符号与禁忌:伊冯娜·薇拉诗歌小说透视(书评)

Drew Shaw
{"title":"符号与禁忌:伊冯娜·薇拉诗歌小说透视(书评)","authors":"Drew Shaw","doi":"10.1353/AFR.2007.0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"formations – post-colonial studies, cultural studies, Third World studies, African and Africana studies, comparative anthropological and sociological studies of modernity – that are restructuring, problematizing, and enriching our understandings of cultural (self)-conceptions and categories’ (pp. 6–7). I suspect that some readers will have already decided from this taster whether they want to read the book or not. The topic is vast, important and contentious; the prose dense. To suggest the broad range of reference, it is enough to remark that E. W. Blyden’s name is joined in the book by those of writers and thinkers from across the world and across disciplines. Other names in the index include Chinua Achebe, Kwegyir Aggrey, Benedict Anderson, Kwame Anthony Appiah, Kwame Arhin, Ayi Kwei Armah, Ahuma Attoh and Nnamdi Azikiwe – to stray no further than surnames beginning with the first letter of the alphabet. Korang is at ease with many of those he draws into his argument. In view of the broad sweep of the discussion, it is not surprising to find in the Acknowledgements references to fellow intellectuals from various disciplines whose support was important in seeing through this hugely ambitious project. The list includes Stephen Slemon, Biodun Jeyifo, Zohreh Sullivan, Toyin Falola and Paul Zeleza. The last two were particularly involved, it seems, in getting a ‘sizeable manuscript approved for publication’ and out in the distinguished series of which Falola is the Senior Editor. There are indications in the text, including the reference to 1997 as ‘recently’ (p. 305), that this process took some time. The research on which the book is based is very impressive, but sometimes ‘improvised’ and incomplete. I particularly appreciate the indication that relatives had helped by visiting archives in London (‘Colingdale’, sic) and West Africa on Korang’s behalf. In the real world this is what happens and projects of this magnitude involve many. It may be that the items recovered in Cape Coast Archive included articles by Kobina Sekyi. I was happy to see Kofi Baku’s annotated bibliography of Sekyi’s work listed among the works consulted, sorry not to see use had been made of the same historian’s thesis, ‘An Intellectual in Nationalist Politics’. That important study examines some of the myths about Sekyi’s life that Korang repeats uncritically. With such a vast topic, so many ‘stories’ to tell and such an interdisciplinary approach, it was, perhaps, inevitable that there would be areas around the edge of Writing Ghana, Imagining Africa that would be inadequately investigated, swept up into the thesis. This said, it should be recognized that the central interests of the volume, those described in the quotation with which I began, have been vigorously pursued. Readers prepared to grapple with the laborious prose in which Korang has expressed his ideas will be exhausted, irritated and rewarded by his book.","PeriodicalId":337749,"journal":{"name":"Africa: The Journal of the International African Institute","volume":" 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sign and Taboo: Perspectives on the Poetic Fiction of Yvonne Vera (review)\",\"authors\":\"Drew Shaw\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/AFR.2007.0036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"formations – post-colonial studies, cultural studies, Third World studies, African and Africana studies, comparative anthropological and sociological studies of modernity – that are restructuring, problematizing, and enriching our understandings of cultural (self)-conceptions and categories’ (pp. 6–7). I suspect that some readers will have already decided from this taster whether they want to read the book or not. The topic is vast, important and contentious; the prose dense. To suggest the broad range of reference, it is enough to remark that E. W. Blyden’s name is joined in the book by those of writers and thinkers from across the world and across disciplines. Other names in the index include Chinua Achebe, Kwegyir Aggrey, Benedict Anderson, Kwame Anthony Appiah, Kwame Arhin, Ayi Kwei Armah, Ahuma Attoh and Nnamdi Azikiwe – to stray no further than surnames beginning with the first letter of the alphabet. Korang is at ease with many of those he draws into his argument. In view of the broad sweep of the discussion, it is not surprising to find in the Acknowledgements references to fellow intellectuals from various disciplines whose support was important in seeing through this hugely ambitious project. The list includes Stephen Slemon, Biodun Jeyifo, Zohreh Sullivan, Toyin Falola and Paul Zeleza. The last two were particularly involved, it seems, in getting a ‘sizeable manuscript approved for publication’ and out in the distinguished series of which Falola is the Senior Editor. There are indications in the text, including the reference to 1997 as ‘recently’ (p. 305), that this process took some time. The research on which the book is based is very impressive, but sometimes ‘improvised’ and incomplete. I particularly appreciate the indication that relatives had helped by visiting archives in London (‘Colingdale’, sic) and West Africa on Korang’s behalf. In the real world this is what happens and projects of this magnitude involve many. It may be that the items recovered in Cape Coast Archive