混凝土徐变试验方法在俄罗斯和国外规范性文件中的比较。第2部分。测试和处理结果

P. Arleninov
{"title":"混凝土徐变试验方法在俄罗斯和国外规范性文件中的比较。第2部分。测试和处理结果","authors":"P. Arleninov","doi":"10.37538/2224-9494-2022-2(33)-32-43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The main approaches to long-term creep tests of concrete regulated by GOST 24544-2020, valid in the Russian Federation, as well as foreign ISO, ASTM, and EN standards, are analyzed.Aim. In this work, fundamental differences in conducting tests following Russian and foreign standards are determined. These efforts are essential and urgent, since, in order to use test results obtained abroad in Russia, it is necessary to harmonize test methods and initial test parameters (samples, measuring and test equipment, etc.).Materials and methods. The article reviews testing procedures, controlled parameters, and processing of result; part 1 of the article covered the application, testing and measuring equipment, manufacturing process, sample parameters and fittings, and test preparation.Results. ISO, ASTM, and EN are comparable; however, they differ greatly from GOST 24544 in some respects, in particular, regarding the sample parameters and the methods of their installation in the testing equipment.Conclusion. Further harmonization of GOST 24544 with the aforementioned foreign standards is necessary. ","PeriodicalId":169749,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Science and Research Center of Construction","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of concrete creep test methods as per Russian and foreign normative documents. Part 2. Testing and processing of results\",\"authors\":\"P. Arleninov\",\"doi\":\"10.37538/2224-9494-2022-2(33)-32-43\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. The main approaches to long-term creep tests of concrete regulated by GOST 24544-2020, valid in the Russian Federation, as well as foreign ISO, ASTM, and EN standards, are analyzed.Aim. In this work, fundamental differences in conducting tests following Russian and foreign standards are determined. These efforts are essential and urgent, since, in order to use test results obtained abroad in Russia, it is necessary to harmonize test methods and initial test parameters (samples, measuring and test equipment, etc.).Materials and methods. The article reviews testing procedures, controlled parameters, and processing of result; part 1 of the article covered the application, testing and measuring equipment, manufacturing process, sample parameters and fittings, and test preparation.Results. ISO, ASTM, and EN are comparable; however, they differ greatly from GOST 24544 in some respects, in particular, regarding the sample parameters and the methods of their installation in the testing equipment.Conclusion. Further harmonization of GOST 24544 with the aforementioned foreign standards is necessary. \",\"PeriodicalId\":169749,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Science and Research Center of Construction\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Science and Research Center of Construction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37538/2224-9494-2022-2(33)-32-43\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Science and Research Center of Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37538/2224-9494-2022-2(33)-32-43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍。分析了在俄罗斯联邦有效的GOST 24544-2020以及国外ISO、ASTM和EN标准中规定的混凝土长期徐变试验的主要方法。在这项工作中,确定了按照俄罗斯和外国标准进行测试的根本区别。这些努力是必要和紧迫的,因为为了在俄罗斯使用国外获得的测试结果,有必要协调测试方法和初始测试参数(样品,测量和测试设备等)。材料和方法。本文综述了检测程序、控制参数和结果处理;文章的第一部分介绍了应用、测试和测量设备、制造工艺、样品参数和配件以及测试准备。ISO、ASTM和EN具有可比性;然而,它们在某些方面与GOST 24544有很大的不同,特别是在样品参数和它们在测试设备中的安装方法方面。GOST 24544与上述外国标准的进一步协调是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of concrete creep test methods as per Russian and foreign normative documents. Part 2. Testing and processing of results
Introduction. The main approaches to long-term creep tests of concrete regulated by GOST 24544-2020, valid in the Russian Federation, as well as foreign ISO, ASTM, and EN standards, are analyzed.Aim. In this work, fundamental differences in conducting tests following Russian and foreign standards are determined. These efforts are essential and urgent, since, in order to use test results obtained abroad in Russia, it is necessary to harmonize test methods and initial test parameters (samples, measuring and test equipment, etc.).Materials and methods. The article reviews testing procedures, controlled parameters, and processing of result; part 1 of the article covered the application, testing and measuring equipment, manufacturing process, sample parameters and fittings, and test preparation.Results. ISO, ASTM, and EN are comparable; however, they differ greatly from GOST 24544 in some respects, in particular, regarding the sample parameters and the methods of their installation in the testing equipment.Conclusion. Further harmonization of GOST 24544 with the aforementioned foreign standards is necessary. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信