd Edition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/40030925\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Readings in Arkansas Politics and Government, 2nd Edition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/40030925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

奥瓦尔·e·福伯斯从小就被培养成自由主义者。他的父亲山姆·福伯斯(Sam Faubus)是一名社会主义者,同样痛恨资本主义和偏执。包括我在内的批评者多年来一直指责他出卖了他父亲在种族和经济方面的信念。事实可能没有这么简单。奥瓦尔·福伯斯在第二次世界大战后在阿肯色州掌权,当时发生了两件事:首先,几代人以来一直在煽风点火的旧的民粹主义叛乱正在自燃福伯斯自己激进主义的终结与他的人民中激进主义的衰落几乎完全吻合,不仅在奥扎克,而且在整个南部高地。繁荣,尽管贫乏,最终侵入了山区,不仅赶走了像他父亲那样的社会主义者,也赶走了理智上比较温和的民粹主义者,后者利用他们在山区的基础,对三角洲地区的种植园主和他们在银行、商业和工业领域的建制派进行了猛烈的抨击。怨恨慢慢地开始让位于民粹主义硬币的另一面——希望。希望、欲望和残余的民粹主义信念依然存在:我们的乡巴佬山姆•沃尔顿(Sam Walton)成功了,再加上一点运气,我也能成功。其次,一种影响深远的全国性现象在20世纪50年代达到顶峰。南方的种族平衡受到了极大的破坏,这不仅是由于当地的骚动,更重要的是由于外部力量,这些外部力量最终将扫除白人至上主义者的整个防御网络。自由派的福伯斯可能会随大流,对南方拖后腿的做法越来越不耐烦。然而,现实地说,他选择被视为当地信仰的捍卫者,无论他与当地信仰的分享有多少,又能受到多大的指责呢?如果一个州长选择了另一边,他的命运会是怎样的呢?我的一些偶像认为,他本可以发挥领导作用,争取黑人的权利,并幸存下来。或者,至少,他可以光荣地在政治上死去。也许是这样。但是奥瓦尔·福伯斯在他童年的家里已经看够了为失败而进行的光荣斗争。还有一件事。当他长大成人的时候,他已经经历了足够多的恐惧、失去和死亡。从一开始,奥瓦尔·尤金·福伯斯的生命就受到了威胁。1910年1月7日晚上,他出生时重2.5磅,身体非常虚弱,助产士预计他在天亮之前就会死去。当他一岁的时候,一天晚上,他抓住了一群人,停止了呼吸。他的父亲把他赶到外面寒冷的空气中,用一根手指插进他的喉咙里以救他的命。这个蹒跚学步的孩子刚学会说话,就从房子里走出来,掉进了一个深泉里,不知怎么的,他没有淹死,而是在他妈妈赶到时爬了出来。当他长大并成为社区的一员时,危险一直围绕着他。他七岁那年,一个玩伴死于白喉,另一个被倒下的树压死。又过了一年,flux席卷了整个社区,杀死了邻居家的两个孩子。在油腻溪的生活不仅危险;这也很难。南麦迪逊县当时就像欧扎克的大部分地区一样。居民们勉强度日。城镇略有繁荣,但农村只能维持生计。像福伯斯一家这样的农村人,几乎所有的食物都是自己种植的。鞋子和外套实际上是奢侈品,因为它们必须用现金购买,而现金少得可怜。就连用来照明的煤油也太贵了,以至于在约翰·d·洛克菲勒垄断市场并提高价格后,年轻的奥瓦尔不得不跟在马车后面,拎着装满煤油的罐子走两英里路,从库姆斯到多油溪,以免洒出任何东西。1964年,洛克菲勒的孙子温斯洛普试图从他手中夺取阿肯色州州长的职位,奥瓦尔回忆起了这一点。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Orval E. Faubus: OUt of Socialism into Realism
ORVAL E. FAUBUS WAS REARED A LIBERAL. His father, Sam Faubus, was a Socialist who detested capitalism and bigotry with equal fervor. The son's critics, myself included, have accused him through the years of selling out the beliefs of his father on both race and economics. The story may be less straightforward than that. Orval Faubus came to power in Arkansas after World War II when two things were happening: First, the old populist revolt that had inflamed the hills for several generations was burning itself out.1 The end of Faubus's own radicalism coincided almost perfectly with the decline of radicalism among his people, not only in the Ozarks but right across the southern uplands. Prosperity, meager as it was, finally intruded into the hills and nudged out not only the Socialists like his father but also the intellectually tamer populists who had used their hill-country base to shower invective on the delta planters and their establishment cohorts in banking, business, and industry. Resentment slowly began to give way to the other side of the populist coin, hope. Hope and appetite and a vestigially populist belief still current: that our fellow hillbilly Sam Walton made it and, with a little luck, I can make it, too. Second, a national phenomenon with far-reaching consequences was coming to a head during the 1950s. The racial equilibrium of the South was being extraordinarily disturbed, not merely by local agitation but more importantly by external forces that eventually would sweep away the entire breastwork of white supremacist defenses. The liberal Faubus might have thrown in with the national mood, a growing impatience with southern heel-dragging. Realistically, however, how much can he be blamed for choosing to be seen as defender of the local faith, no matter how little he shared that faith? What would have been the fate of a governor who chose the other side? Some of my heroes have argued that he could have exerted leadership for the rights of blacks and survived. Or that, at the least, he could have died an honorable political death. Maybe so. But Orval Faubus had seen quite enough of honorable struggle for lost causes in his boyhood home. And there was something else. By the time he was grown, he had seen enough fear, loss, and death to last a lifetime. Literally from the beginning, Orval Eugene Faubus's life was threatened. He weighed two-and-one-half pounds when he was born the night of January 7, 1910, and was so frail that the midwife expected him to die before morning. One night when he was a year old, he caught the croup and stopped breathing. His father rushed him outside into the cold air and plunged a finger into his throat to save his life. The toddler was just learning to talk when he wandered from the house and fell into a deep spring of water and somehow did not drown but climbed out just as his mother got there. Danger continued to surround him as he grew and became part of the community. The year he was seven, one playmate died of diphtheria and another was crushed to death by a falling tree. During another year, flux swept the community and killed two children in a neighboring family. Life was not only perilous at Greasy Creek; it was also hard. Southern Madison County was like most of the Ozarks at that time. The residents scraped by. The towns had a small prosperity, but the countryside provided little more than subsistence. Rural people like the Faubuses raised almost all their food. Shoes and coats were practically luxuries because they had to be bought with cash, and cash was pitiably scarce. Even kerosene for the lamps was so dear that, after John D. Rockefeller cornered the market and raised the price, young Orval had to walk behind the wagon and carry the filled can the two miles from Combs to Greasy Creek, so as not to spill any-or so he recollected in 1964 when Rockefeller's grandson Winthrop tried to wrest the governorship of Arkansas from him. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信