可再生能源技术的选择及其对发展中国家的成本影响:以南非为例

S. Pillay, J. Pretorius, D. de Canha
{"title":"可再生能源技术的选择及其对发展中国家的成本影响:以南非为例","authors":"S. Pillay, J. Pretorius, D. de Canha","doi":"10.1109/AUPEC.2017.8282455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Now more than ever, renewable energy technologies have become a key player in improving accessibility to energy on the African continent. Focusing on the developing nation of South Africa, published works have indicated approximately thirteen criteria for selecting renewable energy technologies. Consideration was given to developed criteria and how they were used from technical, economic, social, environmental and political stances. The aid of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and an established decision-model the author endeavored to substantiate a method of selecting appropriate technologies. These technologies were ranked in order of priority using South African energy projects. Case study information for onshore wind, solar photo-voltaic, concentrated solar thermal, biomass and small hydro energy alternatives were used to apply the decision-model for their ranking and prioritizing. The overall outcome of the decision-model identified that solar energy is the most suitable for South Africa and should be developed for long-term policy and energy roadmaps.","PeriodicalId":155608,"journal":{"name":"2017 Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conference (AUPEC)","volume":"131 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The selection of renewable energy technologies and their cost implications for a developing country: The case of South Africa\",\"authors\":\"S. Pillay, J. Pretorius, D. de Canha\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AUPEC.2017.8282455\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Now more than ever, renewable energy technologies have become a key player in improving accessibility to energy on the African continent. Focusing on the developing nation of South Africa, published works have indicated approximately thirteen criteria for selecting renewable energy technologies. Consideration was given to developed criteria and how they were used from technical, economic, social, environmental and political stances. The aid of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and an established decision-model the author endeavored to substantiate a method of selecting appropriate technologies. These technologies were ranked in order of priority using South African energy projects. Case study information for onshore wind, solar photo-voltaic, concentrated solar thermal, biomass and small hydro energy alternatives were used to apply the decision-model for their ranking and prioritizing. The overall outcome of the decision-model identified that solar energy is the most suitable for South Africa and should be developed for long-term policy and energy roadmaps.\",\"PeriodicalId\":155608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conference (AUPEC)\",\"volume\":\"131 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conference (AUPEC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AUPEC.2017.8282455\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 Australasian Universities Power Engineering Conference (AUPEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AUPEC.2017.8282455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

现在,可再生能源技术比以往任何时候都更成为改善非洲大陆能源可及性的关键因素。已出版的著作以发展中国家南非为重点,指出了选择可再生能源技术的大约13个标准。审议了制定的标准以及如何从技术、经济、社会、环境和政治立场使用这些标准。本文试图借助层次分析法(AHP)和已建立的决策模型,提出一种合理选择技术的方法。这些技术是按照南非能源项目的优先顺序排列的。利用陆上风能、太阳能光伏、聚光光热、生物质能和小型水力替代能源的案例研究信息,应用决策模型对其进行排序和优先排序。决策模型的总体结果确定太阳能是最适合南非的,应该在长期政策和能源路线图中加以发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The selection of renewable energy technologies and their cost implications for a developing country: The case of South Africa
Now more than ever, renewable energy technologies have become a key player in improving accessibility to energy on the African continent. Focusing on the developing nation of South Africa, published works have indicated approximately thirteen criteria for selecting renewable energy technologies. Consideration was given to developed criteria and how they were used from technical, economic, social, environmental and political stances. The aid of analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and an established decision-model the author endeavored to substantiate a method of selecting appropriate technologies. These technologies were ranked in order of priority using South African energy projects. Case study information for onshore wind, solar photo-voltaic, concentrated solar thermal, biomass and small hydro energy alternatives were used to apply the decision-model for their ranking and prioritizing. The overall outcome of the decision-model identified that solar energy is the most suitable for South Africa and should be developed for long-term policy and energy roadmaps.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信