乌尔米亚医科大学附属医院病案科工作效率分析

A. Mokhtari, B. Nabilou, S. Aghlmand, H. Yusefzadeh
{"title":"乌尔米亚医科大学附属医院病案科工作效率分析","authors":"A. Mokhtari, B. Nabilou, S. Aghlmand, H. Yusefzadeh","doi":"10.18502/jebhpme.v6i2.9941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The importance of paying attention to improving productivity in different health system departments  has become increasingly evident. This is due to increased costs of health care goods and services, limited resources and production facilities. This study aims to measure the productivity of hospitals' Medical Records Departments (MRD) affiliated with Urmia University of Medical Sciences to provide a comprehensive analysis of their performance. \nMethods: In this study, total productivity and total factor productivity changes of medical record departments in hospitals affiliated with Urmia University of Medical Sciences were calculated. This was conducted through Kendrick-Creamer and Malmquist indexes in 2016-2020, and has examined the trend of each one of them. Input variables included the number of personnel and equipment. Output variables encompassed the number of outpatient and inpatient medical records prepared for patients, responses to letters, and patients referred to the studied MRD. After estimating the production function, the elasticity of production factors and the return to the scale of medical record departments were calculated.Total productivity changes and production function were estimated via Deap2,1 and Frontier4,1 softwares by applying input minimization and variable returns to scale assumptions. \nResults: The results of the Malmquist index indicated that the average total productivity changes of medical records departments of hospitals during the study period were equal to 1,096. This is greater than one; therefore, it can be concluded that productivity has decreased by about 9.600 % during the study period. Changes in technological efficiency have had the greatest impact on reducing productivity, to other factors. In addition, the results of Kendrick-Creamer index during the years under review demonstrated that the average total productivity of production factors obtained, was equal to 18725.530 services. \nConclusion: There is decreased productivity due to technological changes in the studied departments. This is because of the lack of sufficient knowledge of the medical records department staff in the use of technology and equipment for providing efficient services . Holding training courses for the appropriate use of technology by personnel can be useful in this regard.","PeriodicalId":198049,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Health Policy, Management and Economics","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Productivity Analysis of Medical Record Department in Hospitals Affiliated with Urmia University of Medical Sciences\",\"authors\":\"A. Mokhtari, B. Nabilou, S. Aghlmand, H. Yusefzadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.18502/jebhpme.v6i2.9941\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The importance of paying attention to improving productivity in different health system departments  has become increasingly evident. This is due to increased costs of health care goods and services, limited resources and production facilities. This study aims to measure the productivity of hospitals' Medical Records Departments (MRD) affiliated with Urmia University of Medical Sciences to provide a comprehensive analysis of their performance. \\nMethods: In this study, total productivity and total factor productivity changes of medical record departments in hospitals affiliated with Urmia University of Medical Sciences were calculated. This was conducted through Kendrick-Creamer and Malmquist indexes in 2016-2020, and has examined the trend of each one of them. Input variables included the number of personnel and equipment. Output variables encompassed the number of outpatient and inpatient medical records prepared for patients, responses to letters, and patients referred to the studied MRD. After estimating the production function, the elasticity of production factors and the return to the scale of medical record departments were calculated.Total productivity changes and production function were estimated via Deap2,1 and Frontier4,1 softwares by applying input minimization and variable returns to scale assumptions. \\nResults: The results of the Malmquist index indicated that the average total productivity changes of medical records departments of hospitals during the study period were equal to 1,096. This is greater than one; therefore, it can be concluded that productivity has decreased by about 9.600 % during the study period. Changes in technological efficiency have had the greatest impact on reducing productivity, to other factors. In addition, the results of Kendrick-Creamer index during the years under review demonstrated that the average total productivity of production factors obtained, was equal to 18725.530 services. \\nConclusion: There is decreased productivity due to technological changes in the studied departments. This is because of the lack of sufficient knowledge of the medical records department staff in the use of technology and equipment for providing efficient services . Holding training courses for the appropriate use of technology by personnel can be useful in this regard.\",\"PeriodicalId\":198049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence Based Health Policy, Management and Economics\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence Based Health Policy, Management and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18502/jebhpme.v6i2.9941\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Health Policy, Management and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/jebhpme.v6i2.9941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在不同的卫生系统部门,关注提高生产力的重要性已经变得越来越明显。这是由于保健用品和服务的费用增加,资源和生产设施有限。本研究旨在测量乌尔米亚医科大学附属医院病案科(MRD)的生产力,以提供全面的绩效分析。方法:对乌尔米亚医科大学附属医院病案科的总生产率和全要素生产率变化进行统计。这是通过Kendrick-Creamer和Malmquist指数在2016-2020年进行的,并检查了每个指数的趋势。输入变量包括人员和设备的数量。输出变量包括为患者准备的门诊和住院医疗记录的数量、对信件的回复以及转介到研究MRD的患者。估算生产函数后,计算生产要素弹性和病案科室规模回归。通过deap1,2和frontier4,1软件,通过将投入最小化和可变回报应用于规模假设,估计了总生产率变化和生产函数。结果:Malmquist指数结果表明,研究期间各医院病案科的平均总生产力变化为1096。这个大于1;因此,可以得出结论,在研究期间,生产力下降了约9.600%。除其他因素外,技术效率的变化对降低生产率的影响最大。此外,回顾期间Kendrick-Creamer指数的结果表明,所获得的生产要素的平均总生产率等于18725.530个服务。结论:所研究的科室由于技术变革导致生产效率下降。这是因为病案科工作人员在利用技术和设备提供高效服务方面缺乏足够的知识。在这方面,举办人员适当使用技术的培训班是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Productivity Analysis of Medical Record Department in Hospitals Affiliated with Urmia University of Medical Sciences
Background: The importance of paying attention to improving productivity in different health system departments  has become increasingly evident. This is due to increased costs of health care goods and services, limited resources and production facilities. This study aims to measure the productivity of hospitals' Medical Records Departments (MRD) affiliated with Urmia University of Medical Sciences to provide a comprehensive analysis of their performance. Methods: In this study, total productivity and total factor productivity changes of medical record departments in hospitals affiliated with Urmia University of Medical Sciences were calculated. This was conducted through Kendrick-Creamer and Malmquist indexes in 2016-2020, and has examined the trend of each one of them. Input variables included the number of personnel and equipment. Output variables encompassed the number of outpatient and inpatient medical records prepared for patients, responses to letters, and patients referred to the studied MRD. After estimating the production function, the elasticity of production factors and the return to the scale of medical record departments were calculated.Total productivity changes and production function were estimated via Deap2,1 and Frontier4,1 softwares by applying input minimization and variable returns to scale assumptions. Results: The results of the Malmquist index indicated that the average total productivity changes of medical records departments of hospitals during the study period were equal to 1,096. This is greater than one; therefore, it can be concluded that productivity has decreased by about 9.600 % during the study period. Changes in technological efficiency have had the greatest impact on reducing productivity, to other factors. In addition, the results of Kendrick-Creamer index during the years under review demonstrated that the average total productivity of production factors obtained, was equal to 18725.530 services. Conclusion: There is decreased productivity due to technological changes in the studied departments. This is because of the lack of sufficient knowledge of the medical records department staff in the use of technology and equipment for providing efficient services . Holding training courses for the appropriate use of technology by personnel can be useful in this regard.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信