多参与者交易话语权分析

Hirofumi Masui, Takahiro Oshima, K. Nakabayashi, Eisuke Nagahashi, T. Taniguchi
{"title":"多参与者交易话语权分析","authors":"Hirofumi Masui, Takahiro Oshima, K. Nakabayashi, Eisuke Nagahashi, T. Taniguchi","doi":"10.5687/iscie.34.219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dealing Rights to Speak (DRS) is a communication-field mechanism enabling people to manage speech order in a decentralized manner. However, the method was evaluated only in small face-toface meetings where less than five people attended. In this paper, we analyze the effect of DRS when it is applied to a meeting where a large number of people, e.g., more than 10, are attending. For this purpose, we first developed a mobile application with which many people can use DRS in their discussions. We performed an experiment with four conditions, i.e., 4 participants with and without DRS and 16 participants with and without DRS. We compared the four conditions in both a subjective and an objective manner. The results show that the effect of DRS on a large number of people is similar to that of a small number of people. Also, some other findings were newly observed. It was shown that the number of “filler” is increased when people use DRS. It was shown that the quality of the meetings tends to degrade when the number of participants increases without any communication-field mechanism though DRS can mitigate the negative effect.","PeriodicalId":403477,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the Institute of Systems, Control and Information Engineers","volume":"135 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysing the Dealing Rights to Speak with a Large Number of Participants\",\"authors\":\"Hirofumi Masui, Takahiro Oshima, K. Nakabayashi, Eisuke Nagahashi, T. Taniguchi\",\"doi\":\"10.5687/iscie.34.219\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dealing Rights to Speak (DRS) is a communication-field mechanism enabling people to manage speech order in a decentralized manner. However, the method was evaluated only in small face-toface meetings where less than five people attended. In this paper, we analyze the effect of DRS when it is applied to a meeting where a large number of people, e.g., more than 10, are attending. For this purpose, we first developed a mobile application with which many people can use DRS in their discussions. We performed an experiment with four conditions, i.e., 4 participants with and without DRS and 16 participants with and without DRS. We compared the four conditions in both a subjective and an objective manner. The results show that the effect of DRS on a large number of people is similar to that of a small number of people. Also, some other findings were newly observed. It was shown that the number of “filler” is increased when people use DRS. It was shown that the quality of the meetings tends to degrade when the number of participants increases without any communication-field mechanism though DRS can mitigate the negative effect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":403477,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transactions of the Institute of Systems, Control and Information Engineers\",\"volume\":\"135 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transactions of the Institute of Systems, Control and Information Engineers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5687/iscie.34.219\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the Institute of Systems, Control and Information Engineers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5687/iscie.34.219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

说话权交易(DRS)是一种通信领域机制,使人们能够以分散的方式管理说话顺序。然而,该方法仅在少于5人参加的小型面对面会议中进行了评估。在本文中,我们分析了DRS应用于人数较多的会议(如10人以上)时的效果。为此,我们首先开发了一个移动应用程序,许多人可以在讨论中使用DRS。我们进行了四种情况的实验,即4名受试者有和没有DRS, 16名受试者有和没有DRS。我们从主观和客观两个方面对这四种情况进行了比较。结果表明,DRS对多数人的影响与对少数人的影响相似。此外,还有一些新发现。研究表明,当人们使用DRS时,“填充物”的数量增加。研究结果表明,在没有通信场机制的情况下,当与会者数量增加时,会议质量趋于下降,而DRS可以缓解这种负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysing the Dealing Rights to Speak with a Large Number of Participants
Dealing Rights to Speak (DRS) is a communication-field mechanism enabling people to manage speech order in a decentralized manner. However, the method was evaluated only in small face-toface meetings where less than five people attended. In this paper, we analyze the effect of DRS when it is applied to a meeting where a large number of people, e.g., more than 10, are attending. For this purpose, we first developed a mobile application with which many people can use DRS in their discussions. We performed an experiment with four conditions, i.e., 4 participants with and without DRS and 16 participants with and without DRS. We compared the four conditions in both a subjective and an objective manner. The results show that the effect of DRS on a large number of people is similar to that of a small number of people. Also, some other findings were newly observed. It was shown that the number of “filler” is increased when people use DRS. It was shown that the quality of the meetings tends to degrade when the number of participants increases without any communication-field mechanism though DRS can mitigate the negative effect.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信