无需隐藏:保护商品硬件的安全区域

Koen Koning, Xi Chen, H. Bos, Cristiano Giuffrida, E. Athanasopoulos
{"title":"无需隐藏:保护商品硬件的安全区域","authors":"Koen Koning, Xi Chen, H. Bos, Cristiano Giuffrida, E. Athanasopoulos","doi":"10.1145/3064176.3064217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As modern 64-bit x86 processors no longer support the segmentation capabilities of their 32-bit predecessors, most research projects assume that strong in-process memory isolation is no longer an affordable option. Instead of strong, deterministic isolation, new defense systems therefore rely on the probabilistic pseudo-isolation provided by randomization to \"hide\" sensitive (or safe) regions. However, recent attacks have shown that such protection is insufficient; attackers can leak these safe regions in a variety of ways. In this paper, we revisit isolation for x86-64 and argue that hardware features enabling efficient deterministic isolation do exist. We first present a comprehensive study on commodity hardware features that can be repurposed to isolate safe regions in the same address space (e.g., Intel MPX and MPK). We then introduce MemSentry, a framework to harden modern defense systems with commodity hardware features instead of information hiding. Our results show that some hardware features are more effective than others in hardening such defenses in each scenario and that features originally conceived for other purposes (e.g., Intel MPX for bounds checking) are surprisingly efficient at isolating safe regions compared to their software equivalent (i.e., SFI).","PeriodicalId":262089,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Twelfth European Conference on Computer Systems","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"127","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No Need to Hide: Protecting Safe Regions on Commodity Hardware\",\"authors\":\"Koen Koning, Xi Chen, H. Bos, Cristiano Giuffrida, E. Athanasopoulos\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3064176.3064217\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As modern 64-bit x86 processors no longer support the segmentation capabilities of their 32-bit predecessors, most research projects assume that strong in-process memory isolation is no longer an affordable option. Instead of strong, deterministic isolation, new defense systems therefore rely on the probabilistic pseudo-isolation provided by randomization to \\\"hide\\\" sensitive (or safe) regions. However, recent attacks have shown that such protection is insufficient; attackers can leak these safe regions in a variety of ways. In this paper, we revisit isolation for x86-64 and argue that hardware features enabling efficient deterministic isolation do exist. We first present a comprehensive study on commodity hardware features that can be repurposed to isolate safe regions in the same address space (e.g., Intel MPX and MPK). We then introduce MemSentry, a framework to harden modern defense systems with commodity hardware features instead of information hiding. Our results show that some hardware features are more effective than others in hardening such defenses in each scenario and that features originally conceived for other purposes (e.g., Intel MPX for bounds checking) are surprisingly efficient at isolating safe regions compared to their software equivalent (i.e., SFI).\",\"PeriodicalId\":262089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Twelfth European Conference on Computer Systems\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"127\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Twelfth European Conference on Computer Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3064176.3064217\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Twelfth European Conference on Computer Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3064176.3064217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 127

摘要

由于现代64位x86处理器不再支持其32位前辈的分段功能,大多数研究项目都认为强大的进程内内存隔离不再是一种负担得起的选择。因此,新的防御系统依靠随机化提供的概率伪隔离来“隐藏”敏感(或安全)区域,而不是强大的确定性隔离。然而,最近的攻击表明,这种保护是不够的;攻击者可以通过各种方式泄漏这些安全区域。在本文中,我们将重新讨论x86-64的隔离,并论证支持高效确定性隔离的硬件特性确实存在。我们首先对商品硬件特性进行了全面的研究,这些特性可以重新用于隔离同一地址空间中的安全区域(例如,英特尔MPX和MPK)。然后,我们介绍MemSentry,这是一个框架,通过商用硬件功能而不是信息隐藏来强化现代防御系统。我们的结果表明,在每种情况下,一些硬件功能在强化此类防御方面比其他功能更有效,并且最初为其他目的构想的功能(例如,用于边界检查的Intel MPX)在隔离安全区域方面比其等效软件(即SFI)更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
No Need to Hide: Protecting Safe Regions on Commodity Hardware
As modern 64-bit x86 processors no longer support the segmentation capabilities of their 32-bit predecessors, most research projects assume that strong in-process memory isolation is no longer an affordable option. Instead of strong, deterministic isolation, new defense systems therefore rely on the probabilistic pseudo-isolation provided by randomization to "hide" sensitive (or safe) regions. However, recent attacks have shown that such protection is insufficient; attackers can leak these safe regions in a variety of ways. In this paper, we revisit isolation for x86-64 and argue that hardware features enabling efficient deterministic isolation do exist. We first present a comprehensive study on commodity hardware features that can be repurposed to isolate safe regions in the same address space (e.g., Intel MPX and MPK). We then introduce MemSentry, a framework to harden modern defense systems with commodity hardware features instead of information hiding. Our results show that some hardware features are more effective than others in hardening such defenses in each scenario and that features originally conceived for other purposes (e.g., Intel MPX for bounds checking) are surprisingly efficient at isolating safe regions compared to their software equivalent (i.e., SFI).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信