股权认同、股权集中度与企业经营效率的关系:来自中国2005-2012年的证据

K. Reddy, Nawazish Mirza, Yin Yu
{"title":"股权认同、股权集中度与企业经营效率的关系:来自中国2005-2012年的证据","authors":"K. Reddy, Nawazish Mirza, Yin Yu","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2479274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"China restructured its state assets management system through the establishment of the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (SASAC) in 2003. In consequence, de facto ownership rights to local state-owned enterprises (lo-cal SOEs) were granted to local governments. Chinese policymakers assumed that the split of state ownership between central government and local authorities would in-crease government’s fiscal incentives for improving SOEs’ economic efficiency. This study investigates whether the redefined state-owned firms have improved their performance and whether this performance is better than that of local government SOEs and privately owned firms. We have traced the identity of the largest shareholder among publicly listed firms and have classified it as the central government (SOECG), local government (SOELG), or privately owned (PRIVATE). Using panel data com-prising 13,273 firm-year observations for the period 2005-2012 and OLS, 2SLS, difference, and difference-in-difference regression, we report that the identity of the largest shareholder does matter. Our results show that the listed, central government owned SOEs’ operating costs are similar to those of local government owned SOEs and privately owned firms. The fact that the performance of central government owned SOEs is inferior to that of local government owned SOEs and privately owned firms suggests that helping-hand and protectionist policies have been an important contributing factor to SOECGs’ performance. This result is also supported by empirical analysis which suggests that central government shareholding is an important determinant for SOECGs’ performance. The policy implication of this study is that helping-hand and protectionist policies have been a barrier to fully realizing the benefits of ownership reform of listed companies in the absence of a competitive market and an effective legal infrastructure in China.","PeriodicalId":171289,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Law: Corporate Governance Law eJournal","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Relationship between Ownership Identity, Ownership Concentration, and Firm Operating Efficiency: Evidence from China 2005-2012\",\"authors\":\"K. Reddy, Nawazish Mirza, Yin Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2479274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"China restructured its state assets management system through the establishment of the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (SASAC) in 2003. In consequence, de facto ownership rights to local state-owned enterprises (lo-cal SOEs) were granted to local governments. Chinese policymakers assumed that the split of state ownership between central government and local authorities would in-crease government’s fiscal incentives for improving SOEs’ economic efficiency. This study investigates whether the redefined state-owned firms have improved their performance and whether this performance is better than that of local government SOEs and privately owned firms. We have traced the identity of the largest shareholder among publicly listed firms and have classified it as the central government (SOECG), local government (SOELG), or privately owned (PRIVATE). Using panel data com-prising 13,273 firm-year observations for the period 2005-2012 and OLS, 2SLS, difference, and difference-in-difference regression, we report that the identity of the largest shareholder does matter. Our results show that the listed, central government owned SOEs’ operating costs are similar to those of local government owned SOEs and privately owned firms. The fact that the performance of central government owned SOEs is inferior to that of local government owned SOEs and privately owned firms suggests that helping-hand and protectionist policies have been an important contributing factor to SOECGs’ performance. This result is also supported by empirical analysis which suggests that central government shareholding is an important determinant for SOECGs’ performance. The policy implication of this study is that helping-hand and protectionist policies have been a barrier to fully realizing the benefits of ownership reform of listed companies in the absence of a competitive market and an effective legal infrastructure in China.\",\"PeriodicalId\":171289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Law: Corporate Governance Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Law: Corporate Governance Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2479274\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Law: Corporate Governance Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2479274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

2003年,中国成立了国有资产监督管理委员会(SASAC),对国有资产管理体制进行了重组。因此,地方国有企业(地方国有企业)的实际所有权被授予了地方政府。中国的政策制定者认为,中央政府和地方政府之间的国有所有权分割将增加政府提高国有企业经济效率的财政激励。本研究考察了重新定义的国有企业是否提高了绩效,以及这种绩效是否优于地方政府国有企业和民营企业。我们追踪了上市公司中最大股东的身份,并将其分类为中央政府(SOECG),地方政府(SOELG)或私人拥有(PRIVATE)。利用2005-2012年期间13273个公司年度观察数据和OLS、2SLS、差异和差中差回归组成的面板数据,我们报告说,最大股东的身份确实很重要。我们的研究结果表明,上市央企的运营成本与地方国企和民营企业的运营成本相似。中央国有企业的绩效不如地方国有企业和民营企业,这一事实表明,援助之手和保护主义政策是国有企业绩效的重要因素。这一结果也得到了实证分析的支持,表明中央政府持股是国有企业绩效的重要决定因素。本研究的政策含义是,在中国缺乏竞争性市场和有效的法律基础设施的情况下,援助政策和保护主义政策一直是上市公司股权改革充分实现效益的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Relationship between Ownership Identity, Ownership Concentration, and Firm Operating Efficiency: Evidence from China 2005-2012
China restructured its state assets management system through the establishment of the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (SASAC) in 2003. In consequence, de facto ownership rights to local state-owned enterprises (lo-cal SOEs) were granted to local governments. Chinese policymakers assumed that the split of state ownership between central government and local authorities would in-crease government’s fiscal incentives for improving SOEs’ economic efficiency. This study investigates whether the redefined state-owned firms have improved their performance and whether this performance is better than that of local government SOEs and privately owned firms. We have traced the identity of the largest shareholder among publicly listed firms and have classified it as the central government (SOECG), local government (SOELG), or privately owned (PRIVATE). Using panel data com-prising 13,273 firm-year observations for the period 2005-2012 and OLS, 2SLS, difference, and difference-in-difference regression, we report that the identity of the largest shareholder does matter. Our results show that the listed, central government owned SOEs’ operating costs are similar to those of local government owned SOEs and privately owned firms. The fact that the performance of central government owned SOEs is inferior to that of local government owned SOEs and privately owned firms suggests that helping-hand and protectionist policies have been an important contributing factor to SOECGs’ performance. This result is also supported by empirical analysis which suggests that central government shareholding is an important determinant for SOECGs’ performance. The policy implication of this study is that helping-hand and protectionist policies have been a barrier to fully realizing the benefits of ownership reform of listed companies in the absence of a competitive market and an effective legal infrastructure in China.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信