超越自由权:霍尼思批判民主理论的共和分析

Nicolás Emanuel Olivares
{"title":"超越自由权:霍尼思批判民主理论的共和分析","authors":"Nicolás Emanuel Olivares","doi":"10.5007/1677-2954.2020v19n3p719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"At the beginning of the 2010's, German philosopher A. Honneth outlined a specific critical democratic conception based on a social model of individual freedom, which he considers superior to negative and reflective models. Honneth believes that deliberative democracy depends conceptually and empirically on the social model of individual freedom, so that if certain social conditions are not met, citizens lack the conditions that would allow them to participate in the construction of democratic will. In this work, we will proceed to the reconstruction of the main normative postulates of the critical democratic conception of Honneth, who positively defines justice as mutual recognition, contrasting them specularly with those of the republican conception defended by the Irish philosopher P. Pettit, which is based on a negative model of political freedom understood as nondomination. In summary, we will explain four comparative attractions that P. Pettit's theory offers over that of Honneth in terms of methodology, concept of justice, classification of models of freedom, and priority of justice. http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2020v19n2p151 http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2020v19n3p719","PeriodicalId":143268,"journal":{"name":"Ethic@: an International Journal for Moral Philosophy","volume":"521 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Além do direito da liberdade: uma análise republicana da teoria democrática crítica de A. Honneth\",\"authors\":\"Nicolás Emanuel Olivares\",\"doi\":\"10.5007/1677-2954.2020v19n3p719\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"At the beginning of the 2010's, German philosopher A. Honneth outlined a specific critical democratic conception based on a social model of individual freedom, which he considers superior to negative and reflective models. Honneth believes that deliberative democracy depends conceptually and empirically on the social model of individual freedom, so that if certain social conditions are not met, citizens lack the conditions that would allow them to participate in the construction of democratic will. In this work, we will proceed to the reconstruction of the main normative postulates of the critical democratic conception of Honneth, who positively defines justice as mutual recognition, contrasting them specularly with those of the republican conception defended by the Irish philosopher P. Pettit, which is based on a negative model of political freedom understood as nondomination. In summary, we will explain four comparative attractions that P. Pettit's theory offers over that of Honneth in terms of methodology, concept of justice, classification of models of freedom, and priority of justice. http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2020v19n2p151 http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2020v19n3p719\",\"PeriodicalId\":143268,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethic@: an International Journal for Moral Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"521 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethic@: an International Journal for Moral Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2020v19n3p719\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethic@: an International Journal for Moral Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2020v19n3p719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

20世纪60年代初,德国哲学家a . Honneth在个人自由的社会模式的基础上提出了一种具体的批判民主概念,他认为这种概念优于消极和反思的模式。Honneth认为,协商民主在概念上和经验上依赖于个人自由的社会模式,因此,如果某些社会条件不满足,公民就缺乏允许他们参与民主意志建设的条件。在本书中,我们将继续重建Honneth批判民主概念的主要规范假设,他积极地将正义定义为相互承认,并将其与爱尔兰哲学家P. Pettit捍卫的共和概念进行了推测性的对比,后者基于一种被理解为非统治的政治自由的消极模式。总之,我们将从方法论、正义概念、自由模式的分类和正义的优先性等方面解释佩蒂特的理论相对于霍内斯的理论的四个比较吸引力。http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1677 v19n3p719——2954.2020 - 2954.2020 v19n2p151 http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1677
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Além do direito da liberdade: uma análise republicana da teoria democrática crítica de A. Honneth
At the beginning of the 2010's, German philosopher A. Honneth outlined a specific critical democratic conception based on a social model of individual freedom, which he considers superior to negative and reflective models. Honneth believes that deliberative democracy depends conceptually and empirically on the social model of individual freedom, so that if certain social conditions are not met, citizens lack the conditions that would allow them to participate in the construction of democratic will. In this work, we will proceed to the reconstruction of the main normative postulates of the critical democratic conception of Honneth, who positively defines justice as mutual recognition, contrasting them specularly with those of the republican conception defended by the Irish philosopher P. Pettit, which is based on a negative model of political freedom understood as nondomination. In summary, we will explain four comparative attractions that P. Pettit's theory offers over that of Honneth in terms of methodology, concept of justice, classification of models of freedom, and priority of justice. http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2020v19n2p151 http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1677-2954.2020v19n3p719
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信