公立学校儿童宗教自由

M. Hunter-Henin
{"title":"公立学校儿童宗教自由","authors":"M. Hunter-Henin","doi":"10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190694395.013.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter focuses on children’s rights to religious freedom raised against state policies in state schools. It analyzes the distinction usually drawn between religious education (RE) courses and others. Most legal systems will allow non-denominational RE courses in state schools provided they are accompanied with rights to opt out. By contrast, purely “secular” courses will usually be mandatory. This chapter will argue that, assuming that rights to opt out legitimately accompany RE courses, they should also attach to secular courses on ethics and morality. On the contrary, religious and moral implications of scientific theories, such as evolutionary theories, should not give rise to exemption rights. In a second part, the chapter considers religious symbol cases, arguing that whether symbols are state endorsed or worn by pupils, courts should resist the temptation to ascribe unilateral meanings to symbols, but carry out instead a contextual assessment of their impact.","PeriodicalId":234430,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Children and the Law","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Children’s Religious Freedom in State Schools\",\"authors\":\"M. Hunter-Henin\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190694395.013.27\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter focuses on children’s rights to religious freedom raised against state policies in state schools. It analyzes the distinction usually drawn between religious education (RE) courses and others. Most legal systems will allow non-denominational RE courses in state schools provided they are accompanied with rights to opt out. By contrast, purely “secular” courses will usually be mandatory. This chapter will argue that, assuming that rights to opt out legitimately accompany RE courses, they should also attach to secular courses on ethics and morality. On the contrary, religious and moral implications of scientific theories, such as evolutionary theories, should not give rise to exemption rights. In a second part, the chapter considers religious symbol cases, arguing that whether symbols are state endorsed or worn by pupils, courts should resist the temptation to ascribe unilateral meanings to symbols, but carry out instead a contextual assessment of their impact.\",\"PeriodicalId\":234430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Oxford Handbook of Children and the Law\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Oxford Handbook of Children and the Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190694395.013.27\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Children and the Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190694395.013.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这一章的重点是在公立学校提出的反对国家政策的儿童宗教自由权利。它分析了宗教教育(RE)课程与其他课程之间的区别。大多数法律体系都允许在公立学校开设非宗派的RE课程,前提是这些课程有退出的权利。相比之下,纯粹的“世俗”课程通常是强制性的。本章将论证,假设选择退出的权利合法地伴随着RE课程,它们也应该附加到世俗的伦理和道德课程。相反,科学理论的宗教和道德含义,如进化论,不应产生豁免权。在第二部分中,本章考虑了宗教象征的案例,认为无论这些象征是国家认可的还是学生佩戴的,法院都应该抵制将单边意义归因于象征的诱惑,而是对它们的影响进行上下文评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Children’s Religious Freedom in State Schools
This chapter focuses on children’s rights to religious freedom raised against state policies in state schools. It analyzes the distinction usually drawn between religious education (RE) courses and others. Most legal systems will allow non-denominational RE courses in state schools provided they are accompanied with rights to opt out. By contrast, purely “secular” courses will usually be mandatory. This chapter will argue that, assuming that rights to opt out legitimately accompany RE courses, they should also attach to secular courses on ethics and morality. On the contrary, religious and moral implications of scientific theories, such as evolutionary theories, should not give rise to exemption rights. In a second part, the chapter considers religious symbol cases, arguing that whether symbols are state endorsed or worn by pupils, courts should resist the temptation to ascribe unilateral meanings to symbols, but carry out instead a contextual assessment of their impact.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信