中国并购法中的强制出价规则评价:实证与比较分析

Joseph Lee, Yonghui Bao, Jinlin Li
{"title":"中国并购法中的强制出价规则评价:实证与比较分析","authors":"Joseph Lee, Yonghui Bao, Jinlin Li","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3676286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses the purpose and practice of the mandatory bid rule in takeovers in the UK. A literature review looks at the impact of the mandatory bid rule in a takeover on both bidders and target companies. The origin and evolution of the mandatory bid rule in China are described and cumulative abnormal returns (CAR) used to measure its impact on bidders and target companies. The results show that shareholders of target companies receive a better return when bidders acquire more than 50% of the shareholding in target companies. This suggests that China should reform its mandatory bid rule by restricting the use of proportional partial bids to increase returns to the target shareholders. The results also show that in making a proportional partial bid to take a company over, bidders receive a better return when they aim for corporate restructuring that adheres to the state-led industrial policy. The authors recommend that the law should strike a balance between following the state-led policy of corporate restructuring and protecting the interests of target companies.","PeriodicalId":286147,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Law: Corporate & Financial Law: Interdisciplinary Approaches eJournal","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Mandatory Bid Rule for Takeover Law in China: An Empirical and Comparative Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Lee, Yonghui Bao, Jinlin Li\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3676286\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper discusses the purpose and practice of the mandatory bid rule in takeovers in the UK. A literature review looks at the impact of the mandatory bid rule in a takeover on both bidders and target companies. The origin and evolution of the mandatory bid rule in China are described and cumulative abnormal returns (CAR) used to measure its impact on bidders and target companies. The results show that shareholders of target companies receive a better return when bidders acquire more than 50% of the shareholding in target companies. This suggests that China should reform its mandatory bid rule by restricting the use of proportional partial bids to increase returns to the target shareholders. The results also show that in making a proportional partial bid to take a company over, bidders receive a better return when they aim for corporate restructuring that adheres to the state-led industrial policy. The authors recommend that the law should strike a balance between following the state-led policy of corporate restructuring and protecting the interests of target companies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":286147,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corporate Law: Corporate & Financial Law: Interdisciplinary Approaches eJournal\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corporate Law: Corporate & Financial Law: Interdisciplinary Approaches eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3676286\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Law: Corporate & Financial Law: Interdisciplinary Approaches eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3676286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了英国强制收购规则的目的和实践。一篇文献综述着眼于强制性投标规则在收购中对竞标者和目标公司的影响。本文描述了强制投标规则在中国的起源和演变,并利用累积异常收益(CAR)来衡量其对竞标者和目标公司的影响。结果表明,当投标人收购目标公司50%以上的股权时,目标公司股东获得更好的回报。这表明,中国应改革其强制性收购规则,限制使用比例部分收购来增加目标股东的回报。研究结果还表明,在按比例进行部分收购时,如果竞标者的目标是符合国家主导的产业政策的企业重组,那么他们会获得更好的回报。作者建议,法律应该在遵循国家主导的企业结构调整政策和保护目标企业的利益之间取得平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Mandatory Bid Rule for Takeover Law in China: An Empirical and Comparative Analysis
This paper discusses the purpose and practice of the mandatory bid rule in takeovers in the UK. A literature review looks at the impact of the mandatory bid rule in a takeover on both bidders and target companies. The origin and evolution of the mandatory bid rule in China are described and cumulative abnormal returns (CAR) used to measure its impact on bidders and target companies. The results show that shareholders of target companies receive a better return when bidders acquire more than 50% of the shareholding in target companies. This suggests that China should reform its mandatory bid rule by restricting the use of proportional partial bids to increase returns to the target shareholders. The results also show that in making a proportional partial bid to take a company over, bidders receive a better return when they aim for corporate restructuring that adheres to the state-led industrial policy. The authors recommend that the law should strike a balance between following the state-led policy of corporate restructuring and protecting the interests of target companies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信