分布式热电联产与集中式热电联产:技术比较

N. Strachan
{"title":"分布式热电联产与集中式热电联产:技术比较","authors":"N. Strachan","doi":"10.1080/10668680209508970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Three distributed cogeneration (DG) and three centralized electricity technologies were compared for fuel use, private costs and externality costs from CO2, SO2 and NOX emissions. This generalized feasibility comparison investigated the benefits of Cogen/DG over a range of heat to power ratios (HPR). IC engines are found to be both economical and environmentally friendly. Micro-turbines are even better. Therefore, Cogen/DG provides economic, fuel use, and emissions savings in applications with well matched and consistent demands for electricity and heat.","PeriodicalId":374324,"journal":{"name":"Cogeneration and Competitive Power Journal","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distributed Cogeneration vs. Centralized Generation: A Technical Comparison\",\"authors\":\"N. Strachan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10668680209508970\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Three distributed cogeneration (DG) and three centralized electricity technologies were compared for fuel use, private costs and externality costs from CO2, SO2 and NOX emissions. This generalized feasibility comparison investigated the benefits of Cogen/DG over a range of heat to power ratios (HPR). IC engines are found to be both economical and environmentally friendly. Micro-turbines are even better. Therefore, Cogen/DG provides economic, fuel use, and emissions savings in applications with well matched and consistent demands for electricity and heat.\",\"PeriodicalId\":374324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cogeneration and Competitive Power Journal\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cogeneration and Competitive Power Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10668680209508970\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cogeneration and Competitive Power Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10668680209508970","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文比较了三种分布式热电联产(DG)和三种集中式发电技术的燃料使用、私人成本和二氧化碳、二氧化硫和氮氧化物排放的外部性成本。这种广义的可行性比较研究了Cogen/DG在热功率比(HPR)范围内的优势。人们发现内燃机既经济又环保。微型涡轮机就更好了。因此,Cogen/DG在电力和热量需求匹配良好且一致的应用中提供了经济,燃料使用和排放节约。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Distributed Cogeneration vs. Centralized Generation: A Technical Comparison
ABSTRACT Three distributed cogeneration (DG) and three centralized electricity technologies were compared for fuel use, private costs and externality costs from CO2, SO2 and NOX emissions. This generalized feasibility comparison investigated the benefits of Cogen/DG over a range of heat to power ratios (HPR). IC engines are found to be both economical and environmentally friendly. Micro-turbines are even better. Therefore, Cogen/DG provides economic, fuel use, and emissions savings in applications with well matched and consistent demands for electricity and heat.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信