ISO/IEC 9798-2认证标准使用AVISPA的形式化分析

Sheikh Ziauddin, Bruno Martin
{"title":"ISO/IEC 9798-2认证标准使用AVISPA的形式化分析","authors":"Sheikh Ziauddin, Bruno Martin","doi":"10.1109/ASIAJCIS.2013.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Use of formal methods is considered as a useful and efficient technique for the validation of security properties of the protocols. In this paper, we analyze the protocols of ISO/IEC 9798-2 entity authentication standard using a state-of-the-art tool for automated analysis named AVISPA. Our analysis of the standard using AVISPA's OFMC and CL-AtSe back-ends shows that the two party protocols are secure against the specified security properties while the back-ends are able to find attacks against unilateral and mutual authentication protocols involving a trusted third party.","PeriodicalId":286298,"journal":{"name":"2013 Eighth Asia Joint Conference on Information Security","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Formal Analysis of ISO/IEC 9798-2 Authentication Standard Using AVISPA\",\"authors\":\"Sheikh Ziauddin, Bruno Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ASIAJCIS.2013.25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Use of formal methods is considered as a useful and efficient technique for the validation of security properties of the protocols. In this paper, we analyze the protocols of ISO/IEC 9798-2 entity authentication standard using a state-of-the-art tool for automated analysis named AVISPA. Our analysis of the standard using AVISPA's OFMC and CL-AtSe back-ends shows that the two party protocols are secure against the specified security properties while the back-ends are able to find attacks against unilateral and mutual authentication protocols involving a trusted third party.\",\"PeriodicalId\":286298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 Eighth Asia Joint Conference on Information Security\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 Eighth Asia Joint Conference on Information Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASIAJCIS.2013.25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 Eighth Asia Joint Conference on Information Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASIAJCIS.2013.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

使用形式化方法被认为是验证协议安全属性的有效技术。在本文中,我们使用最先进的自动分析工具AVISPA来分析ISO/IEC 9798-2实体认证标准的协议。我们使用AVISPA的OFMC和CL-AtSe后端对标准进行的分析表明,双方协议对指定的安全属性是安全的,而后端能够发现针对涉及可信第三方的单边和相互认证协议的攻击。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Formal Analysis of ISO/IEC 9798-2 Authentication Standard Using AVISPA
Use of formal methods is considered as a useful and efficient technique for the validation of security properties of the protocols. In this paper, we analyze the protocols of ISO/IEC 9798-2 entity authentication standard using a state-of-the-art tool for automated analysis named AVISPA. Our analysis of the standard using AVISPA's OFMC and CL-AtSe back-ends shows that the two party protocols are secure against the specified security properties while the back-ends are able to find attacks against unilateral and mutual authentication protocols involving a trusted third party.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信