基于Rabin公钥密码系统的id签名方案攻击

M.-K. Ko, T. Hwang, C. -. Chang
{"title":"基于Rabin公钥密码系统的id签名方案攻击","authors":"M.-K. Ko, T. Hwang, C. -. Chang","doi":"10.1109/CCST.1993.386831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two attacks are given to show that the identity-based signature scheme proposed by C. C. Chang and C. H. Lin (1991) based upon Rabin's public key cryptosystem is not secure enough. One of the attacks is based on the conspiracy of two users in the system while the other can be performed by anyone alone. It is shown that, in this second attack, the scheme can be broken by anyone (not necessarily a user in the system) who has the ability to observe the communications between the signer and the receiver.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":404786,"journal":{"name":"1993 Proceedings of IEEE International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology","volume":"236 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Attacks on ID-based signature scheme based upon Rabin's public key cryptosystem\",\"authors\":\"M.-K. Ko, T. Hwang, C. -. Chang\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CCST.1993.386831\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two attacks are given to show that the identity-based signature scheme proposed by C. C. Chang and C. H. Lin (1991) based upon Rabin's public key cryptosystem is not secure enough. One of the attacks is based on the conspiracy of two users in the system while the other can be performed by anyone alone. It is shown that, in this second attack, the scheme can be broken by anyone (not necessarily a user in the system) who has the ability to observe the communications between the signer and the receiver.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":404786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"1993 Proceedings of IEEE International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology\",\"volume\":\"236 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1993-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"1993 Proceedings of IEEE International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCST.1993.386831\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1993 Proceedings of IEEE International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CCST.1993.386831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

通过两个攻击证明了C. C. Chang和C. H. Lin(1991)基于Rabin的公钥密码系统提出的基于身份的签名方案不够安全。其中一种攻击是基于系统中两个用户的阴谋,而另一种攻击可以由任何人单独执行。结果表明,在第二次攻击中,任何人(不一定是系统中的用户)只要有能力观察签名者和接收者之间的通信,就可以破坏该方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Attacks on ID-based signature scheme based upon Rabin's public key cryptosystem
Two attacks are given to show that the identity-based signature scheme proposed by C. C. Chang and C. H. Lin (1991) based upon Rabin's public key cryptosystem is not secure enough. One of the attacks is based on the conspiracy of two users in the system while the other can be performed by anyone alone. It is shown that, in this second attack, the scheme can be broken by anyone (not necessarily a user in the system) who has the ability to observe the communications between the signer and the receiver.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信