{"title":"从确定到不确定","authors":"Samantha Hardy","doi":"10.4324/9781003128038-13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We will call a triple (u, f, g) as in theorem 3 a representation of preferences = (F , T) in the sense of theorem 3. Proof of theorem 3: We only proof sufficiency of the axioms for the representation. Part I: certain consumption paths 1) By axiom A4 for all x 1 , x 2 , x","PeriodicalId":265774,"journal":{"name":"Conflict Coaching Fundamentals","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Certain to uncertain\",\"authors\":\"Samantha Hardy\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781003128038-13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We will call a triple (u, f, g) as in theorem 3 a representation of preferences = (F , T) in the sense of theorem 3. Proof of theorem 3: We only proof sufficiency of the axioms for the representation. Part I: certain consumption paths 1) By axiom A4 for all x 1 , x 2 , x\",\"PeriodicalId\":265774,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Conflict Coaching Fundamentals\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Conflict Coaching Fundamentals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003128038-13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conflict Coaching Fundamentals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003128038-13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在定理3中，我们称三元组(u, f, g)为定理3意义上的偏好= (f, T)的表示。定理3的证明:我们只证明了表示的公理的充分性。第一部分:某些消费路径1)由公理A4对所有x 1, x 2, x
We will call a triple (u, f, g) as in theorem 3 a representation of preferences = (F , T) in the sense of theorem 3. Proof of theorem 3: We only proof sufficiency of the axioms for the representation. Part I: certain consumption paths 1) By axiom A4 for all x 1 , x 2 , x
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
