{"title":"传统银行和伊斯兰银行在证券交易所利达的财务业绩比较分析(Panin islamic Bank案例研究)","authors":"N. Yanti, Yanti Rozalina","doi":"10.37034/jems.v5i1.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research is to know: 1) comparison of financial performance between conventional Bank (BRI) and Bank Syari'ah (Bank Panin Syari'ah) listed in BEI period 2011-2015 seen from financial liquidity ratio (Quick Ratio, LDR), ratio solvability (CAR), and Rentability ratio (ROA, BOPO and NPM). 2) Differences in the financial performance of conventional banks (BRI) and Bank Syari'ah (Panin Bank Syari'ah). The population in this research is Bank Rakyat Indonesia and Bank Panin Syari'ah. The sample is the financial statements of the two banks from 2011-2015. The analysis method used is the analysis of liquidity ratio, solvability and Rentabilitas. Hypothesis test using two different test average (independent sample t- test). The results show that quick ratio, LDR, CAR, ROA, BOPO, and NPM Bank BRI is good, because it has been able to reach predefined standards. For Bank Panin Syari'ah only the ratio of CAR, ROA, BOPO and NPM are said to be good, because it has been able to achieve the standards that have been determined despite decreases and increases. As for the ratio of LDR and Quick ratio in Bank Panin Syariah has not been good because during the period 2011-2015 has not been able to reach the standard set by BI at 81% -110% and 15% -20%. Quick Ratio, CAR, ROA and Net Profit Margin of Bank BRI and Bank Panin Syaria'ah there are significant differences. Meanwhile, if seen from the ratio of LDR, and BOPO there is no significant difference between the financial performance of Bank Rakyat Indonesia and Bank Panin Syariah due to significant value greater than alpha 0.05","PeriodicalId":347137,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economics and Management Scienties","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Keuangan antara Perbankan Konvensional dan Perbankan Syariah yang Listed di Bursa Efek Indonesia (Studi Kasus Bank BRI dan Bank Panin Syariah)\",\"authors\":\"N. Yanti, Yanti Rozalina\",\"doi\":\"10.37034/jems.v5i1.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this research is to know: 1) comparison of financial performance between conventional Bank (BRI) and Bank Syari'ah (Bank Panin Syari'ah) listed in BEI period 2011-2015 seen from financial liquidity ratio (Quick Ratio, LDR), ratio solvability (CAR), and Rentability ratio (ROA, BOPO and NPM). 2) Differences in the financial performance of conventional banks (BRI) and Bank Syari'ah (Panin Bank Syari'ah). The population in this research is Bank Rakyat Indonesia and Bank Panin Syari'ah. The sample is the financial statements of the two banks from 2011-2015. The analysis method used is the analysis of liquidity ratio, solvability and Rentabilitas. Hypothesis test using two different test average (independent sample t- test). The results show that quick ratio, LDR, CAR, ROA, BOPO, and NPM Bank BRI is good, because it has been able to reach predefined standards. For Bank Panin Syari'ah only the ratio of CAR, ROA, BOPO and NPM are said to be good, because it has been able to achieve the standards that have been determined despite decreases and increases. As for the ratio of LDR and Quick ratio in Bank Panin Syariah has not been good because during the period 2011-2015 has not been able to reach the standard set by BI at 81% -110% and 15% -20%. Quick Ratio, CAR, ROA and Net Profit Margin of Bank BRI and Bank Panin Syaria'ah there are significant differences. Meanwhile, if seen from the ratio of LDR, and BOPO there is no significant difference between the financial performance of Bank Rakyat Indonesia and Bank Panin Syariah due to significant value greater than alpha 0.05\",\"PeriodicalId\":347137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economics and Management Scienties\",\"volume\":\"106 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economics and Management Scienties\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37034/jems.v5i1.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economics and Management Scienties","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37034/jems.v5i1.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究的目的是了解:1)从财务流动性比率(Quick ratio, LDR)、比率可偿债能力(CAR)和可租赁性比率(ROA, BOPO和NPM)来看,2011-2015年BEI上市的传统银行(BRI)与叙利亚银行(Bank Panin Syari’ah)的财务绩效比较。2)传统银行(BRI)和伊斯兰银行(Panin Bank Syari’ah)财务绩效的差异。本研究的对象是印尼人民银行(Bank Rakyat Indonesia)和Panin Syari'ah银行。样本是两家银行2011-2015年的财务报表。使用的分析方法是流动性比率、可解性和可持续性分析。假设检验采用两个不同的检验平均值(独立样本t检验)。结果表明,速动比率、LDR、CAR、ROA、BOPO和NPM银行BRI都很好,因为它已经能够达到预定义的标准。对于Panin Syari'ah银行来说,只有CAR、ROA、BOPO和NPM的比率被认为是好的,因为它能够达到已经确定的标准,尽管有下降和增加。至于伊斯兰银行的LDR比率和速动比率并不好,因为2011-2015年期间未能达到BI设定的81% -110%和15% -20%的标准。BRI银行和Panin银行的速动比率、CAR、ROA和净利润率存在显著差异。同时,从LDR和BOPO的比率来看,Bank Rakyat Indonesia和Bank Panin Syariah的财务绩效没有显著差异,因为显著值大于alpha 0.05
Analisis Perbandingan Kinerja Keuangan antara Perbankan Konvensional dan Perbankan Syariah yang Listed di Bursa Efek Indonesia (Studi Kasus Bank BRI dan Bank Panin Syariah)
The purpose of this research is to know: 1) comparison of financial performance between conventional Bank (BRI) and Bank Syari'ah (Bank Panin Syari'ah) listed in BEI period 2011-2015 seen from financial liquidity ratio (Quick Ratio, LDR), ratio solvability (CAR), and Rentability ratio (ROA, BOPO and NPM). 2) Differences in the financial performance of conventional banks (BRI) and Bank Syari'ah (Panin Bank Syari'ah). The population in this research is Bank Rakyat Indonesia and Bank Panin Syari'ah. The sample is the financial statements of the two banks from 2011-2015. The analysis method used is the analysis of liquidity ratio, solvability and Rentabilitas. Hypothesis test using two different test average (independent sample t- test). The results show that quick ratio, LDR, CAR, ROA, BOPO, and NPM Bank BRI is good, because it has been able to reach predefined standards. For Bank Panin Syari'ah only the ratio of CAR, ROA, BOPO and NPM are said to be good, because it has been able to achieve the standards that have been determined despite decreases and increases. As for the ratio of LDR and Quick ratio in Bank Panin Syariah has not been good because during the period 2011-2015 has not been able to reach the standard set by BI at 81% -110% and 15% -20%. Quick Ratio, CAR, ROA and Net Profit Margin of Bank BRI and Bank Panin Syaria'ah there are significant differences. Meanwhile, if seen from the ratio of LDR, and BOPO there is no significant difference between the financial performance of Bank Rakyat Indonesia and Bank Panin Syariah due to significant value greater than alpha 0.05