included articles by Kobina Sekyi. I was happy to see Kofi Baku’s annotated bibliography of Sekyi’s work listed among the works consulted, sorry not to see use had been made of the same historian’s thesis, ‘An Intellectual in Nationalist Politics’. That important study examines some of the myths about Sekyi’s life that Korang repeats uncritically. With such a vast topic, so many ‘stories’ to tell and such an interdisciplinary approach, it was, perhaps, inevitable that there would be areas around the edge of Writing Ghana, Imagining Africa that would be inadequately investigated, swept up into the thesis. This said, it should be recognized that the central interests of the volume, those described in the quotation with which I began, have been vigorously pursued. Readers prepared to grapple with the laborious prose in which Korang has expressed his ideas will be exhausted, irritated and rewarded by his book.\",\"PeriodicalId\":337749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Africa: The Journal of the International African Institute\",\"volume\":\" 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Africa: The Journal of the International African Institute\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/AFR.2007.0036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Africa: The Journal of the International African Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/AFR.2007.0036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

形成——后殖民研究、文化研究、第三世界研究、非洲和非洲研究、现代性的比较人类学和社会学研究——正在重构、问题化和丰富我们对文化(自我)概念和范畴的理解。我怀疑一些读者已经从这本书中决定了他们是否想要读这本书。这个话题广泛、重要且有争议;这篇散文密密麻麻。为了说明其广泛的参考范围,只要指出e.w.布莱顿的名字在书中加入了来自世界各地和跨学科的作家和思想家的名字就足够了。榜上有名的姓氏还包括奇努阿·阿契贝、奎吉尔·阿格利、本尼迪克特·安德森、夸梅·安东尼·阿皮亚、夸梅·阿欣、阿伊·夸维·阿玛、阿胡玛·阿托和纳姆迪·阿齐基维——这些姓氏都是以字母表的第一个字母开头的。柯朗对许多被他引到自己观点中的人都很坦然。鉴于讨论的广泛性,在致谢中发现来自不同学科的知识分子同行的引用并不奇怪,他们的支持对于完成这个雄心勃勃的项目至关重要。其中包括斯蒂芬·斯勒蒙、比奥顿·杰伊福、佐雷·沙利文、托因·法罗拉和保罗·泽莱扎。最后两个人似乎特别参与了,让一份“相当大的手稿被批准出版”,并在法罗拉担任高级编辑的著名系列中出版。案文中有迹象表明,包括将1997年称为“最近”(第305页),这一过程花了一些时间。这本书所基于的研究是非常令人印象深刻的,但有时是“即兴的”和不完整的。我特别赞赏亲属代表Korang参观伦敦(“Colingdale”,原文如此)和西非的档案所提供的帮助。在现实世界中就是这样,这种规模的项目涉及很多人。在海岸角档案馆找到的物品可能包括Kobina Sekyi的文章。我很高兴看到科菲·巴库(Kofi Baku)对塞吉(Sekyi)作品的注释参考书目被列入参考作品之列,遗憾的是没有看到同一篇历史学家的论文“民族主义政治中的知识分子”被使用。这项重要的研究考察了科朗不加批判地重复的关于塞吉一生的一些神话。有了如此庞大的主题,如此多的“故事”要讲,如此跨学科的方法,也许不可避免地会有一些领域在写作加纳,想象非洲的边缘被充分调查,被纳入论文中。话虽如此,但应该认识到,本书的核心兴趣,也就是我在开头引用的那句话中所描述的,已经得到了大力的追求。那些准备好阅读柯朗用繁复的散文表达自己思想的读者,将会被他的书所累,被他的书所激怒,并得到回报。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sign and Taboo: Perspectives on the Poetic Fiction of Yvonne Vera (review)
formations – post-colonial studies, cultural studies, Third World studies, African and Africana studies, comparative anthropological and sociological studies of modernity – that are restructuring, problematizing, and enriching our understandings of cultural (self)-conceptions and categories’ (pp. 6–7). I suspect that some readers will have already decided from this taster whether they want to read the book or not. The topic is vast, important and contentious; the prose dense. To suggest the broad range of reference, it is enough to remark that E. W. Blyden’s name is joined in the book by those of writers and thinkers from across the world and across disciplines. Other names in the index include Chinua Achebe, Kwegyir Aggrey, Benedict Anderson, Kwame Anthony Appiah, Kwame Arhin, Ayi Kwei Armah, Ahuma Attoh and Nnamdi Azikiwe – to stray no further than surnames beginning with the first letter of the alphabet. Korang is at ease with many of those he draws into his argument. In view of the broad sweep of the discussion, it is not surprising to find in the Acknowledgements references to fellow intellectuals from various disciplines whose support was important in seeing through this hugely ambitious project. The list includes Stephen Slemon, Biodun Jeyifo, Zohreh Sullivan, Toyin Falola and Paul Zeleza. The last two were particularly involved, it seems, in getting a ‘sizeable manuscript approved for publication’ and out in the distinguished series of which Falola is the Senior Editor. There are indications in the text, including the reference to 1997 as ‘recently’ (p. 305), that this process took some time. The research on which the book is based is very impressive, but sometimes ‘improvised’ and incomplete. I particularly appreciate the indication that relatives had helped by visiting archives in London (‘Colingdale’, sic) and West Africa on Korang’s behalf. In the real world this is what happens and projects of this magnitude involve many. It may be that the items recovered in Cape Coast Archive included articles by Kobina Sekyi. I was happy to see Kofi Baku’s annotated bibliography of Sekyi’s work listed among the works consulted, sorry not to see use had been made of the same historian’s thesis, ‘An Intellectual in Nationalist Politics’. That important study examines some of the myths about Sekyi’s life that Korang repeats uncritically. With such a vast topic, so many ‘stories’ to tell and such an interdisciplinary approach, it was, perhaps, inevitable that there would be areas around the edge of Writing Ghana, Imagining Africa that would be inadequately investigated, swept up into the thesis. This said, it should be recognized that the central interests of the volume, those described in the quotation with which I began, have been vigorously pursued. Readers prepared to grapple with the laborious prose in which Korang has expressed his ideas will be exhausted, irritated and rewarded by his book.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信